Cited by 8Philosophical Ethics and TheoryPhilosophy and History of ScienceEvolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation

Social norms and superorganisms

Powell, Rachell·2023·Biology & Philosophy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10539-023-09909-x

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Avoiding building in any proximate mechanisms, such as specific neural substrates, to the working definition of consciousness is required.

    “And this requires taking care to avoid building in any proximate mechanisms, such as specific neural substrates, to the working definition of consciousness [50].”

    From Consciousness at sea (2025) · cites this paper as [50]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Powell, R.
Venue
Biology & Philosophy
Published
2023-05-22
Volume
38
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0169-3867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8404
OpenAlex
W4377226728
Cited by
8
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
13.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biology & Philosophy (publishedVersion)
Funders
Templeton World Charity Foundation (0469)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Keywords
social norms, normativity, superorganism, social insects, levels of selection, behavioral regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review