CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transposable elements: genome innovation, chromosome diversity, and centromere conflict

Klein, Savannah J., O’Neill, Rachel J.·2018·Chromosome Research
DOI 10.1007/s10577-017-9569-5PMC PMC5857280
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10577-017-9569-5

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 The impact of TEs on the genome. a From left: insertion of a TE (red) into an exon and incorporation into the final mRNA; insertion of a TE (red) into an intron and contribution of splice donor and acceptor sites that lead to splicing of the TE into the mRNA; insertion of a TE (red) into a 3′ UTR with concomitant use of an alternative splice donor (asterisk) within the last exon and use of a splice acceptor within the TE, resulting in an alternative 3′ UTR including the TE. b Insertion of a TE (red) into a target site (arrowhead) results in various insertional mutations, right. From top: insertion of TE and TSDs; insertion of TE and TSDs with a small deletion in the right TSD; insertion of the TE, TSDs, and a local mRNA transcript (blue) as a retroduplication. c Insertion of a TE upstream of a coding region can result in, from left: establishment of a new promoter; enhanced transcription; localized silencing due to methylation of the TE (red lollipops). d (Top) NAHR events between two related TEs (red and orange) in tandem on either the same strand or different strands of DNA can result in duplications or deletions. (Bottom) NAHR events between inverted TEs results in an inversion
Fig. 1 The impact of TEs on the genome. a From left: insertion of a TE (red) into an exon and incorporation into the final mRNA; insertion of a TE (red) into an intron and contribution of splice donor and acceptor sites that lead to splicing of the TE into the mRNA; insertion of a TE (red) into a 3′ UTR with concomitant use of an alternative splice donor (asterisk) within the last exon and use of a splice acceptor within the TE, resulting in an alternative 3′ UTR including the TE. b Insertion of a TE (red) into a target site (arrowhead) results in various insertional mutations, right. From top: insertion of TE and TSDs; insertion of TE and TSDs with a small deletion in the right TSD; insertion of the TE, TSDs, and a local mRNA transcript (blue) as a retroduplication. c Insertion of a TE upstream of a coding region can result in, from left: establishment of a new promoter; enhanced transcription; localized silencing due to methylation of the TE (red lollipops). d (Top) NAHR events between two related TEs (red and orange) in tandem on either the same strand or different strands of DNA can result in duplications or deletions. (Bottom) NAHR events between inverted TEs results in an inversionCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 a (Top) The structure of a centromere following homogenization of a stable satellite (gradient arrowheads) results in arrays of satellites, each sharing 70–80% identity, which are then organized in a tandem higher order array, with each block of satellites (dotted arrowheads), known as a HOR, sharing 97–99% identity. Random insertions of TEs (colored bars) are found interspersed among the HORs. (Bottom) Illustration of the graphical map of the same centromere shown in A, with bubbles on the inner circle representing each monomer satellite and how it is arranged in relation to other monomers in the array. Gradient bubbles correspond to gradient arrowheads. Lines indicate respective satellite or TE neighbor for each satellite. TE insertions and their relative location with respect to specific monomers are indicated by solid bubbles linked to the inner circle. b The structure of a complex centromere, exemplified by maize, rice, and potato, is characterized by diverse TEs (colored bars) and variable satellites (gradient arrowheads). c The structure of a neocentromere in which a single transcriptionally active mobile element (pink) inserted into non-centromeric DNA (gray). Arrowhead indicates promoter activity
Fig. 2 a (Top) The structure of a centromere following homogenization of a stable satellite (gradient arrowheads) results in arrays of satellites, each sharing 70–80% identity, which are then organized in a tandem higher order array, with each block of satellites (dotted arrowheads), known as a HOR, sharing 97–99% identity. Random insertions of TEs (colored bars) are found interspersed among the HORs. (Bottom) Illustration of the graphical map of the same centromere shown in A, with bubbles on the inner circle representing each monomer satellite and how it is arranged in relation to other monomers in the array. Gradient bubbles correspond to gradient arrowheads. Lines indicate respective satellite or TE neighbor for each satellite. TE insertions and their relative location with respect to specific monomers are indicated by solid bubbles linked to the inner circle. b The structure of a complex centromere, exemplified by maize, rice, and potato, is characterized by diverse TEs (colored bars) and variable satellites (gradient arrowheads). c The structure of a neocentromere in which a single transcriptionally active mobile element (pink) inserted into non-centromeric DNA (gray). Arrowhead indicates promoter activityCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 TEs and the evolution of centromeres. An initial destabilization event leads to the formation of a neocentromere (black dot indicates new centromere location, open circle indicates former centromere location on an ideogram representation of a