Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,056

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility

Greenwood, Michelle·2007·Journal of Business Ethics
DOI 10.1007/s10551-007-9509-y
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10551-007-9509-y

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Bauman Z. (1993) Postmodern Ethics. Routledge, London
  2. Bell E., Taylor S. (2003) The Elevation of Work: Pastoral Power and the New Age Work Ethic. Organization 10(2):329–349 · DOI
  3. Buchholz R. A., Rosenthal S. B. (2005) Toward a Contemporary Conceptual Framework for Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Business Ethics 58:137–148 · DOI
  4. Claydon T., Doyle M. (1996) Trusting Me, Trusting You? The Ethics of Employee Empowerment. Personnel Review 25(6):13–25 · DOI
  5. Crane A., Matten D. (2004) Business Ethics, a European Perspective: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  6. Deegan C. (2002) The Legitimising Effects of Social and Environmental Disclosures – A Theoretical Foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15(3):282–311 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Donaldson T. (2002) The Stakeholder Revolution and the Clarkson Principles. Business Ethics Quarterly 12(2):107–111 · DOI
  8. Donaldson T., Preston L. E. (1995) The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications. Academy of Management Review 20(1):65–91 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Evan W. M., Freeman R. E. (2004) A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism. In Beauchamp T. L., Bowie N. (eds.) Ethical Theory and Business. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
  10. Freeman R. E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston
  11. Frooman J. (1999) Stakeholder Influence Strategies. Academy of Management Review 24(2):191–205 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gibson K. (2000) The Moral Basis of Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Business Ethics 26(3):245–257 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Gray R. (2002) The Social Accounting Project and Accounting Organizations and Society. Accounting Organizations and Society 27(7):687–708 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Greenwood M. R. (2001) The Importance of Stakeholders According to Business Leaders. Business and Society Review 106(1):29–49 · DOI
  15. Hosmer L. T. (1995) Trust: The Connecting Link Between Organizational Theory and Philosophical Ethics. Academy of Management Review 20(2):379–403 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Jensen M. C. (2002) Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function. Business Ethics Quarterly 12(2):235–256 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Kaler J. (2002) Morality and Strategy in Stakeholder Identification. Journal of Business Ethics 39(1):91–99 · DOI
  18. Kaler J. (2003) Differentiating Stakeholder Theories. Journal of Business Ethics 46(1):71–83 · DOI
  19. Kamoche K. N. (2006) Managing People in Turbulent Economic Times: A Knowledge-creation and Appropriation Perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 44(1):25 · DOI
  20. Kaptein M., Wempe J. (1998) The Ethics Report: A Means of Sharing Responsibility. Business Ethics: A European Review 7(3):131–139 · DOI
  21. Knight P. (1998) Principles and Profits: Does There Have to be a Choice? The Shell Report 1998. The Royal Dutch Shell Group, London
  22. Kok P., van der Wiele T., McKenna R., Brown A. (2001) A Corporate Social Responsibility Audit Within a Quality Management Framework. Journal of Business Ethics 31:285–297 · DOI
  23. Legge K. (1995) Human Resource Management: Rhetorics and Reality. Macmillan, London · DOI · Paper page
  24. Livesey S. M., Kearins K. (2002) Transparent and Caring Corporations? A Study of Sustainability Reports by The Body Shop and Royal Dutch/Shell. Organization & Environment 15(3):233–258 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Maltby J., Wilkinson R. (1998) Stakeholding and Corporate Governance in the UK. Politics 18(3):197–204 · DOI
  26. Miles S. and A. L. Friedman: 2002, `Exploring the Social Construction of Stakeholder Management in the UK', Discussion Papers in Governance and Accountability No 02/008, Oxford Brookes University Business School
  27. Mitchell R. K., Agle B. R., Wood D. J. (1997) Towards a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review 22(4):853–886 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Moore G. (2004) The Institute of Business Ethics/European Business Ethics Network–UK Student Competition in Business Ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review 13(1):64 · DOI
