Cited by 1,065

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Role of transposable elements in heterochromatin and epigenetic control

Lippman, Zachary, Gendrel, Anne-Valérie, Black, Michael, Vaughn, Matthew W., Dedhia, Neilay, Richard McCombie, W., Lavine, Kimberly, Mittal, Vivek, May, Bruce, Kasschau, Kristin D., Carrington, James C., Doerge, Rebecca W., Colot, Vincent, Martienssen, Rob·2004·Nature

Abstract

Heterochromatin has been defined as deeply staining chromosomal material that remains condensed in interphase, whereas euchromatin undergoes de-condensation. Heterochromatin is found near centromeres and telomeres, but interstitial sites of heterochromatin (knobs) are common in plant genomes and were first described in maize. These regions are repetitive and late-replicating. In Drosophila, heterochromatin influences gene expression, a heterochromatin phenomenon called position effect variegation. Similarities between position effect variegation in Drosophila and gene silencing in maize mediated by "controlling elements" (that is, transposable elements) led in part to the proposal that heterochromatin is composed of transposable elements, and that such elements scattered throughout the genome might regulate development. Using microarray analysis, we show that heterochromatin in Arabidopsis is determined by transposable elements and related tandem repeats, under the control of the chromatin remodelling ATPase DDM1 (Decrease in DNA Methylation 1). Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) correspond to these sequences, suggesting a role in guiding DDM1. We also show that transposable elements can regulate genes epigenetically, but only when inserted within or very close to them. This probably accounts for the regulation by DDM1 and the DNA methyltransferase MET1 of the euchromatic, imprinted gene FWA, as its promoter is provided by transposable-element-derived tandem repeats that are ass…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature02651

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A number of epigenetic gene silencing mechanisms, such as cytosine methylation, genomic imprinting and heterochromatin, are thought to have evolved as defense mechanisms against transposition.