chromosome), linked to the transcription of a TE (purple) in the absence of satellite DNA (gray). Following recruitment of CENP-A nucleosomes (yellow), more TEs insertions occur and incorporation of CENP-A nucleosomes (yellow, other H3-containing nucleosomes are indicated by blue) spread to form a complex centromere. As the complex centromere establishes an equilibrium state, TEs accumulate and satellites (arrowheads) begin to emerge. While individual variation in the placement of CENP-A nucleosomes (CENP-A containing nucleosomes are yellow, other centromeric H3-nucleosomes are blue, non-centromeric nucleosomes are brown) can exist within a population, the average centromere domain is relatively stable. At this stage of centromere evolution, interchromosomal movement of TEs can influence homogenization of arrays across non-homologous chromosomes. Finally, a dominant satellite emerges that subsequently forms higher order arrays with only intermittent TE insertions. Following a chromosome destabilization event, the HOR is either inactivated by unknown mechanisms, or lost due to chromosome damage, and a new centromere emerges in a different location
Fig. 3 TEs and the evolution of centromeres. An initial destabilization event leads to the formation of a neocentromere (black dot indicates new centromere location, open circle indicates former centromere location on an ideogram representation of a chromosome), linked to the transcription of a TE (purple) in the absence of satellite DNA (gray). Following recruitment of CENP-A nucleosomes (yellow), more TEs insertions occur and incorporation of CENP-A nucleosomes (yellow, other H3-containing nucleosomes are indicated by blue) spread to form a complex centromere. As the complex centromere establishes an equilibrium state, TEs accumulate and satellites (arrowheads) begin to emerge. While individual variation in the placement of CENP-A nucleosomes (CENP-A containing nucleosomes are yellow, other centromeric H3-nucleosomes are blue, non-centromeric nucleosomes are brown) can exist within a population, the average centromere domain is relatively stable. At this stage of centromere evolution, interchromosomal movement of TEs can influence homogenization of arrays across non-homologous chromosomes. Finally, a dominant satellite emerges that subsequently forms higher order arrays with only intermittent TE insertions. Following a chromosome destabilization event, the HOR is either inactivated by unknown mechanisms, or lost due to chromosome damage, and a new centromere emerges in a different locationCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 163

  1. Ahmed M, Liang P (2012) Transposable elements are a significant contributor to tandem repeats in the human genome. Comp Funct Genomics 2012:947089. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/947089 · DOI
  2. Alazami AM, Mejia JE, Monaco ZL (2004) Human artificial chromosomes containing chromosome 17 alphoid DNA maintain an active centromere in murine cells but are not stable. Genomics 83:844–851 · DOI
  3. Alisch RS, Garcia-Perez JL, Muotri AR, Gage FH, Moran JV (2006) Unconventional translation of mammalian LINE-1 retrotransposons. Genes Dev 20:210–224. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1380406 · DOI
  4. Alkan C et al (2011) Genome-wide characterization of centromeric satellites from multiple mammalian genomes. Genome Res 21:137–145. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.111278.110 · DOI
  5. Alonso A et al (2007) Co-localization of CENP-C and CENP-H to discontinuous domains of CENP-A chromatin at human neocentromeres. Genome Biol 8:R148 · DOI
  6. Amor DJ, Bentley K, Ryan J, Perry J, Wong L, Slater H, Choo KH (2004) Human centromere repositioning “in progress”. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 101:6542–6547. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0308637101 · DOI
  7. Aravin AA, Klenov MS, Vagin VV, Bantignies F, Cavalli G, Gvozdev VA (2004) Dissection of a natural RNA silencing process in the Drosophila melanogaster germ line. Mol Cell Biol 24:6742–6750. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.15.6742-6750.2004 · DOI
  8. Bagijn MP et al (2012) Function, targets, and evolution of Caenorhabditis elegans piRNAs. Science 337:574–578. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1220952 · DOI
  9. Bailey JA, Liu G, Eichler EE (2003) An Alu transposition model for the origin and expansion of human segmental duplications. Am J Hum Genet 73:823–834. https://doi.org/10.1086/378594 · DOI
  10. Belshaw R, Dawson AL, Woolven-Allen J, Redding J, Burt A, Tristem M (2005) Genomewide screening reveals high levels of insertional polymorphism in the human endogenous retrovirus family HERV-K(HML2): implications for present-day activity. J Virol 79:12507–12514. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.79.19.12507-12514.2005 · DOI
  11. Belshaw R, Pereira V, Katzourakis A, Talbot G, Paces J, Burt A, Tristem M (2004) Long-term reinfection of the human genome by endogenous retroviruses. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 101:4894–4899. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307800101 · DOI
  12. Bergmann JH et al (2012) Epigenetic engineering: histone H3K9 acetylation is compatible with kinetochore structure and function. J Cell Sci 125:411–421. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.090639 · DOI
  13. Bergmann JH et al (2011) Epigenetic engineering shows H3K4me2 is required for HJURP targeting and CENP-A assembly on a synthetic human kinetochore. EMBO J 30:328–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2010.329 · DOI
