The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
To resist it or to embrace it? Examining ChatGPT’s potential to support teacher feedback in EFL writing
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The second is the displacement of teacher expertise, and thus the suggestion in literature is for complementary configurations where AI is used to complement rather than replace teacher feedback [17].”
In the citing paper
“First, with the aid of this technology, students may be able to complete tasks for which they lack the necessary skills, such as creating photographs and getting some ideas from other disciplines (Guo & Wang, 2023).”
From A Scoping Review on How Generative Artificial Intelligence Transforms Assessment in Higher Education (2024) · cites this paper as Guo & Wang, 2023
In the citing paper
“AI has the potential to lessen individual biases in grading procedures, including essays, project proposals, and theses (Guo & Wang, 2023).”
From A Scoping Review on How Generative Artificial Intelligence Transforms Assessment in Higher Education (2024) · cites this paper as Guo & Wang, 2023
In the citing paper
“Various assignment types, including essays and computer coding, are impacted differently by GenAI (Fergus et al., 2023; Greiner et al., 2023; Guo & Wang, 2023; Naidu & Sevnarayan, 2023; Ouh et al., 2023; Smolansky et al., 2023).”
From A Scoping Review on How Generative Artificial Intelligence Transforms Assessment in Higher Education (2024) · cites this paper as Guo & Wang, 2023
In the citing paper
“This finding can be attributed to the specific and actionable nature of AI-generated feedback, which often focused on surface-level issues such as grammar, spelling, and vocabulary.”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo & Wang, 2024
In the citing paper
“In contrast, teacher-generated feedback is typically concise, formative, and context-sensitive, focusing on critical areas for improvement in a more targeted manner.”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo and Wang (2024)
In the citing paper
“Research by Guo and Wang (2024) and Yoon et al. (2023) highlights that AI-generated feedback tends to be lengthier and more overwhelming, often containing redundant or overly generic suggestions.”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo and Wang (2024)
In the citing paper
“In contrast, teacher-generated feedback tended to focus selectively on content-specific and language-specific aspects, with a preference for indirect feedback types, such as 'informative' or 'querying' remarks.”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo and Wang (2024)
In the citing paper
“Their findings revealed that while AI-generated feedback was greater in volume and primarily direct, it was evenly distributed across content, language, and organizational issues.”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo and Wang (2024)
In the citing paper
“In contrast, AI-generated feedback demonstrates a more consistent distribution across local and global issues (Guo & Wang, 2024) as well as a high agreement with instructors (Dai et al., 2023)”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo & Wang, 2024
In the citing paper
“In contrast, teacher-generated feedback offers more contextualized, selective insights tailored to both content-specific and language-specific aspects of students' work (Guo & Wang, 2024; Yoon et al., 2023).”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo & Wang, 2024
In the citing paper
“According to the literature, AI-generated feedback provides a greater volume of direct, concise, and formative suggestions, often focused on surface-level issues like grammar and vocabulary.”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo & Wang, 2024
In the citing paper
“The slight advantage of the AIGFTGF order can be attributed to the nature of AI-generated feedback, which is particularly effective at addressing surface-level issues, such as grammar, vocabulary, and basic organization (Guo & Wang, 2024; Lin & Crosthwaite, 2024; Yoon et al., 2023).”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo & Wang, 2024
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback
Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C. L., Mishkin, P., Zhang, C., Agarwal, S., Slama, K., Ray, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.02155 · Cited by 4,208
Kung, T. H., Cheatham, M., Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., De Leon, L., Elepaño, C., Madriaga, M., Aggabao, R., Diaz-Candido, G., Maningo, J., et al. (2023) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198 · Cited by 4,115
ChatGPT: five priorities for research
van Dis, E. A. M., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7 · Cited by 1,842 · cited 1×
“…human-like responses to users’ prompts in a conversational manner, acting as a chatbot, and has become a versatile tool with a range of applications, such as composing poetry, commenting on news, debugging code, writing essays, and summarising literature (Taecharungroj, 2023; van Dis et al., 2023).”
ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?
