Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 561

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared climate policy assumptions

Open access
Kriegler, Elmar, Edmonds, Jae, Hallegatte, Stéphane, Ebi, Kristie L., Kram, Tom, Riahi, Keywan, Winkler, Harald, van Vuuren, Detlef P.·2014·Climatic Change

Abstract

The new scenario framework facilitates the coupling of multiple socioeconomic reference pathways with climate model products using the representative concentration pathways. This will allow for improved assessment of climate impacts, adaptation and mitigation. Assumptions about climate policy play a major role in linking socioeconomic futures with forcing and climate outcomes. The paper presents the concept of shared climate policy assumptions as an important element of the new scenario framework. Shared climate policy assumptions capture key policy attributes such as the goals, instruments and obstacles of mitigation and adaptation measures, and introduce an important additional dimension to the scenario matrix architecture. They can be used to improve the comparability of scenarios in the scenario matrix. Shared climate policy assumptions should be designed to be policy relevant, and as a set to be broad enough to allow a comprehensive exploration of the climate change scenario space.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10584-013-0971-5

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Babiker MH, Eckaus RS (2007) Unemployment effects of climate policy. Environ Sci Policy 10(7–8):600–609 · DOI
  2. Blanford G, Kriegler E, Tavoni M (2014) Harmonization vs. Fragmentation: overview of climate policy scenarios in EMF27. Clim Chang. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0951-9 · DOI
  3. Calvin K, Clarke L, Krey V, Blanford G, Jiang K, Kainuma M, Kriegler E, Luderer G, Shukla PR (2012) The role of Asia in mitigating climate change: results from the Asia modeling exercise. Energy Econ 34(Supplement 3):S251–S260 · DOI
  4. Calvin K, Wise M, Kyle P, Patel P, Clarke L, Edmonds J (2014) Trade-offs of different land and bioenergy policies on the path to achieving climate targets. Clim Chang. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0897-y · DOI
  5. Clarke L, Edmonds J, Krey V, Richels R, Rose S, Tavoni M (2009) International climate policy architectures: overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios. Energy Econ 31:S64–S81 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Ebi et al (2014) A new scenario framework for climate change research: background, process, and future directions. Clim Chang. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0912-3 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Guivarch C, Crassous R, Sassi O, Hallegatte S (2011) The costs of climate policies in a second best world with labour market imperfections. Clim Pol 11:768–788 · DOI
  8. Hallegatte S, Przyluski V, Vogt-Schilb A (2011) Building world narratives for climate change impact, adaptation and vulnerability analyses. Nat Clim Chang 1(3):151–155. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1135 · DOI
  9. Knopf B, Luderer G, Edenhofer O (2011) Exploring the feasibility of low stabilization targets. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 2(4):617–626 · DOI
  10. Kriegler E, O’Neill BC, Hallegatte S, Kram T, Lempert R, Moss R, Wilbanks T (2012) The need for and use of socio-economic scenarios for climate change analysis: a new approach based on shared socio-economic pathways. Glob Environ Chang 22:807–822 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Kriegler E et al (2014a) The role of technology for climate stabilization: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies. Clim Chang. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0953-7 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Kriegler E et al (2014b) Making or breaking climate targets: the AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.021 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Linnér BO, Mickwitz P, Román M (2012) Reducing greenhouse gas emissions through development policies: a framework for analysing policy interventions. Clim Dev 4(3):175–186. doi: 10.1080/17565529.2012.698587 · DOI
  14. Luderer G, Bertram C, Calvin K, De Cian E, Kriegler E (2014) Implications of weak near-term climate policies on long-term mitigation pathways. Clim Chang. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0899-9 · DOI
  15. McCollum DL, Krey V, Riahi K (2011) An integrated approach to energy sustainability. Nat Clim Chang 1:428–429 · DOI
  16. Morgan MG, Keith DW (2008) Improving the way we think about projecting future energy use and emissions of carbon dioxide. Clim Chang 90:189–215 · DOI
  17. Moss RH et al (2008) Towards new scenarios for analysis of emissions, climate change, impacts, and response strategies. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, 132 pp
  18. Nakicenovic N et al (2000) IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  19. O’Neill BC et al (2014) A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socio-economic reference pathways. Clim Chang. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Parson EA (2008) Useful global change scenarios: current issues and challenges. Environ Res Lett 3, 045016 · DOI
  21. Tavoni M et al (2014) The distribution of the major economies’ effort in the Durban platform scenarios. Clim Chang Econ 4(4):1340009 · DOI
  22. van Vuuren DP et al (2011) The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Chang 109:5–31 · DOI · Paper page
  23. van Vuuren DP, Riahi K, Moss R, Edmonds J, Thomson A, Nakicenovic N, Kram T, Berkhout F, Swart R, Janetos A, Rose SK, Arnell N (2012) A proposal for a new scenario framework to support research and assessment in different climate research communities. Glob Environ Chang 22:21–35 · DOI · Paper page
  24. van Vuuren DP et al (2014) A new scenario framework for climate change research: scenario matrix architecture. Clim Chang. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0906-1 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Winkler H, Höhne N, Den Elzen M (2008) Methods for quantifying the benefits of sustainable development policies and measures (SD-PAMs). Clim Pol 8(2):119–134 · doi:10.3763/cpol.2007.0433
  26. Winkler H, Vorster S, Marquard A (2009) Who picks up the remainder? Mitigation in developed and developing countries. Clim Pol 9(6):634–651 · doi:10.3763/cpol.2009.0664

Cited by

See all 561

Metadata

Authors
Kriegler, E., Edmonds, J., Hallegatte, S., Ebi, K. L., Kram, T., Riahi, K., Winkler, H., & van Vuuren, D. P.
Venue
Climatic Change
Published
2014-01-28
Volume
122
Issue
3
Pages
401-414
ISSN
  • 0165-0009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1480
OpenAlex
W1963951747
Cited by
561
References
2
FWCI
46.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared climate policy assumptions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10584-013-0971-5
The paper
Kriegler, E., Edmonds, J., Hallegatte, S., Ebi, K. L., Kram, T., Riahi, K., Winkler, H., & van Vuuren, D. P. (2014). A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared climate policy assumptions. Climatic Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0971-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.