  14. Birchler JA, Presting GG (2012) Retrotransposon insertion targeting: a mechanism for homogenization of centromere sequences on nonhomologous chromosomes. Genes Dev 26:638–640. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.191049.112 · DOI
  15. Boller K, Konig H, Sauter M, Mueller-Lantzsch N, Lower R, Lower J, Kurth R (1993) Evidence that HERV-K is the endogenous retrovirus sequence that codes for the human teratocarcinoma-derived retrovirus HTDV. Virology 196:349–353. https://doi.org/10.1006/viro.1993.1487 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Brown JD, Mitchell SE, O'Neill RJ (2012) Making a long story short: noncoding RNAs and chromosome change. Heredity (Edinb) 108:42–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2011.104 · DOI
  17. Brown JD, O'Neill RJ (2010) Chromosomes, conflict, and epigenetics: chromosomal speciation revisited. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 11:291–316. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141554 · DOI
  18. Bulazel K, Ferreri GC, Eldridge MD, O'Neill RJ (2007) Species-specific shifts in centromere sequence composition are coincident with breakpoint reuse in karyotypically divergent lineages. Genome Biol 8:R170 · DOI
  19. Bulazel K, Metcalfe C, Ferreri GC, Yu J, Eldridge MD, O'Neill RJ (2006) Cytogenetic and molecular evaluation of centromere-associated DNA sequences from a marsupial (Macropodidae: Macropus rufogriseus) X chromosome. Genetics 172:1129–1137. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.047654 · DOI
  20. Burns KH (2017) Transposable elements in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 17:415–424. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2017.35 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Byun HM, Heo K, Mitchell KJ, Yang AS (2012) Mono-allelic retrotransposon insertion addresses epigenetic transcriptional repression in human genome. J Biomed Sci 19:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1423-0127-19-13 · DOI
  22. Carbone L, Alan Harris R, Gnerre S, Veeramah KR, Lorente-Galdos B, Huddleston J, Meyer TJ, Herrero J, Roos C, Aken B, Anaclerio F, Archidiacono N, Baker C, Barrell D, Batzer MA, Beal K, Blancher A, Bohrson CL, Brameier M, Campbell MS, Capozzi O, Casola C, Chiatante G, Cree A, Damert A, de Jong PJ, Dumas L, Fernandez-Callejo M, Flicek P, Fuchs NV, Gut I, Gut M, Hahn MW, Hernandez-Rodriguez J, Hillier LDW, Hubley R, Ianc B, Izsvák Z, Jablonski NG, Johnstone LM, Karimpour-Fard A, Konkel MK, Kostka D, Lazar NH, Lee SL, Lewis LR, Liu Y, Locke DP, Mallick S, Mendez FL, Muffato M, Nazareth LV, Nevonen KA, O’Bleness M, Ochis C, Odom DT, Pollard KS, Quilez J, Reich D, Rocchi M, Schumann GG, Searle S, Sikela JM, Skollar G, Smit A, Sonmez K, Hallers B, Terhune E, Thomas GWC, Ullmer B, Ventura M, Walker JA, Wall JD, Walter L, Ward MC, Wheelan SJ, Whelan CW, White S, Wilhelm LJ, Woerner AE, Yandell M, Zhu B, Hammer MF, Marques-Bonet T, Eichler EE, Fulton L, Fronick C, Muzny DM, Warren WC, Worley KC, Rogers J, Wilson RK, Gibbs RA (2014) Gibbon genome and the fast karyotype evolution of small apes. Nature 513(7517):195–201. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13679 · DOI
  23. Carbone L et al (2012) Centromere remodeling in Hoolock leuconedys (Hylobatidae) by a new transposable element unique to the gibbons. Genome Biol Evol 4:648–658. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evs048 · DOI
  24. Carone DM, Longo MS, Ferreri GC, Hall L, Harris M, Shook N, Bulazel KV, Carone BR, Obergfell C, O’Neill MJ, O’Neill RJ (2009) A new class of retroviral and satellite encoded small RNAs emanates from mammalian centromeres. Chromosoma 118(1):113–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-008-0181-5 · DOI
  25. Carone DM, Zhang C, Hall LE, Obergfell C, Carone BR, O'Neill MJ, O'Neill RJ (2013) Hypermorphic expression of centromeric retroelement-encoded small RNAs impairs CENP-A loading. Chromosom Res 21:49–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-013-9337-0 · DOI
  26. Chen CC et al (2015) Establishment of centromeric chromatin by the CENP-A assembly factor CAL1 requires FACT-mediated transcription. Dev Cell 34:73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.05.012 · DOI
  27. Chueh AC, Northrop EL, Brettingham-Moore KH, Choo KH, Wong LH (2009) LINE retrotransposon RNA is an essential structural and functional epigenetic component of a core neocentromeric chromatin. PLoS Genet 5:e1000354. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000354 · DOI
  28. Chuong EB, Elde NC, Feschotte C (2017) Regulatory activities of transposable elements: from conflicts to benefits. Nat Rev Genet 18:71–86. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2016.139 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Colnaghi R, Carpenter G, Volker M, O'Driscoll M (2011) The consequences of structural genomic alterations in humans: genomic disorders, genomic instability and cancer. Semin Cell Dev Biol 22:875–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2011.07.010 · DOI
  30. Contreras-Galindo R et al (2013) HIV infection reveals widespread expansion of novel centromeric human endogenous retroviruses. Genome Res 23:1505–1513. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.144303.112 · DOI
  31. Cordaux R, Batzer MA (2009) The impact of retrotransposons on human genome evolution. Nat Rev Genet 10:691–703. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2640 · DOI
  32. Craig NL (1995) Unity in transposition reactions. Science 270:253–254 · DOI
