Cited by 167Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesBehavioral Health and InterventionsPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Anxiety sensitivity and working memory capacity: Risk factors and targets for health behavior promotion

Open access
Otto, Michael W., Eastman, Abraham, Lo, Stephen, Hearon, Bridget A., Bickel, Warren K., Zvolensky, Michael, Smits, Jasper A.J., Doan, Stacey N.·2016·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

Understanding the nature and influence of specific risk profiles is increasingly important for health behavior promotion. The purpose of this article is to document the value of two factors-anxiety sensitivity (AS) and working memory capacity (WMC)-for enhancing risk for the initiation and/or maintenance of a range of negative health behaviors. AS is a distress-related risk factor that potentiates avoidance/coping motivations for negative health behaviors. Stress provides the conditions for negative somatic and affective states, and AS amplifies the aversiveness of these experiences and correspondingly hinders adaptive functioning. In contrast, low WMC is hypothesized to exert its effect by decreasing the capacity to filter out current temptations, attenuating a focus on longer-term goals and impairing the application of relevant coping skills at times of stress. In this review, we provide conceptual models for the separate roles of high AS and low WMC in negative health behaviors, review the influence of these factors on specific health behavior exemplars (eating behaviors/obesity, physical activity, smoking, alcohol use, and sleep promotion), provide preliminary evidence for their value as independent treatment targets for health-behavior promotion, and encourage specific research directions in relation to these variables.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.07.003

Cites

175 of 175 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Otto, M. W., Eastman, A., Lo, S., Hearon, B. A., Bickel, W. K., Zvolensky, M., Smits, J. A. J., & Doan, S. N.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Albright College (US)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Claremont McKenna College (US)
Corresponding author
Otto, Michael W.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
49
Pages
67-78
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2497708923
Cited by
136
References
175
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 7
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Scholarship - Claremont (Claremont Colleges) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
anxiety sensitivity, working memory capacity, health behavior promotion, risk factors, stress, coping, dietary habits, obesity, physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, sleep promotion, treatment goals
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Health Promotion, Humans, Memory, Short-Term, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review