Cited by 18Cognitive Abilities and TestingGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetics and Physical Performance

A General Cognitive Ability Factor for the UK Biobank

Open access
Williams, Camille Michèle, Labouret, Ghislaine, Wolfram, Tobias, Peyre, Hugo, Ramus, Franck·2023·Behavior Genetics

Abstract

UK Biobank participants do not have a high-quality measure of intelligence or polygenic scores (PGSs) of intelligence to simultaneously examine the genetic and neural underpinnings of intelligence. We created a standardized measure of general intelligence (g factor) relative to the UK population and estimated its quality. After running a GWAS of g on UK Biobank participants with a g factor of good quality and without neuroimaging data (N = 187,288), we derived a g PGS for UK Biobank participants with neuroimaging data. For individuals with at least one cognitive test, the g factor from eight cognitive tests (N = 501,650) explained 29% of the variance in cognitive test performance. The PGS for British individuals with neuroimaging data (N = 27,174) explained 7.6% of the variance in g. We provided high-quality g factor estimates for most UK Biobank participants and g factor PGSs for UK Biobank participants with neuroimaging data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10519-022-10127-6

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, C. M., Labouret, G., Wolfram, T., Peyre, H., & Ramus, F.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
Corresponding author
Williams, Camille Michèle
Venue
Behavior Genetics
Published
2022-11-15
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
85-100
ISSN
  • 0001-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3297
OpenAlex
W4309048360
Cited by
18
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-EURE-0017, ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02 PSL)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Physical Performance
Keywords
general intelligence, polygenic risk score, UK Biobank, cognitive tests, neuroimaging, cognitive performance
MeSH terms
Cognition, United Kingdom, Humans, Intelligence, Neuropsychological Tests, Biological Specimen Banks, Multifactorial Inheritance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review