  33. Dai L, LaCava J, Taylor MS, Boeke JD (2014) Expression and detection of LINE-1 ORF-encoded proteins. Mob Genet Elements 4:e29319. https://doi.org/10.4161/mge.29319 · DOI
  34. Dawe RK (2003) RNA interference, transposons, and the centromere. Plant Cell 15:297–301 · DOI
  35. Deininger PL, Batzer MA (1999) Alu repeats and human disease. Mol Genet Metab 67(3):183–193. https://doi.org/10.1006/mgme.1999.2864 · DOI
  36. Denli AM et al (2015) Primate-specific ORF0 contributes to retrotransposon-mediated diversity. Cell 163:583–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.025 · DOI
  37. Dewannieux M, Esnault C, Heidmann T (2003) LINE-mediated retrotransposition of marked Alu sequences. Nat Genet 35:41–48. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1223 · DOI
  38. Dias GB, Svartman M, Delprat A, Ruiz A, Kuhn GC (2014) Tetris provided the building blocks for an emerging satellite DNA of Drosophila virilis. Genome Biol Evol 6:1302–1313. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evu108 · DOI
  39. Domansky AN, Kopantzev EP, Snezhkov EV, Lebedev YB, Leib-Mosch C, Sverdlov ED (2000) Solitary HERV-K LTRs possess bi-directional promoter activity and contain a negative regulatory element in the U5 region. FEBS Lett 472:191–195 · DOI
  40. Doolittle WF, Sapienza C (1980) Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution. Nature 284:601–603 · DOI
  41. Dover G (1982) Molecular drive: a cohesive mode of species evolution. Nature 299(5879):111–117. https://doi.org/10.1038/299111a0 · DOI
  42. Dover GA, Strachan T, Coen ES, Brown SD (1982) Molecular drive. Science 218:1069 · DOI
  43. Emanuel BS, Shaikh TH (2001) Segmental duplications: an ‘expanding’ role in genomic instability and disease. Nat Rev Genet 2(10):791–800. https://doi.org/10.1038/35093500 · DOI
  44. Emmons SW, Yesner L, Ruan KS, Katzenberg D (1983) Evidence for a transposon in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell 32:55–65 · DOI
  45. Fanning T, Singer M (1987a) The LINE-1 DNA sequences in four mammalian orders predict proteins that conserve homologies to retrovirus proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 15:2251–2260 · DOI
  46. Fanning TG, Singer MF (1987b) LINE-1: a mammalian transposable element. Biochim Biophys Acta 910:203–212 · DOI
  47. Ferreri GC, Liscinsky DM, Mack JA, Eldridge MD, O'Neill RJ (2005) Retention of latent centromeres in the mammalian genome. J Hered 96:217–224. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esi029 · DOI
  48. Ferreri GC, Marzelli M, Rens W, O'Neill RJ (2004) A centromere-specific retroviral element associated with breaks of synteny in macropodine marsupials. Cytogenet Genome Res 107:115–118. https://doi.org/10.1159/000079580 · DOI
  49. Fontdevila A (2005) Hybrid genome evolution by transposition. Cytogenet Genome Res 110:49–55. https://doi.org/10.1159/000084937 · DOI
  50. Gent JI, Wang N, Dawe RK (2017) Stable centromere positioning in diverse sequence contexts of complex and satellite centromeres of maize and wild relatives. Genome Biol 18:121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1249-4 · DOI
  51. Gilbert N, Lutz S, Morrish TA, Moran JV (2005) Multiple fates of L1 retrotransposition intermediates in cultured human cells. Mol Cell Biol 25:7780–7795. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.17.7780-7795.2005 · DOI
  52. Gong Z et al (2012) Repeatless and repeat-based centromeres in potato: implications for centromere evolution. Plant Cell 24:3559–3574. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.112.100511 · DOI
  53. Goodier JL, Kazazian HH Jr (2008) Retrotransposons revisited: the restraint and rehabilitation of parasites. Cell 135(1):23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.022 · DOI
  54. Guerra M, Cabral G, Cuacos M, Gonzalez-Garcia M, Gonzalez-Sanchez M, Vega J, Puertas MJ (2010) Neocentrics and holokinetics (holocentrics): chromosomes out of the centromeric rules. Cytogenet Genome Res 129:82–96. https://doi.org/10.1159/000314289 · DOI
  55. Hackett JA et al (2012) Promoter DNA methylation couples genome-defence mechanisms to epigenetic reprogramming in the mouse germline. Development 139:3623–3632. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.081661 · DOI
  56. Han K, Lee J, Meyer TJ, Remedios P, Goodwin L, Batzer MA (2008) L1 recombination-associated deletions generate human genomic variation. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 105:19366–19371. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0807866105 · DOI
  57. Hancks DC, Kazazian HH Jr (2012) Active human retrotransposons: variation and disease. Curr Opin Genet Dev 22:191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2012.02.006 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Hasson D, Alonso A, Cheung F, Tepperberg JH, Papenhausen PR, Engelen JJ, Warburton PE (2011) Formation of novel CENP-A domains on tandem repetitive DNA and across chromosome breakpoints on human chromosome 8q21 neocentromeres. Chromosoma 120:621–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-011-0337-6 · DOI
  59. Hasson D et al (2013) The octamer is the major form of CENP-A nucleosomes at human centromeres. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:687–695. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2562 · DOI
  60. Henikoff S, Ahmad K, Malik H (2001) The centromere paradox: stable inheritance with rapidly evolving DNA. Science 293:1098–1102. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062939 · DOI
