The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
To resist it or to embrace it? Examining ChatGPT’s potential to support teacher feedback in EFL writing
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The second is the displacement of teacher expertise, and thus the suggestion in literature is for complementary configurations where AI is used to complement rather than replace teacher feedback [17].”
In the citing paper
“First, with the aid of this technology, students may be able to complete tasks for which they lack the necessary skills, such as creating photographs and getting some ideas from other disciplines (Guo & Wang, 2023).”
From A Scoping Review on How Generative Artificial Intelligence Transforms Assessment in Higher Education (2024) · cites this paper as Guo & Wang, 2023
In the citing paper
“AI has the potential to lessen individual biases in grading procedures, including essays, project proposals, and theses (Guo & Wang, 2023).”
From A Scoping Review on How Generative Artificial Intelligence Transforms Assessment in Higher Education (2024) · cites this paper as Guo & Wang, 2023
In the citing paper
“Various assignment types, including essays and computer coding, are impacted differently by GenAI (Fergus et al., 2023; Greiner et al., 2023; Guo & Wang, 2023; Naidu & Sevnarayan, 2023; Ouh et al., 2023; Smolansky et al., 2023).”
From A Scoping Review on How Generative Artificial Intelligence Transforms Assessment in Higher Education (2024) · cites this paper as Guo & Wang, 2023
In the citing paper
“This finding can be attributed to the specific and actionable nature of AI-generated feedback, which often focused on surface-level issues such as grammar, spelling, and vocabulary.”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo & Wang, 2024
In the citing paper
“In contrast, teacher-generated feedback is typically concise, formative, and context-sensitive, focusing on critical areas for improvement in a more targeted manner.”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo and Wang (2024)
In the citing paper
“Research by Guo and Wang (2024) and Yoon et al. (2023) highlights that AI-generated feedback tends to be lengthier and more overwhelming, often containing redundant or overly generic suggestions.”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo and Wang (2024)
In the citing paper
“In contrast, teacher-generated feedback tended to focus selectively on content-specific and language-specific aspects, with a preference for indirect feedback types, such as 'informative' or 'querying' remarks.”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo and Wang (2024)
In the citing paper
“Their findings revealed that while AI-generated feedback was greater in volume and primarily direct, it was evenly distributed across content, language, and organizational issues.”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo and Wang (2024)
In the citing paper
“In contrast, AI-generated feedback demonstrates a more consistent distribution across local and global issues (Guo & Wang, 2024) as well as a high agreement with instructors (Dai et al., 2023)”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo & Wang, 2024
In the citing paper
“In contrast, teacher-generated feedback offers more contextualized, selective insights tailored to both content-specific and language-specific aspects of students' work (Guo & Wang, 2024; Yoon et al., 2023).”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo & Wang, 2024
In the citing paper
“According to the literature, AI-generated feedback provides a greater volume of direct, concise, and formative suggestions, often focused on surface-level issues like grammar and vocabulary.”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo & Wang, 2024
In the citing paper
“The slight advantage of the AIGFTGF order can be attributed to the nature of AI-generated feedback, which is particularly effective at addressing surface-level issues, such as grammar, vocabulary, and basic organization (Guo & Wang, 2024; Lin & Crosthwaite, 2024; Yoon et al., 2023).”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo & Wang, 2024
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback
Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C. L., Mishkin, P., Zhang, C., Agarwal, S., Slama, K., Ray, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.02155 · Cited by 4,208
Kung, T. H., Cheatham, M., Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., De Leon, L., Elepaño, C., Madriaga, M., Aggabao, R., Diaz-Candido, G., Maningo, J., et al. (2023) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198 · Cited by 4,115
ChatGPT: five priorities for research
van Dis, E. A. M., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7 · Cited by 1,842 · cited 1×
“…human-like responses to users’ prompts in a conversational manner, acting as a chatbot, and has become a versatile tool with a range of applications, such as composing poetry, commenting on news, debugging code, writing essays, and summarising literature (Taecharungroj, 2023; van Dis et al., 2023).”
ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?
