Cited by 417Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEthics in Business and EducationWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership

Work Engagement and Machiavellianism in the Ethical Leadership Process

Open access
Den Hartog, Deanne N., Belschak, Frank D.·2012·Journal of Business Ethics

Abstract

Leaders who express an ethical identity are proposed to affect followers’ attitudes and work behaviors. In two multi-source studies, we first test a model suggesting that work engagement acts as a mediator in the relationships between ethical leadership and employee initiative (a form of organizational citizenship behavior) as well as counterproductive work behavior. Next, we focus on whether ethical leadership always forms an authentic expression of an ethical identity, thus in the second study, we add leader Machiavellianism to the model. For Machiavellian leaders, the publicly expressed identity of ethical leadership is inconsistent with the privately held unethical Machiavellian norms. Literature on surface acting suggests people can at least to some extent pick up on such inauthentic displays, making the effects less strong. We thus argue that the positive effects of ethical leader behavior are likely to be suppressed when leaders are highly Machiavellian. Support for this moderated mediation model was found: The effects of ethical leader behavior on engagement are less strong when ethical leaders are high as opposed to low on Machiavellianism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10551-012-1296-4

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Den Hartog, D. N., & Belschak, F. D.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Published
2012-04
Volume
107
Issue
1
Pages
35-47
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
OpenAlex
W2154533371
Cited by
417
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
FWCI
40.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Keywords
ethical leadership, Machiavellianism, work engagement, employee initiative, organizational citizenship behavior, counterproductive work behavior, moral identity, surface acting, leader authenticity, moderated mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review