  61. Henikoff S, Malik HS (2002) Centromeres: selfish drivers. Nature 417:227. https://doi.org/10.1038/417227a · DOI
  62. Horman SR, Svoboda P, Luning Prak ET (2006) The potential regulation of L1 mobility by RNA interference. J Biomed Biotechnol 2006:32713. https://doi.org/10.1155/JBB/2006/32713 · DOI
  63. Huang CR, Burns KH, Boeke JD (2012) Active transposition in genomes. Annu Rev Genet 46:651–675. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155616 · DOI
  64. Hughes JF, Coffin JM (2004) Human endogenous retrovirus K solo-LTR formation and insertional polymorphisms: implications for human and viral evolution. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 101:1668–1672. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307885100 · DOI
  65. Ikeda Y, Nishimura T (2015) The role of DNA methylation in transposable element silencing and genomic imprinting. In: Pontes O, Jin H (eds) Nuclear functions in plant transcription. Signaling and Development. Springer New York, New York, pp 13–29 · DOI
  66. Johnson ME, Rowsey RA, Shirley S, Vandevoort C, Bailey J, Hassold T (2013) A specific family of interspersed repeats (SINEs) facilitates meiotic synapsis in mammals. Mol Cytogenet 6(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8166-6-1 · DOI
  67. Kalmykova AI, Klenov MS, Gvozdev VA (2005) Argonaute protein PIWI controls mobilization of retrotransposons in the Drosophila male germline. Nucleic Acids Res 33:2052–2059. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki323 · DOI
  68. Kang MI, Rhyu MG, Kim YH, Jung YC, Hong SJ, Cho CS, Kim HS (2006) The length of CpG islands is associated with the distribution of Alu and L1 retroelements. Genomics 87:580–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.01.002 · DOI
  69. Karpen GH, Allshire RC (1997) The case for epigenetic effects on centromere identity and function. Trends Genet 13:489–496 · DOI
  70. Kawabe A, Nasuda S (2005) Structure and genomic organization of centromeric repeats in Arabidopsis species. Mol Gen Genomics 272:593–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-004-1081-x · DOI
  71. Kazazian HH Jr, Wong C, Youssoufian H, Scott AF, Phillips DG, Antonarakis SE (1988) Haemophilia A resulting from de novo insertion of L1 sequences represents a novel mechanism for mutation in man. Nature 332:164–166. https://doi.org/10.1038/332164a0 · DOI
  72. Ketting RF, Haverkamp TH, van Luenen HG, Plasterk RH (1999) Mut-7 of C. elegans, required for transposon silencing and RNA interference, is a homolog of Werner syndrome helicase and RNaseD. Cell 99:133–141 · DOI
  73. Kipling D, Warburton PE (1997) Centromeres, CENP-B and Tigger too. Trends Genet 13:141–145 · DOI
  74. Kuznetsova I, Podgornaya O, Ferguson-Smith MA (2006) High-resolution organization of mouse centromeric and pericentromeric DNA. Cytogenet Genome Res 112:248–255 · DOI
  75. Lander ES et al (2001) Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409:860–921. https://doi.org/10.1038/35057062 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Lavie L, Maldener E, Brouha B, Meese EU, Mayer J (2004) The human L1 promoter: variable transcription initiation sites and a major impact of upstream flanking sequence on promoter activity. Genome Res 14:2253–2260. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.2745804 · DOI
  77. Lee J, Han K, Meyer TJ, Kim HS, Batzer MA (2008) Chromosomal inversions between human and chimpanzee lineages caused by retrotransposons. PLoS One 3:e4047. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004047 · DOI
  78. Leupin O, Attanasio C, Marguerat S, Tapernoux M, Antonarakis SE, Conrad B (2005) Transcriptional activation by bidirectional RNA polymerase II elongation over a silent promoter. EMBO Rep 6:956–960. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400502 · DOI
  79. Lippman Z et al (2004) Role of transposable elements in heterochromatin and epigenetic control. Nature 430:471–476. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02651 · DOI · Paper page
  80. Lo AW, Magliano DJ, Sibson MC, Kalitsis P, Craig JM, Choo KH (2001) A novel chromatin immunoprecipitation and array (CIA) analysis identifies a 460-kb CENP-A-binding neocentromere DNA. Genome Res 11:448–457 · DOI
  81. Lobachev KS, Stenger JE, Kozyreva OG, Jurka J, Gordenin DA, Resnick MA (2000) Inverted Alu repeats unstable in yeast are excluded from the human genome. EMBO J 19:3822–3830. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/19.14.3822 · DOI
  82. Longo MS, Carone DM, Green ED, O'Neill MJ, O'Neill RJ (2009) Distinct retroelement classes define evolutionary breakpoints demarcating sites of evolutionary novelty. BMC Genomics 10:334. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-334 · DOI
  83. Lower R, Tonjes RR, Korbmacher C, Kurth R, Lower J (1995) Identification of a Rev-related protein by analysis of spliced transcripts of the human endogenous retroviruses HTDV/HERV-K. J Virol 69:141–149 · DOI
  84. Malik HS, Henikoff S (2002) Conflict begets complexity: the evolution of centromeres. Curr Opin Genet Dev 12:711–718 · DOI
  85. Malik HS, Henikoff S (2009) Major evolutionary transitions in centromere complexity. Cell 138:1067–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.08.036 · DOI
  86. Maloney KA, Sullivan LL, Matheny JE, Strome ED, Merrett SL, Ferris A, Sullivan BA (2012) Functional epialleles at an endogenous human centromere. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 109:13704–13709. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1203126109 · DOI