(2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9 · Cited by 1,806 · cited 2×
“In the realm of education, researchers have been discussing ChatGPT’s implications for teaching and learning (Garcia-Peñalvo, 2023; Rudolph et al., 2023; Zhai, 2022) and exploring its potential use in various subjects, such as journalism and media (Pavlik, 2023), medicine (Gilson et al., 2022; Khan…”
Pavlik, J. V. (2023) · Journalism & Mass Communication Educator · doi:10.1177/10776958221149577 · Cited by 972 · cited 1×
“…ChatGPT’s implications for teaching and learning (Garcia-Peñalvo, 2023; Rudolph et al., 2023; Zhai, 2022) and exploring its potential use in various subjects, such as journalism and media (Pavlik, 2023), medicine (Gilson et al., 2022; Khan et al., 2023), and engineering education (Qadir, 2022).”
Prompt Programming for Large Language Models: Beyond the Few-Shot Paradigm
Reynolds, L., & McDonell, K. (2021) · Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411763.3451760 · Cited by 952 · cited 1×
“In the future, researchers may pay attention to the importance of prompt programming (Reynolds & McDonell, 2021) and attempt diverse inputs and compare their output results to identify effective ways to use ChatGPT for performing the desired task of feedback generation.”
ChatGPT User Experience: Implications for Education
Zhai, X. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4312418 · Cited by 935 · cited 1×
“…realm of education, researchers have been discussing ChatGPT’s implications for teaching and learning (Garcia-Peñalvo, 2023; Rudolph et al., 2023; Zhai, 2022) and exploring its potential use in various subjects, such as journalism and media (Pavlik, 2023), medicine (Gilson et al., 2022; Khan et…”
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Radford, A., Wu, J., Child, R., Luan, D., Amodei, D., Sutskever, I., et al. (2019). Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog, 1(8), 9. Retrieved 15 January 2023 from https://life-extension.github.io/2020/05/27/GPT%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%88%9D%E6%8E%A2/language-models.pdf
- Stiennon, N., Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Ziegler, D. M., Lowe, R., Voss, C., Radford, A., Amodei, D., & Christiano, P. (2020). Learning to summarize from human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.01325. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Scoping Review on How Generative Artificial Intelligence Transforms Assessment in Higher Education
Xia, Q., Weng, X., Ouyang, F., Lin, T. J., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00468-z · Cited by 493
Karataş, F., Abedi, F. Y., Ozek Gunyel, F., Karadeniz, D., & Kuzgun, Y. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12574-6 · Cited by 252
The use of ChatGPT in teaching and learning: a systematic review through SWOT analysis approach
Mai, D. T. T., da, C. A. N., & Hanh, N. V. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1328769 · Cited by 363
Koltovskaia, S., Rahmati, P., & Saeli, H. (2024) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101130 · Cited by 241
Teng, M. F. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100270 · Cited by 182
Guo, K., Pan, M., Li, Y., & Lai, C. (2024) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100962 · Cited by 173
Self-citationChatGPT for L2 learning: Current status and implications
Yang, L., & Li, R. (2024) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103351 · Cited by 213
Generative AI chatbots in higher education: a review of an emerging research area
McGrath, C., Farazouli, A., & Pargman, T. C. (2024) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-024-01288-w · Cited by 254
Lo, C. K., Yu, P. L. H., Xu, S., Ng, D. T. K., & Jong, M. S. (2024) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00342-5 · Cited by 342
Boudouaia, A., Mouas, S., & Kouider, B. (2024) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331241247465 · Cited by 186
Nedungadi, P., Tang, K., & Raghu Raman, R. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16229779 · Cited by 169
Li, B., Lowell, V. L., Wang, C., & Li, X. (2024) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100266 · Cited by 218
Ding, L., & Zou, D. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12402-3 · Cited by 122
Exploring ChatGPT-supported teacher feedback in the EFL context
Han, J., & Li, M. (2024) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103502 · Cited by 116
Du, J., & Alm, A. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14070726 · Cited by 115
Bui, N. M., & Barrot, J. S. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12891-w · Cited by 113
Shi, H., Chai, C. S., Zhou, S., & Aubrey, S. (2026) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2025.2454541 · Cited by 109
Wang, Q., Gao, Y., & Wang, X. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2400403 · Cited by 117
Guo, K., & Li, D. (2024) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103362 · Cited by 140
Self-citationChatGPT adoption and its influence on faculty well-being: an empirical research in higher education
Cambra-Fierro, J. J., Blasco, M. F., López-Pérez, M.-E. E., & Trifu, A. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12871-0 · Cited by 97
Nikolic, S., Wentworth, I., Sheridan, L., Moss, S., Duursma, E., Jones, R. A., Ros, M., & Middleton, R. (2024) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.9643 · Cited by 102
“Most of these studies revealed somewhat or largely favourable attitudes towards the adoption of AI or GenAI in teaching (e.g., Alnasib, 2023; Barrett & Pack, 2023; Firat, 2023; Guo & Wang, 2023; Kiryakova & Angelova, 2023; Livberber & Ayvaz.”