  29. O’Dywer B.: (2003) Conceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility: The Nature of Managerial Capture. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 16(4):523–557 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Obi C. (1997) Globalisation and Local Resistance: The Case of the Ogoni versus Shell. New Political Economy 2(1):137–148 · DOI
  31. Owen D., Swift T. (2001) Social Accounting, Reporting and Auditing: Beyond the Rhetoric?. Business Ethics: A European Review 10(1):4–8 · DOI
  32. Owen D., Swift T., Hunt K. (2001) Questioning the Role of Stakeholder Engagement in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting. Accounting Forum 25(3):264–282 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Owen D., Swift T., Humphrey C., Bowerman M. (2000) The New Social Audits: Accountability, Managerial Capture or the Agenda of Social Champions?. European Accounting Review 9(1):81–98 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Phillips R. (1997) Stakeholder Theory and a Principle of Fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly 7(1):51–66 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Phillips R. (1999) On Stakeholder Delimitation. Business and Society 38:32–34
  36. Phillips R. (2003) Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, CA
  37. Power M. (2004) Counting, Control and Calculation: Reflections on Measuring and Management. Human Relations 57(6):765–783 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Rothschild J. (2000) Creating a Just and Democratic Workplace: More Engagement, Less Hierarchy. Contemporary Sociology 29(1):195–211 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Rowan J. R. (2000) The Moral Foundation of Employee Rights. Journal of Business Ethics 24(4):355–361 · DOI
  40. Scherer A. G. and G. Palazzo: 2007, ‹Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility. Business and Society Seen From a Habermasian Perspective’, Academy of Management Review 32(4), forthcoming · DOI · Paper page
  41. Sillanpaa M. (1998) The Body Shop Values Report – Towards Integrated Stakeholder Auditing. Journal of Business Ethics 17(13):1443–1456 · DOI
  42. Slinger G. (2000) Essays on Stakeholders and Takeovers. Cambridge University, Cambridge
  43. Sternberg E. (1999) The Stakeholder Concept: A Mistaken Doctrine. Foundations for Business Responsibilities, UK
  44. Sweeney M. and R. Estes: 2000, ‹Corporate Social Reporting and the Sunshine Standards: Is there Light at the End of the Tunnel?’, In B. E. R. U. (ed.), Proceedings of the Ethical Governance and Management Conference: Costs and Benefits. Victoria University, Melbourne Australia
  45. Swift T. (2001) Trust, Reputation and Corporate Accountability to Stakeholders. Business Ethics: A European Review 10(1):16–26 · DOI · Paper page
  46. ten Bos R., Willmott H. (2001) Towards a Post-dualistic Business Ethics: Interweaving Reason and Emotion in Working Life. Journal of Management Studies 38(6):769–793 · DOI
  47. Ten C. (1980) Mill on Liberty. Clarendon Press, Oxford
  48. UNEP (2000) Engaging Stakeholders: The Global Reporters. United Nations Environment Programme, London
  49. Van Buren III H. (2001) If Fairness is the Problem, is Consent the Solution? Integrating ISCT and Stakeholder Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly 11(3):481–499 · DOI
  50. Wheeler D., Boele R., Fabig H. (2002) Paradoxes and Dilemmas for Stakeholder Responsive Firms in the Extractive Sector – Lessons from the Case of Shell and the Ogoni. Journal of Business Ethics 39(3):297–318 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Wicks A. C., Gilbert J., Daniel R., Freeman R. E. (1994) A Feminist Reinterpretation of the Stakeholder Concept. Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4):475–497 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Wicks A. C., Berman S. L., Jones T. M. (1999) The Structure of Optimal Trust: Moral and Strategic Implications. Academy of Management Review 24(1):99–116 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Windsor D. (2001) The Future of Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 9:225–256 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,056

Metadata

Authors
Greenwood, M.
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2007-07-24
Volume
74
Issue
4
Pages
315-327
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
DOI
10.1007/s10551-007-9509-y
OpenAlex
W2024003924
Cited by
1,056
References
3
FWCI
34.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10551-007-9509-y
The paper
Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9509-y

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.