(2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9 · Cited by 1,806 · cited 2×
“In the realm of education, researchers have been discussing ChatGPT’s implications for teaching and learning (Garcia-Peñalvo, 2023; Rudolph et al., 2023; Zhai, 2022) and exploring its potential use in various subjects, such as journalism and media (Pavlik, 2023), medicine (Gilson et al., 2022; Khan…”
Pavlik, J. V. (2023) · Journalism & Mass Communication Educator · doi:10.1177/10776958221149577 · Cited by 972 · cited 1×
“…ChatGPT’s implications for teaching and learning (Garcia-Peñalvo, 2023; Rudolph et al., 2023; Zhai, 2022) and exploring its potential use in various subjects, such as journalism and media (Pavlik, 2023), medicine (Gilson et al., 2022; Khan et al., 2023), and engineering education (Qadir, 2022).”
Prompt Programming for Large Language Models: Beyond the Few-Shot Paradigm
Reynolds, L., & McDonell, K. (2021) · Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411763.3451760 · Cited by 952 · cited 1×
“In the future, researchers may pay attention to the importance of prompt programming (Reynolds & McDonell, 2021) and attempt diverse inputs and compare their output results to identify effective ways to use ChatGPT for performing the desired task of feedback generation.”
ChatGPT User Experience: Implications for Education
Zhai, X. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4312418 · Cited by 935 · cited 1×
“…realm of education, researchers have been discussing ChatGPT’s implications for teaching and learning (Garcia-Peñalvo, 2023; Rudolph et al., 2023; Zhai, 2022) and exploring its potential use in various subjects, such as journalism and media (Pavlik, 2023), medicine (Gilson et al., 2022; Khan et…”
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Radford, A., Wu, J., Child, R., Luan, D., Amodei, D., Sutskever, I., et al. (2019). Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog, 1(8), 9. Retrieved 15 January 2023 from https://life-extension.github.io/2020/05/27/GPT%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%88%9D%E6%8E%A2/language-models.pdf
- Stiennon, N., Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Ziegler, D. M., Lowe, R., Voss, C., Radford, A., Amodei, D., & Christiano, P. (2020). Learning to summarize from human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.01325. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 451
Empirical validation of a generative AI framework for personalized education assessment
Qian, M., Ji, H., & Li, L. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-42169-9 · Cited by 6
The Dimensions of Abundance in AI-Generated Feedback
Lindsay, E. D., Rodda, A. E., Lindqvist, A. L., Quince, Z., Lim, M., & Jiang, D. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16030465 · Cited by 3
A systematic review of language educators’ practices and development with GenAI
Li, B., Exter, M., Feng, W., Tang, G., & Xu, K. (2026) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijaied.2026.100010 · Cited by 6
Fan, L., Xiong, L., Xiao, W., & Cheung, A. K. F. (2026) · The Interpreter and Translator Trainer · doi:10.1080/1750399x.2026.2657807 · Cited by 3
Mendoza, N. B., Xiong, Y., & Yan, Z. (2026) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2026.2641521 · Cited by 6
Teachers’ Busywork, Moral Entanglement, and the Automation of Responsibility
Wieczorek, M., & Tollon, F. (2026) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-026-10557-9 · Cited by 3
Mapping the landscape of AI-driven feedback in education: a scoping review
Lipnevich, A. A., Taranto, C. A., DeLuca, C., Nukpetsi, E., Rickey, N., Hopfenbeck, T. N., Carter, E., & McGrane, J. A. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1799346 · Cited by 5
Zhang, J., Zhang, L. J., & Wang, X. (2026) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03055698.2026.2698519 · Cited by 4
Scientific Mapping of GenAI in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Context
Luo, Q., & Chen, F. (2025) · International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction · doi:10.4018/ijthi.384377 · Cited by 9
Oliński, M., & Sieciński, K. (2025) · Youth · doi:10.3390/youth5040106 · Cited by 4
Caneva, C. (2025) · Médiations et médiatisations · doi:10.52358/mm.vi22.495 · Cited by 3
Su, Y. (2024) · Journal of Electrical Systems · doi:10.52783/jes.3904 · Cited by 5
Kılıç, E., & Çelik, H. E. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100452 · Cited by 9
Chen, S., & Lou, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1727544 · Cited by 2
Хаустов, О. Н., Tormyshova, T. Y., & Sukhanova, N. I. (2024) · Вестник Тамбовского университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки · doi:10.20310/1810-0201-2024-29-5-1194-1207 · Cited by 4
ChatGPT: Is It Reliable as an Automated Writing Evaluation Tool?