Large Language Models in Cybersecurity: State-of-the-Art
Motlagh, F. N., Hajizadeh, M., Majd, M., Najafi, P., Cheng, F., & Meinel, C. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.00891 · Cited by 92
“In education, LLMs support educators in various tasks such as assignment assessment [36], question generation [22], providing feedback [30], and essay grading [92].”
BackgroundKohnke, L. (2024) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100279 · Cited by 132
Li, B., Tan, Y. L., Wang, C., & Lowell, V. L. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100445 · Cited by 217
Teng, M. F. (2024) · International Journal of TESOL Studies · doi:10.58304/ijts.20240304 · Cited by 191
The grass is not always greener: Teacher vs. GPT-assisted written corrective feedback
Lin, S., & Crosthwaite, P. (2024) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103529 · Cited by 86
ChatGPT as a Language Learning Tool: An Emerging Technology Report
Barrot, J. S. (2023) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-023-09711-4 · Cited by 130
Teng, M. F. (2024) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12811 · Cited by 118
Zou, S., Guo, K., Wang, J., & Liu, Y. (2026) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2024.2447279 · Cited by 79
Self-citationSysoyev, P. V. (2024) · Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia · doi:10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-2-31-53 · Cited by 77
Automated Essay Scoring and Revising Based on Open-Source Large Language Models
Song, Y., Zhu, Q., Wang, H., & Zheng, Q. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2024.3396873 · Cited by 89
Nguyen, H. M., & Goto, D. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12495-4 · Cited by 102
Seo, K., Yoo, M., Dodson, S., & Jin, S.-H. (2024) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2024.2330525 · Cited by 106
Xu, T., Liu, Y., Jin, Y., Qu, Y.-Y., Bai, J., Zhang, W., & Zhou, Y. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13530 · Cited by 113
The impact of integrating ChatGPT with teachers’ feedback on EFL writing skills
Asadi, M., Ebadi, S., & Mohammadi, L. (2025) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101766 · Cited by 125
Guo, K., Zhang, E. D., Li, D., & Yu, S. (2025) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13540 · Cited by 69
Self-citationA scoping review of empirical studies on generative artificial intelligence in language education
Wang, Y., Zhang, T., Yao, L., & Seedhouse, P. (2025) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2025.2509759 · Cited by 122
Tran, T. T. T. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15020232 · Cited by 68
Exploratory study on the potential of ChatGPT as a rater of second language writing
Shin, D., & Lee, J. H. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12817-6 · Cited by 81
Effects of adaptive feedback generated by a large language model: A case study in teacher education
Kinder, A., Briese, F. J., Jacobs, M., Dern, N., Glodny, N., Jacobs, S., & Leßmann, S. (2024) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100349 · Cited by 93
Alsofyani, A. H., & Barzanji, A. M. (2024) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331241307297 · Cited by 108
Yeung, S. (2025) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101203 · Cited by 70
Large Language Models in Education: A Systematic Review
Dong, B., Bai, J., Xu, T., & Zhou, Y. (2024) · International Conference on Computer Science and Technologies in Education (CSTE) · doi:10.1109/cste62025.2024.00031 · Cited by 82
Generative AI and Second Language Writing
Li, S. (2025) · Digital studies in language and literature · doi:10.1515/dsll-2025-0007 · Cited by 75
Ma, M. (2024) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.12603 · Cited by 60
The effects of generative AI usage in EFL classrooms on the l2 motivational self system
Huang, J., & Mizumoto, A. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13071-6 · Cited by 73
Li, J., Huang, J., Wu, W., & Whipple, P. B. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03755-2 · Cited by 104
Incorporating ChatGPT for EFL Writing and Its Effects on Writing Engagement
Teng, M. F., & Huang, J. (2025) · International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.4018/ijcallt.367874 · Cited by 53
Wang, C., Li, X., & Zou, B. (2025) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70054 · Cited by 58