  87. Marcon HS, Domingues DS, Silva JC, Borges RJ, Matioli FF, Fontes MR, Marino CL (2015) Transcriptionally active LTR retrotransposons in Eucalyptus genus are differentially expressed and insertionally polymorphic. BMC Plant Biol 15:198. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-015-0550-1 · DOI
  88. Marshall OJ, Chueh AC, Wong LH, Choo KH (2008) Neocentromeres: new insights into centromere structure, disease development, and karyotype evolution. Am J Hum Genet 82:261–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.11.009 · DOI
  89. Martens JH, O'Sullivan RJ, Braunschweig U, Opravil S, Radolf M, Steinlein P, Jenuwein T (2005) The profile of repeat-associated histone lysine methylation states in the mouse epigenome. EMBO J 24:800–812. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600545 · DOI
  90. May BP, Lippman ZB, Fang Y, Spector DL, Martienssen RA (2005) Differential regulation of strand-specific transcripts from Arabidopsis centromeric satellite repeats. PLOS Genet 1:e79 · DOI
  91. McClintock B (1950) The origin and behavior of mutable loci in maize. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 36:344–355 · DOI
  92. McLaughlin RN Jr, Malik HS (2017) Genetic conflicts: the usual suspects and beyond. J Exp Biol 220:6–17. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.148148 · DOI
  93. Mejia JE, Alazami A, Willmott A, Marschall P, Levy E, Earnshaw WC, Larin Z (2002) Efficiency of de novo centromere formation in human artificial chromosomes. Genomics 79:297–304 · DOI
  94. Melters DP et al (2013) Comparative analysis of tandem repeats from hundreds of species reveals unique insights into centromere evolution. Genome Biol 14:R10. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-1-r10 · DOI
  95. Mestrovic N, Mravinac B, Pavlek M, Vojvoda-Zeljko T, Satovic E, Plohl M (2015) Structural and functional liaisons between transposable elements and satellite DNAs. Chromosom Res 23:583–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-015-9483-7 · DOI
  96. Metcalfe CJ et al (2007) Genomic instability within centromeres of interspecific marsupial hybrids. Genetics 177:2507–2517. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.082313 · DOI
  97. Meyer TJ, Held U, Nevonen KA, Klawitter S, Pirzer T, Carbone L, Schumann GG (2016) The flow of the gibbon LAVA element is facilitated by the LINE-1 retrotransposition machinery. Genome Biol Evol 8:3209–3225. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evw224 · DOI
  98. Miga KH (2015) Completing the human genome: the progress and challenge of satellite DNA assembly. Chromosom Res 23:421–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-015-9488-2 · DOI
  99. Miga KH, Newton Y, Jain M, Altemose N, Willard HF, Kent WJ (2014) Centromere reference models for human chromosomes X and Y satellite arrays. Genome Res 24(4):697–707. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.159624.113 · DOI
  100. Mills RE, Bennett EA, Iskow RC, Devine SE (2007) Which transposable elements are active in the human genome? Trends Genet 23(4):183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2007.02.006 · DOI
  101. Morrish TA et al (2002) DNA repair mediated by endonuclease-independent LINE-1 retrotransposition. Nat Genet 31:159–165. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng898 · DOI
  102. Nagaki K et al (2004) Sequencing of a rice centromere uncovers active genes. Nat Genet 36:138–145 · DOI
  103. Nagaki K, Neumann P, Zhang D, Ouyang S, Buell CR, Cheng Z, Jiang J (2005) Structure, divergence, and distribution of the CRR centromeric retrotransposon family in rice. Mol Biol Evol 22:845–855. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msi069 · DOI
  104. Nakano M et al (2008) Inactivation of a human kinetochore by specific targeting of chromatin modifiers. Dev Cell 14:507–522 · DOI
  105. Nakano M, Okamoto Y, Ohzeki J, Masumoto H (2003) Epigenetic assembly of centromeric chromatin at ectopic alpha-satellite sites on human chromosomes. J Cell Sci 116(19):4021–4034. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00697 · DOI
  106. Narita N et al (1993) Insertion of a 5′ truncated L1 element into the 3′ end of exon 44 of the dystrophin gene resulted in skipping of the exon during splicing in a case of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Clin Invest 91:1862–1867. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI116402 · DOI
  107. Neumann P, Yan H, Jiang J (2007) The centromeric retrotransposons of rice are transcribed and differentially processed by RNA interference. Genetics 176:749–761. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.071902 · DOI
  108. O'Neill RJ, Carone DM (2009) The role of ncRNA in centromeres: a lesson from marsupials. Prog Mol Subcell Biol 48:77–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00182-6_4 · DOI
  109. O'Neill RJ, Eldridge MD, Metcalfe CJ (2004) Centromere dynamics and chromosome evolution in marsupials. J Hered 95:375–381. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esh063 · DOI
  110. O'Neill RJ, O'Neill MJ, Graves JA (1998) Undermethylation associated with retroelement activation and chromosome remodelling in an interspecific mammalian hybrid. Nature 393:68–72 · DOI
  111. Okamoto Y, Nakano M, Ohzeki J, Larionov V, Masumoto H (2007) A minimal CENP-A core is required for nucleation and maintenance of a functional human centromere. EMBO J 26:1279–1291 · DOI
  112. Ono M (1990) Molecular biology of type A endogenous retrovirus. Kitasato Arch Exp Med 63:77–90
  113. Orgel LE, Crick FH (1980) Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite. Nature 284:604–607 · DOI