Toscu, S. (2025) · Anadolu Journal Of Educational Sciences International · doi:10.18039/ajesi.1463503 · Cited by 4
Foreign Language Learners' Perceptions of Chatbot-Assisted Speech-Giving Tasks
Huang, S. R., & Wang, W. (2025) · International Conference on Educational and Information Technology · doi:10.1109/iceit64364.2025.10975878 · Cited by 2
An Analysis of ChatGPT-Generated Feedback on Argumentative Essays in Korean EFL Classrooms
Oh, H., & Hsieh, S.-F. (2025) · Modern English Education · doi:10.18095/meeso.2025.26.1.166 · Cited by 3
Tribes, M., & Blanco, O. M. (2025) · Journal of Spanish Language Teaching · doi:10.1080/23247797.2025.2504266 · Cited by 2
Baydikova, T. V., & Solomatina, A. G. (2025) · Вестник Тамбовского университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки · doi:10.20310/1810-0201-2025-30-3-648-659 · Cited by 2
Chen, Z., Wei, W., Cao, Y. K., & To, J. (2025) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2025.2553208 · Cited by 3
Валерьевна, Т. Ю., & Makarowa, E. L. (2025) · Вестник Тамбовского университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки · doi:10.20310/1810-0201-2025-30-4-814-827 · Cited by 2
Григорьева, Е. Н., Абрамова, А. Г., & Юрьевна, Г. Т. (2025) · Bulletin of the Chuvash State Pedagogical University named after I Y Yakovlev · doi:10.37972/chgpu.2025.128.3.014 · Cited by 2
Developing Successful Intelligence in Global Academia: A Triarchic Framework for EAP Pedagogy
Yu, Y., Xu, Y., & Wu, Y. (2025) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence13110134 · Cited by 5
El impacto de la IA generativa en la labor docente de estudiantes de bachillerato
Solis-Aviles, E. J., Bravo-Briones, D. B., Solis-Aviles, J. Y., Medina, E. J. M., & Moya-Muñoz, L. D. (2025) · Revista Científica Ciencia y Método · doi:10.55813/gaea/rcym/v3/n4/108 · Cited by 5
Redefining Education in the Digital Age: The Role of GPT Models in Academic Fraud and Logistics
Sangka, K. B., Pratama, R. D., & Hidayat, R. W. (2025) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/hbe2/7118205 · Cited by 3
Yazma becerisini yapay zekâ odağında yeniden düşünmek: İmkân ve ihtimaller
Atasoy, A. (2025) · Alanyazın · doi:10.59320/alanyazin.1781293 · Cited by 2
Jinowat, N., Wiboolyasarin, K., Chomchuen, F., & Wiboolyasarin, W. (2025) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/flan.70042 · Cited by 4
ARIKAN, A. (2025) · Anadolu Kültürel Araştırmalar Dergisi · doi:10.63556/ankad.v9i4.269 · Cited by 4
Unlocking the Future: A Comprehensive Review of ChatGPT in Education
Kim, D., Wang, C. K., Borowiec, K., Rein, N., Cho, J.-H. A., & Liu, J. J. (2025) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-025-09923-w · Cited by 2
Yang, C., Shao, J., & Guo, Y. (2025) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2025.2609877 · Cited by 4
GÜLDEN, B., Bilge, H., & Uysal, P. K. (2026) · International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education · doi:10.21449/ijate.1678002 · Cited by 4
Mapping the landscape: generative AI in higher education assessment (2020-2024) - a scoping review
Ng, S. H. S., Chan, H. Y., Wong, J. H. K., Sam, L. C. F., & Privitera, A. J. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2614079 · Cited by 9
WIP: A Pedagogical Prompt Engineering Framework for LLM-Based Feedback in Higher Education (PPE-LLM)
Alyahyan, E. A., Ada, M. B., & Lever, J. (2025) · IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie63693.2025.11328552 · Cited by 2
Guo, K., Li, D., & Jiang, L. G. (2026) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2026.2640476 · Cited by 2
Self-citationLu, D., & Zeng, Y. (2026) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2026.2653887 · Cited by 5
From Crafting Text to Crafting Thought: Grounding AI Writing Support to Writing Center Pedagogy
Liu, Y., Gallagher, J., Sterman, S., & August, T. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790292 · Cited by 4
Wang, X., Yang, Q., Hao, Y., Wang, Z., & Guo, S. (2026) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2026.101051 · Cited by 3
Alkhalifah, E. S., & Almutlaq, S. A. (2026) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440261453413 · Cited by 4