Generative AI and L2 Written Feedback Studies: A Scoping Review
Crosthwaite, P., & Sun, S. (2026) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/00336882251386530 · Cited by 50
A systematic review of AI-based feedback in educational settings
Durak, H. Y., & Onan, A. (2025) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-025-00428-1 · Cited by 78
Xu, S., Su, Y., & Liu, K. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13457-0 · Cited by 98
Zhou, W., & Kim, Y. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12705-z · Cited by 68
Wu, H., Liu, W., & Zeng, Y. (2024) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104376 · Cited by 54
Zou, B., Wang, C., He, H., Li, C., Purwanto, E., & Wang, P. (2025) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102158 · Cited by 46
Xiao, F., Zhu, S., & (辛闻), W. X. (2025) · ECNU Review of Education · doi:10.1177/20965311241310881 · Cited by 95
Generative AI (GenAI) and pre-service teacher agency in ELT
Lee, S., Jeon, J., & Choe, H. (2025) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/ccaf005 · Cited by 63
Sysoyev, P. V., & Filatov, E. M. (2024) · Perspectives of science and education · doi:10.32744/pse.2024.1.6 · Cited by 47
Evaluating large language models for criterion-based grading from agreement to consistency
Zhang, D., Boey, M., Tan, Y. Y., & Jia, A. H. S. (2024) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-024-00291-1 · Cited by 47
Yao, Y., Zhu, X., Xiao, L., & Lu, Q. (2025) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101179 · Cited by 38
Xueying, X. U., Sun, F., & Hu, W. W. (2025) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2025.103600 · Cited by 44
Ji, Y., Zhan, Z., Li, T., Zou, X., & Lyu, S. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2025.3554584 · Cited by 42
Zhou, G. (2025) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70076 · Cited by 35
Kwok, H. L., Shi, Y., Han, X., Li, D., & Liu, K. (2025) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2025.103618 · Cited by 47
Kaliisa, R., Misiejuk, K., López‐Pernas, S., & Saqr, M. (2025) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2025.2553639 · Cited by 57
Understanding EFL student writers’ metacognitive awareness in utilizing ChatGPT
Teng, M. F. (2025) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2025.103848 · Cited by 49
Artificial intelligence as an automated essay scoring tool: A focus on ChatGPT
Uyar, A. C., & Büyükahıska, D. (2025) · International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education · doi:10.21449/ijate.1517994 · Cited by 44
A Study on the Efficacy of ChatGPT-4 in Enhancing Students’ English Communication Skills
Wang, Y. (2025) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440241310644 · Cited by 89
Xu, L., Zhang, L., Ling, O., & Wang, D. (2025) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101227 · Cited by 32
Self-citationA Collaborative Model for Integrating Teacher and GenAI into Future Education
Memon, T. D., & Kwan, P. (2025) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-025-01105-w · Cited by 56
Li, K., Wang, P., & Chen, G. (2025) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2025.105219 · Cited by 50
Farrokhnia, M., Latifi, S., Papadopoulos, P. M., Hogenkamp, L., Gijlers, H., Khosravi, H., & Noroozi, O. (2026) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-026-00579-9 · Cited by 48
Huang, X., Xu, W., Li, F., & Yu, Z. (2024) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-024-00865-y · Cited by 30
The value of GenAI for peer feedback provision: student perceptions and impacts
Noroozi, O., Haddadian, G., Gao, X., Schunn, C. D., Alqassab, M., & Banihashem, S. K. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00558-6 · Cited by 31
Artificial Intelligence Use in Feedback: A Qualitative Analysis
Pang, T. Y., Kootsookos, A., & Cheng, C. (2024) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/40wmcj98 · Cited by 46
Yeung, R. S. K., Tian, R., Chiu, D. K. W., & Choi, S. P. M. (2025) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103082 · Cited by 45
A matrix of artificial intelligence tools in pre-service foreign language teacher training
Sysoyev, P. V., Filatov, E. M., Evstigneev, M. N., Polyakov, O. G., Алексеевна, Е. И., & Олегович, С. Д. (2024) · Вестник Тамбовского университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки · doi:10.20310/1810-0201-2024-29-3-559-588 · Cited by 28