    “A number of epigenetic gene silencing mechanisms, such as cytosine methylation [52], genomic imprinting [53] and heterochromatin [54] are thought to have evolved as defense mechanisms against transposition.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Heitz, E. Das heterochromatin der Moose. Jehrb. Wiss. Botanik 69, 762–818 (1928)
  2. McClintock, B. Chromosome organization and genic expression. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 16, 13–47 (1951) · DOI
  3. Hennig, W. Heterochromatin. Chromosoma 108, 1–9 (1999) · DOI
  4. Fransz, P., De Jong, J. H., Lysak, M., Castiglione, M. R. & Schubert, I. Interphase chromosomes in Arabidopsis are organized as well defined chromocenters from which euchromatin loops emanate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 14584–14589 (2002) · DOI
  5. CSHL/WUGSC/PEB, Arabidopsis Sequencing Consortium. The complete sequence of a heterochromatic island from a higher eukaryote. Cell 100, 377–386 (2000) · DOI
  6. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408, 796–815 (2000) · DOI · Paper page
  7. Jurka, J. Repbase update: a database and an electronic journal of repetitive elements. Trends Genet. 16, 418–420 (2000) · DOI
  8. Jenuwein, T. & Allis, C. D. Translating the histone code. Science 293, 1074–1080 (2001) · DOI · Paper page
  9. Vermaak, D., Ahmad, K. & Henikoff, S. Maintenance of chromatin states: an open-and-shut case. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15, 266–274 (2003) · DOI
  10. Martienssen, R. A. & Colot, V. DNA methylation and epigenetic inheritance in plants and filamentous fungi. Science 293, 1070–1074 (2001) · DOI
  11. Lippman, Z., May, B., Yordan, C., Singer, T. & Martienssen, R. Distinct mechanisms determine transposon inheritance and methylation via small interfering RNA and histone modification. PLoS Biol. 1, E67 (2003) · DOI · Paper page
  12. Verbsky, M. L. & Richards, E. J. Chromatin remodeling in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4, 494–500 (2001) · DOI
  13. Gendrel, A. V., Lippman, Z., Yordan, C., Colot, V. & Martienssen, R. A. Dependence of heterochromatic histone H3 methylation patterns on the Arabidopsis gene DDM1. Science 297, 1871–1873 (2002) · DOI
  14. Kakutani, T. Epi-alleles in plants: inheritance of epigenetic information over generations. Plant Cell Physiol. 43, 1106–1111 (2002) · DOI
  15. Sijen, T. & Plasterk, R. H. Transposon silencing in the Caenorhabditis elegans germ line by natural RNAi. Nature 426, 310–314 (2003) · DOI
  16. Aravin, A. A. et al. Double-stranded RNA-mediated silencing of genomic tandem repeats and transposable elements in the D. melanogaster germline. Curr. Biol. 11, 1017–1027 (2001) · DOI
  17. Volpe, T. A. et al. Regulation of heterochromatic silencing and histone H3 lysine-9 methylation by RNAi. Science 297, 1833–1837 (2002) · DOI
  18. Martienssen, R. A. Maintenance of heterochromatin by RNA interference of tandem repeats. Nature Genet. 35, 213–214 (2003) · DOI
  19. Barkan, A. & Martienssen, R. A. Inactivation of maize transposon Mu suppresses a mutant phenotype by activating an outward-reading promoter near the end of Mu1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88, 3502–3506 (1991) · DOI
  20. Soppe, W. J. et al. The late flowering phenotype of fwa mutants is caused by gain-of-function epigenetic alleles of a homeodomain gene. Mol. Cell 6, 791–802 (2000) · DOI
  21. Kinoshita, T. et al. One-way control of FWA imprinting in Arabidopsis endosperm by DNA methylation. Science 303, 521–523 (2004) · DOI
  22. Nagaki, K. et al. Sequencing of a rice centromere uncovers active genes. Nature Genet. 36, 138–145 (2004) · DOI
  23. Rabinowicz, P. D. et al. Genes and transposons are differentially methylated in plants, but not in mammals. Genome Res. 13, 2658–2664 (2003) · DOI
  24. Pal-Bhadra, M. et al. Heterochromatic silencing and HP1 localization in Drosophila are dependent on the RNAi machinery. Science 303, 669–672 (2004) · DOI
  25. Schramke, V. & Allshire, R. Hairpin RNAs and retrotransposon LTRs effect RNAi and chromatin-based gene silencing. Science 301, 1069–1074 (2003) · DOI
  26. Verdel, A. et al. RNAi-mediated targeting of heterochromatin by the RITS complex. Science 303, 672–676 (2004) · DOI
  27. Zilberman, D., Cao, X. & Jacobsen, S. E. ARGONAUTE4 control of locus-specific siRNA accumulation and DNA and histone methylation. Science 299, 716–719 (2003) · DOI · Paper page
  28. Seitz, H. et al. Imprinted microRNA genes transcribed antisense to a reciprocally imprinted retrotransposon-like gene. Nature Genet. 34, 261–262 (2003) · DOI
  29. Chan, S. W. et al. RNA silencing genes control de novo DNA methylation. Science 303, 1336 (2004) · DOI
  30. Xie, Z. et al. Genetic and functional diversification of small RNA pathways in plants. PLoS Biol. 2, E104 (2004) · DOI
  31. Craig, B. A., Black, M. A. & Doerge, R. W. Gene expression data: the technology and statistical analysis. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 8, 1–28 (2003) · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lippman, Z., Gendrel, A.-V., Black, M., Vaughn, M. W., Dedhia, N., Richard McCombie, W., Lavine, K., Mittal, V., May, B., Kasschau, K. D., Carrington, J. C., Doerge, R. W., Colot, V., & Martienssen, R.
Venue
Nature
Published
2004-07
Volume
430
Issue
6998
Pages
471-476
ISSN
  • 0028-0836
  • 1476-4687
Cited by
1,065
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review