Cited by 7Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchPhilosophy and History of Science

What if worms were sentient? Insights into subjective experience from the Caenorhabditis elegans connectome

Open access
Zalucki, Oressia, Brown, Deborah J., Key, Brian·2023·Biology & Philosophy

Abstract

Deciphering the neural basis of subjective experience remains one of the great challenges in the natural sciences. The structural complexity and the limitations around invasive experimental manipulations of the human brain have impeded progress towards this goal. While animals cannot directly report first-person subjective experiences, their ability to exhibit flexible behaviours such as motivational trade-offs are generally considered evidence of sentience. The worm Caenorhabditis elegans affords the unique opportunity to describe the circuitry underlying subjective experience at a single cell level as its whole neural connectome is known and moreover, these animals exhibit motivational trade-offs. We started with the premise that these worms were sentient and then sought to understand the neurons that were both necessary and sufficient for a motivational trade-off involving the rewarding experience of food and the negative experience of an aversive odour. A simple hierarchical network consisting of two chemosensory neurons and three interneurons was found to produce an output to motoneurons that enabled worms to respond in a contextually appropriate manner to an aversive odour according to the worm's hunger state. Given that this circuitry is like that found in the human spinal cord, retina, and primary visual cortex, three regions which are neither necessary nor sufficient for subjective experience, we conclude that motivational trade-offs are not a criterion for subjective experience in worms. Furthermore, once the neural substrate for a behaviour is described, we question the explanatory role of subjective experience in behaviour.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10539-023-09924-y

Cites

171 of 171 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Caenorhabditis elegans must integrate information: the motivational value of food cues is downgraded after satiation, and different motivational drives mutually inhibit one another.

    “So, for example, there is a sense in which Caenorhabditis elegans must integrate information: the motivational value of (say) food cues is downgraded after satiation, and different motivational drives mutually inhibit one another (see [89] for a good review).”

    From Phenomenal interface theory: a model for basal consciousness (2025) · cites this paper as [89]

    The section ‘Neural circuitry generating flexible olfactory behaviours in C. elegans’ (page unavailable) describes AIB integrating food-related and aversive-odour inputs, with the worm’s response changing according to hunger state. It does not establish that satiation downgrades the motivational value of food cues or that different motivational drives mutually inhibit one another; the inhibition it describes is between specific neural signals. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Crump A et al (2022a) Sentience in decapod crustaceans: a general framework and review of the evi- dence. Anim Sentience 32:1
  2. Puccetti NA et al (2021) The neuroscience of affective dynamics. In: Waugh CE, Kuppens P (eds) Affect dynamics. Springer, Cambridge

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zalucki, O., Brown, D. J., & Key, B.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Key, Brian
Venue
Biology & Philosophy
Published
2023-08-23
Volume
38
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 0169-3867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8404
OpenAlex
W4386090991
Cited by
7
References
171
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Biology & Philosophy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Australian Research Council (DP200102909)
  • The University of Queensland
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
sentience, subjective experience, Caenorhabditis elegans, connectome, chemosensory neurons, interneurons, motor neurons, food reward, hunger, neural circuits, animal sentience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review