Cited by 29COVID-19 and Mental HealthHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutOccupational Health and Burnout

The impact of COVID-19 on healthcare workers’ anxiety levels

Open access
Karasu, Fatma, Öztürk Çopur, Ebru, Ayar, Duygu·2022·Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Aim This study aims to examine the effect of COVID-19 on the anxiety levels of healthcare employees.Methods This descriptive study used the snowball sampling method to recruit participants. The study was conducted between 18 and 25 April 2020 with a total of 710 participants. The data were collected using a sociodemographic questionnaire and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Ethics committee approval was obtained to conduct the study, and the data were analyzed using the SPSS 24.0 statistical package program using descriptive statistics, t tests and ANOVA.Results In the study, 46.8% of the participants were in the 26-35 age group, 60.7% were female, 19.9% worked at clinics with COVID-19 patients (service, intensive care and emergency clinics), and 17.6% had a chronic disease. The state and trait anxiety mean scores of the participants were 60.29 ± 6.13 and 44.18 ± 7.69, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found in the participants' state and trait anxiety levels with respect to their age, gender, unit of work, marital status, status of having children and presence of a chronic disease (p < 0.05).Conclusion The state and trait anxiety levels of the healthcare workers in the study were found to be "severe" and "moderate," respectively.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10389-020-01466-x

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karasu, F., Öztürk Çopur, E., & Ayar, D.
Affiliations
  • Kilis 7 Aralık University (TR)
  • Gaziantep İslam Bilim ve Teknoloji Üniversitesi (TR)
Corresponding author
Karasu, Fatma
Venue
Journal of Public Health
Published
2021-01-04
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
1399-1409
ISSN
  • 0943-1853 (ISSN-L)
  • 2198-1833
  • 1613-2238
OpenAlex
W3120132329
Cited by
29
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
no
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers, anxiety, state anxiety, trait anxiety, occupational stress, chronic disease, sociodemographic factors, intensive care, emergency department

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review