Cited by 93Eating Disorders and BehaviorsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

The Role of Anxiety Sensitivity in Eating Pathology

Anestis, Michael D., Holm-Denoma, Jill M., Gordon, Kathryn H., Schmidt, Norman B., Joiner, Thomas E.·2008·Cognitive Therapy and Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10608-006-9085-y

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anxiety sensitivity is cross-sectionally associated with eating disorder symptoms, including bulimia symptoms, in undergraduates, adult mental health outpatients, and adolescents and adults receiving residential eating disorder treatment.

    “Recent work links ED pathology and AS cross-sectionally. Among undergraduates, AS is associated with ED symptoms (Fulton et al., 2012) and bulimia symptoms specifically (Anestis et al., 2008). It is also associated with bulimia symptoms and drive for thinness in adult mental health outpatients (Anestis et al., 2008), and with ED symptoms in adolescents and adults receiving residential ED treatment”
  • The relationship between anxiety sensitivity and eating disorder symptoms is mediated by experiential avoidance or by interoceptive awareness.

    “In these studies, the relationship between AS and ED symptoms was mediated by experiential avoidance (the tendency to avoid situations causing discomfort; Espel-Huynh et al., 2019; Fulton et al., 2012), or by interoceptive awareness, (the general sense of the body’s sensations; Anestis et al., 2008).”
  • Individuals scoring high on anxiety sensitivity exhibit an increased prevalence of eating disorder symptoms on the EDI.

    “Individuals scoring high on anxiety sensitivity exhibit an increased prevalence of eating disorder symptoms when assessed using the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI) [15].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anestis, M. D., Holm-Denoma, J. M., Gordon, K. H., Schmidt, N. B., & Joiner, T. E.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Joiner, Thomas E.
Venue
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2007-02-15
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
370-385
ISSN
  • 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2819
OpenAlex
W2046345008
Cited by
93
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
anxiety sensitivity, eating pathology, eating disorder symptoms, bulimia nervosa, drive for thinness, interoceptive awareness, Eating Disorder Inventory, anxiety regulation, eating disorder risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review