Wolf, M. K., Suhan, M., Deane, P., Sova, L., & Alderman, J. (2026) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2026.101083 · Cited by 2
Ekşi, S., FURTUN, S., & FURTUN, M. H. K. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1860972 · Cited by 4
Yingxia Li, W. D. (2023) · Frontiers in Educational Research · doi:10.25236/fer.2023.062809 · Cited by 5
A Framework for the Responsible Integration of Generative AI Tools in Learning
Ko, S., & Chan, S. C. H. (2024) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-1017-6.ch006 · Cited by 2
Potential of Artificial Intelligence Tools for Text Evaluation and Feedback Provision
Bogolepova, S. V. (2025) · Professional Discourse & Communication · doi:10.24833/2687-0126-2025-7-1-70-88 · Cited by 3
Li, X., Xu, Y., Li, P., & Shi, Y. (2025) · Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering · doi:10.1177/14727978251321645 · Cited by 2
Uso de los chatbots y asistentes virtuales en la mejora de la fluidez oral en ingles
Panchi, F. S. P., Panchi, M. N. P., & Panchi, P. D. P. (2025) · MENTOR revista de investigación educativa y deportiva · doi:10.56200/mried.v4i11.10079 · Cited by 2
AI for Language Teacher Professional Development: Advancing Through Human-ChatGPT Collaboration
Liu, W. (2025) · New perspectives on languages. · doi:10.56395/41jkbr71 · Cited by 3
Performance of Artificial Intelligence: Does Artificial Intelligence Dream of Electric SheepPreprint
Ioku, T., Kondo, S., & Watanabe, Y. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.35542/osf.io/pgy5f · Cited by 2
ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning
Zou, B., & Wang, C. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-51447-0_97-1 · Cited by 4
Mustafa, Ş. (2025) · i-manager s Journal on School Educational Technology · doi:10.26634/jsch.20.3.21784 · Cited by 1
ChatGpt4o mini as an AI teacher assessor in Chinese EFL writing classrooms
Zhang, Q., Huang, J., Liu, Y., & Whipple, P. B. (2025) · Asia Pacific Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/02188791.2025.2539267 · Cited by 1
Shin, D., & Lee, J. H. (2025) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2025.2549037 · Cited by 1
Alghasab, M. B. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15091138 · Cited by 4
He, J., Li, T., Xu, Z., & Xie, K. (2025) · Future education and learning spaces · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-9251-4_11 · Cited by 2
Avelino, Z. L. (2025) · Integrated Science Education Journal · doi:10.37251/isej.v6i3.2133 · Cited by 1
Self-Regulated Language Learning and Generative AI: A Systematic Review
Özturan, T. (2025) · Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi · doi:10.52597/buje.1751534 · Cited by 7
Motivations of Tertiary-Level Students to Use Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) to Cheat
Tutor, B. O. D., Lopez-Tutor, M. J., & Bernardo, L. M. A. (2026) · Lecture notes in educational technology · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-2521-8_36 · Cited by 1
Tu, Y.-F., Guo, X.-G., & Liu, A.-R. (2026) · Journal of Computers in Education · doi:10.1007/s40692-025-00382-x · Cited by 1
Cao, X., Chen, Z., & Wei, W. (2025) · International Conference on Educational Technology (ICET) · doi:10.1109/icet67421.2025.11380530 · Cited by 2
Comparing Teacher and ChatGPT Feedback in EFL/ESL Writing
Hamzehloo, M., Azar, A. S., & Hamzehloo, M. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-5601-3.ch007 · Cited by 1
Towards AI Literacy in L1 Education: Examining L1 Teachers’ Beliefs About Generative AI
Stevens, E., van Rijt, J., Bluijs, S., & Bax, S. (2026) · Digital studies in language and literature · doi:10.1515/dsll-2025-0003 · Cited by 2
Uzun, A., SEVİM, O., & Sevim, S. A. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2625390 · Cited by 3
Zhou, B., Lim, S. P., Kabir, N., Asna, A., & Nan, L. T. (2026) · Problems of Education in the 21st Century · doi:10.33225/pec/26.84.229 · Cited by 6
Ton‐Nu, A. T., & Barrot, J. S. (2026) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2026.2642394 · Cited by 2
Zimik, H. R., Aujirapongpan, S., & Waluyo, B. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106673 · Cited by 2
