Cited by 554Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychology and Mental HealthGender Roles and Identity Studies

Public Stigma of Mental Illness in the United States: A Systematic Literature Review

Open access
Parcesepe, Angela M., Cabassa, Leopoldo J.·2013·Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

Abstract

Public stigma is a pervasive barrier that prevents many individuals in the U.S. from engaging in mental health care. This systematic literature review aims to: (1) evaluate methods used to study the public's stigma toward mental disorders, (2) summarize stigma findings focused on the public's stigmatizing beliefs and actions and attitudes toward mental health treatment for children and adults with mental illness, and (3) draw recommendations for reducing stigma towards individuals with mental disorders and advance research in this area. Public stigma of mental illness in the U.S. was widespread. Findings can inform interventions to reduce the public's stigma of mental illness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10488-012-0430-z

Cites

68 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parcesepe, A. M., & Cabassa, L. J.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Parcesepe, Angela M.
Venue
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Published
2012-07-26
Volume
40
Issue
5
Pages
384-399
ISSN
  • 0894-587X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3289
OpenAlex
W2056883717
Cited by
554
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01 MH09118, K01MH091118, R25MH080916)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (L60 MD001850)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Keywords
public stigma, mental illness, stigma reduction, mental health service utilization, child psychopathology, adults with mental illness, United States
MeSH terms
Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, Humans, Mental Health Services, Prejudice, United States, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review