  114. Ostertag EM, Goodier JL, Zhang Y, Kazazian HH Jr (2003) SVA elements are nonautonomous retrotransposons that cause disease in humans. Am J Hum Genet 73:1444–1451. https://doi.org/10.1086/380207 · DOI
  115. Panning B, Smiley JR (1993) Activation of RNA polymerase III transcription of human Alu repetitive elements by adenovirus type 5: requirement for the E1b 58-kilodalton protein and the products of E4 open reading frames 3 and 6. Mol Cell Biol 13:3231–3244 · DOI
  116. Phillips CM, Brown KC, Montgomery BE, Ruvkun G, Montgomery TA (2015) piRNAs and piRNA-dependent siRNAs protect conserved and essential C. elegans genes from misrouting into the RNAi pathway. Dev Cell 34:457–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.07.009 · DOI
  117. Piras FM et al (2010) Uncoupling of satellite DNA and centromeric function in the genus Equus. PLoS Genet 6:e1000845. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000845 · DOI
  118. Quenet D, Dalal Y (2014) A long non-coding RNA is required for targeting centromeric protein A to the human centromere. eLife 3:e03254. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03254 · DOI
  119. Quentin Y (1992) Origin of the Alu family: a family of Alu-like monomers gave birth to the left and the right arms of the Alu elements. Nucleic Acids Res 20:3397–3401 · DOI
  120. Raiz J et al (2012) The non-autonomous retrotransposon SVA is trans-mobilized by the human LINE-1 protein machinery. Nucleic Acids Res 40:1666–1683. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr863 · DOI
  121. Rishishwar L, Tellez Villa CE, Jordan IK (2015) Transposable element polymorphisms recapitulate human evolution. Mob DNA 6:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13100-015-0052-6 · DOI
  122. Rogers RL (2015) Chromosomal rearrangements as barriers to genetic homogenization between archaic and modern humans. Mol Biol Evol 32:3064–3078. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msv204 · DOI
  123. Rosenbloom KR et al (2015) The UCSC genome browser database: 2015 update. Nucleic Acids Res 43:D670–D681. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1177 · DOI
  124. Rosenzweig B, Liao LW, Hirsh D (1983) Sequence of the C. elegans transposable element Tc1. Nucleic Acids Res 11(12):4201–4209. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/11.12.4201 · DOI
  125. Rosic S, Kohler F, Erhardt S (2014) Repetitive centromeric satellite RNA is essential for kinetochore formation and cell division. J Cell Biol 207:335–349. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201404097 · DOI
  126. Roy-Engel AM et al (2002) Active Alu element “A-tails”: size does matter. Genome Res 12:1333–1344. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.384802 · DOI
  127. Ruiz-Herrera A, Castresana J, Robinson TJ (2006) Is mammalian chromosomal evolution driven by regions of genome fragility? Genome Biol 7:R115 · DOI
  128. Sanseverino W, Hénaff E, Vives C, Pinosio S, Burgos-Paz W, Morgante M, Ramos-Onsins SE, Garcia-Mas J, Casacuberta JM (2015) Transposon insertions, structural variations, and SNPs contribute to the evolution of the melon genome. Mol Biol Evol 32(10):2760–2774. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msv152 · DOI
  129. Satovic E, Vojvoda Zeljko T, Luchetti A, Mantovani B, Plohl M (2016) Adjacent sequences disclose potential for intra-genomic dispersal of satellite DNA repeats and suggest a complex network with transposable elements. BMC Genomics 17:997. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3347-1 · DOI
  130. Sawada I, Willard C, Shen CK, Chapman B, Wilson AC, Schmid CW (1985) Evolution of Alu family repeats since the divergence of human and chimpanzee. J Mol Evol 22:316–322 · DOI
  131. Schneider KL, Xie Z, Wolfgruber TK, Presting GG (2016) Inbreeding drives maize centromere evolution. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 113:E987–E996. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522008113 · DOI
  132. Schueler MG, Higgins AW, Rudd MK, Gustashaw K, Willard HF (2001) Genomic and genetic definition of a functional human centromere. Science 294:109–115 · DOI
  133. Scott KC, Sullivan BA (2014) Neocentromeres: a place for everything and everything in its place. Trends Genet 30:66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2013.11.003 · DOI
  134. Sen SK et al (2006) Human genomic deletions mediated by recombination between Alu elements. Am J Hum Genet 79:41–53. https://doi.org/10.1086/504600 · DOI
  135. Sijen T, Plasterk RH (2003) Transposon silencing in the Caenorhabditis elegans germ line by natural RNAi. Nature 426:310–314. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02107 · DOI
  136. Smit AF, Riggs AD (1996) Tiggers and DNA transposon fossils in the human genome. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 93:1443–1448 · DOI · Paper page
  137. Sotero-Caio CG, Platt RN 2nd, Suh A, Ray DA (2017) Evolution and diversity of transposable elements in vertebrate genomes. Genome Biol Evol 9:161–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evw264 · DOI · Paper page
  138. Subramanian RP, Wildschutte JH, Russo C, Coffin JM (2011) Identification, characterization, and comparative genomic distribution of the HERV-K (HML-2) group of human endogenous retroviruses. Retrovirology 8:90. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4690-8-90 · DOI · Paper page
  139. Sultana T, Zamborlini A, Cristofari G, Lesage P (2017) Integration site selection by retroviruses and transposable elements in eukaryotes. Nat Rev Genet 18:292–308. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2017.7 · DOI · Paper page