Pawlak, M., Kruk, M., Shirvan, M. E., Taherian, T., & Karimpour, S. (2025) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2025.2498094 · Cited by 29
Ding, L., Zou, D., & Kohnke, L. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13775-3 · Cited by 59
Generative AI in Technical Communication: A Review of Research from 2023 to 2024
Reeves, C. A., & Sylvia, J. J. (2024) · Journal of Technical Writing and Communication · doi:10.1177/00472816241260043 · Cited by 33
AI-supported L2 vocabulary acquisition–a systematic review from 2015 to 2023
Yang, Y. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13417-8 · Cited by 42
Wu, H., Wang, Y., & Lalli, G. S. (2025) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2024-0301 · Cited by 29
Wang, C., Wang, Y., & Zou, B. (2024) · Journal of Language Teaching · doi:10.54475/jlt.2024.004 · Cited by 25
Artificial intelligence in applied (linguistics): a content analysis and future prospects
Alaqlobi, O., Alduais, A. M. S., Qasem, F. A. A., & Alasmari, M. (2024) · Cogent Arts and Humanities · doi:10.1080/23311983.2024.2382422 · Cited by 50
Has artificial intelligence rendered language teaching obsolete?
Handley, Z. L. (2024) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12929 · Cited by 35
Leveraging ChatGPT for Second Language Writing Feedback and Assessment
Li, M. (2024) · International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.4018/ijcallt.360382 · Cited by 40
Language teacher AI literacy: insights from collaborations with ChatGPT
Liu, W. (2025) · Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1515/jccall-2024-0030 · Cited by 38
ChatGPT and EFL/ESL writing: a systematic review of advantages and challenges
Alsaedi, N. (2024) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v17n5p41 · Cited by 22
“Yan (2023) Guo & Wang (2023) Regarding the provided feedback, it has been found that even though ChatGPT provides beneficial feedback, it is not without limitations.”
BackgroundInfluentialLuo, S., & Zou, D. (2024) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102057 · Cited by 22
Zou, M., Soyoof, A., Teng, M. F., & Chen, H. (2025) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688251375547 · Cited by 29
Liu, Z., & Zhang, W. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-65226-7 · Cited by 31
Obaidoon, S., & Wei, H. (2024) · Future in Educational Research · doi:10.1002/fer3.39 · Cited by 25
COGNITIVE-MATRIX ANALYSIS AS A TOOL FOR EXPLORING CULTURAL IDENTITY OF A FICTION AUTHOR
Sysoyev, P. V., & Filatov, E. M. (2024) · Moscow University Bulletin Series 19 Linguistics and Intercultural Communication · doi:10.55959/msu-2074-1588-19-27-2-3 · Cited by 25
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Instructional System Design
Chai, D. S., Kim, H. S., Kim, K. N., Ha, Y., Shin, S. S. H., & Yoon, S. W. (2025) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/15344843251320256 · Cited by 20
Kim, M., & Chon, Y. V. (2025) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2025.100950 · Cited by 25
Lu, D., & Zeng, Y. (2025) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2025.2525341 · Cited by 28
Lu, Q., Yao, Y., Xiao, L., Zhu, X., & Yin, H. (2026) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2025.2605541 · Cited by 32
Cengiz, B. C., Bilki, Z., Ataş, A. H., & Çelik, B. (2025) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2025.103837 · Cited by 36
Xu, T., & Jumaat, N. F. (2024) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v18i15.49219 · Cited by 19
Cao, Y. Y., Gao, X., Yin, H., Yu, K., & Zhou, D. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su162411135 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Guo, K., & Wang, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Deliang
- Venue
- Education and Information Technologies
- Published
- 2023-08-29
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 8435-8463
- ISSN
- 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7608
- OpenAlex
- W4386253646
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 191 · 2025: 166 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 503.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › English Language Learning and Teaching
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, large language models, teacher feedback, EFL writing, argumentative writing, automated feedback, teacher perceptions, Chinese undergraduates, writing development, teacher-AI collaboration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