  140. Symer DE, Connelly C, Szak ST, Caputo EM, Cost GJ, Parmigiani G, Boeke JD (2002) Human l1 retrotransposition is associated with genetic instability in vivo. Cell 110:327–338 · DOI
  141. Taniguchi-Ikeda M et al (2011) Pathogenic exon-trapping by SVA retrotransposon and rescue in Fukuyama muscular dystrophy. Nature 478:127–131. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10456 · DOI
  142. Ting DT et al (2011) Aberrant overexpression of satellite repeats in pancreatic and other epithelial cancers. Science 331:593–596. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200801 · DOI · Paper page
  143. Tolomeo D et al (2017) Epigenetic origin of evolutionary novel centromeres. Sci Rep 7:41980. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41980 · DOI
  144. Topp CN, Zhong CX, Dawe RK (2004) Centromere-encoded RNAs are integral components of the maize kinetochore. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 101:15986–15991 · DOI
  145. Tsukahara S et al (2012) Centromere-targeted de novo integrations of an LTR retrotransposon of Arabidopsis lyrata. Genes Dev 26:705–713. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.183871.111 · DOI
  146. Ugarkovic D (2005) Functional elements residing within satellite DNAs. EMBO Rep 6:1035–1039. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400558 · DOI
  147. Ullu E, Tschudi C (1984) Alu sequences are processed 7SL RNA genes. Nature 312:171–172 · DOI
  148. Vagin VV, Klenov MS, Kalmykova AI, Stolyarenko AD, Kotelnikov RN, Gvozdev VA (2004) The RNA interference proteins and vasa locus are involved in the silencing of retrotransposons in the female germline of Drosophila melanogaster. RNA Biol 1:54–58 · DOI
  149. Van Valen L (1973) A new evolutionary law evolutionary. Theory 1:1–30
  150. Vogt J et al (2014) SVA retrotransposon insertion-associated deletion represents a novel mutational mechanism underlying large genomic copy number changes with non-recurrent breakpoints. Genome Biol 15:R80. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2014-15-6-r80 · DOI
  151. Wang H, Xing J, Grover D, Hedges DJ, Han K, Walker JA, Batzer MA (2005) SVA elements: a hominid-specific retroposon family. J Mol Biol 354:994–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2005.09.085 · DOI
  152. Wang L, Norris ET, Jordan IK (2017a) Human retrotransposon insertion polymorphisms are associated with health and disease via gene regulatory phenotypes. Front Microbiol 8:1418. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01418 · DOI
  153. Wang L, Rishishwar L, Marino-Ramirez L, Jordan IK (2017b) Human population-specific gene expression and transcriptional network modification with polymorphic transposable elements. Nucleic Acids Res 45:2318–2328. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1286 · DOI
  154. Warburton PE et al (1997) Immunolocalization of CENP-A suggests a distinct nucleosome structure at the inner kinetochore plate of active centromeres. Curr Biol 7:901–904 · DOI
  155. Wolf G, Greenberg D, Macfarlan TS (2015) Spotting the enemy within: targeted silencing of foreign DNA in mammalian genomes by the Kruppel-associated box zinc finger protein family. Mob DNA 6:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13100-015-0050-8 · DOI
  156. Wong LH, Choo KH (2004) Evolutionary dynamics of transposable elements at the centromere. Trends Genet 20:611–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2004.09.011 · DOI
  157. Yamagata K, Yamazaki T, Miki H, Ogonuki N, Inoue K, Ogura A, Baba T (2007) Centromeric DNA hypomethylation as an epigenetic signature discriminates between germ and somatic cell lineages. Dev Biol 312:419–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.09.041 · DOI
  158. Yan H et al (2005) Transcription and histone modifications in the recombination-free region spanning a rice centromere. Plant Cell 17:3227–3238 · DOI
  159. Yoder JA, Walsh CP, Bestor TH (1997) Cytosine methylation and the ecology of intragenomic parasites. Trends Genet 13:335–340 · DOI · Paper page
  160. Zahn J et al (2015) Expansion of a novel endogenous retrovirus throughout the pericentromeres of modern humans. Genome Biol 16:74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0641-1 · DOI
  161. Zedek F, Bures P (2012) Evidence for centromere drive in the holocentric chromosomes of Caenorhabditis. PLoS One 7(1):e30496. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030496 · DOI
  162. Zhang H, Kobli kova A, Wang K, Gong Z, Oliveira L, Torres GA, Wu Y, Zhang W, Novak P, Buell CR, Macas J, Jiang J (2014) Boom-bust turnovers of megabase-sized centromeric DNA in Solanum species: rapid evolution of DNA sequences associated with centromeres. Plant Cell 26(4):1436–1447. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.114.123877 · DOI
  163. Zhang Y, Li S, Abyzov A, Gerstein MB (2017) Landscape and variation of novel retroduplications in 26 human populations. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005567. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005567 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 223

Metadata

Authors
Klein, S. J., & O’Neill, R. J.
ORCID
O’Neill, Rachel J.
Venue
Chromosome Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-01-13
Volume
26
Issue
1-2
Pages
5-23
ISSN
  • 0967-3849
  • 1573-6849
DOI
10.1007/s10577-017-9569-5
PMC
PMC5857280
Cited by
223
References
14
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Directorate for Biological Sciences (1613806)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review