Zhong, Y., Tan, S., Lei, W., & Wang, X. (2026) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2026.104031 · Cited by 1
Interplay effects of AI feedback and individual differences on learners’ emotional responses
xiangming, L., & Wei, W. (2026) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-026-13937-x · Cited by 4
Who wrote this? College students’ perceptions and evaluations of human and AI-facilitated feedback
He, J., & Xie, K. (2026) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2026.2645798 · Cited by 1
Mei, H., Xiao, H., Liu, H., & Li, L. (2026) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/00336882261437883 · Cited by 2
Artificial Intelligence in Mobile-Interactive EFL Learning Environments
Zhou, B., Lim, S. P., Kabir, N., Bouteraa, M., & Asna, A. (2026) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v20i08.59677 · Cited by 5
Li, S., Wang, S., & Huang, Y. (2026) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2026.2671207 · Cited by 2
Ouhayou, C. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-19585-2_16 · Cited by 1
Readiness and adoption of generative AI in K-12 education: Perspectives from Australian teachers
Petraki, E., Chapman, B. L., & Ross, A. S. (2026) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-026-14061-6 · Cited by 3
Optimisation of university instructors’ professional practice through AI agents: a systematic review
Doszhanov, B., Zhumadilla, B., & Zhapparbergenov, R. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1893124 · Cited by 1
Xue, J., & Chen, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1786221 · Cited by 4
Using LLM chatbots for feedback in L2 English academic writing: a scoping review
Ho, N. N. Y., Rappa, N. A., & Wishart, J. (2026) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2026.2698704 · Cited by 1
Yao, Y., Rong, M., & Lou, N. M. (2026) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2026.101340 · Cited by 1
Moradi, H. (2026) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331261468164 · Cited by 1
Exploring student engagement with ChatGPT feedback: A classroom study of JFL learners
Takahashi, J., & Kadowaki, Y. (2026) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/flan.70072 · Cited by 2
LLM-Generated Feedback in L2 Writing: A Scoping Review
Craven, L., & Fredrick, D. R. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16081196 · Cited by 4
GenAI-mediated feedback for EFL writing: effects, student uptake and ethics: a systematic review
Sulistiyo, U., Angraini, D., & Fikri, H. M. (2026) · Learning Futures and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1108/lfet-04-2026-0052 · Cited by 1
Automating task design: bridging the gap between second language research and L2 instruction
Castellví, J., Gilabert, R., & Comelles, E. (2024) · TEISEL Tecnologías para la investigación en segundas lenguas · doi:10.1344/teisel.v3.45855 · Cited by 1
AI-Based Feedback Model in Supporting Mobile-Assisted Language Learning Environment
Chen, J. (2024) · International Conference on Software, Systems and Information Technology (SSITCON) · doi:10.1109/ssitcon62437.2024.10796990 · Cited by 3
Perceptions of ChatGPT's Reliability and Efficacy for Academic Tasks Among Saudi University Students
Amal, A. (2025) · Modern English Education · doi:10.18095/meeso.2025.26.1.242 · Cited by 1
Wang, R., & Raman, A. L. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-6372448/v1 · Cited by 1
Pasha, M. K. (2026) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Computing · doi:10.57041/x2hg0114
“The second is the displacement of teacher expertise, and thus the suggestion in literature is for complementary configurations where AI is used to complement rather than replace teacher feedback [17].”
Structure and process: A theoretical model of intelligent elementary Chinese vocabulary teaching
Zhang, D., & Yi, T. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38358
First Insights into the Coverage of Conversational Agents in LIS Sources
Imeri, A. (2024) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.1149
Wu, X., Zhu, S., Zhou, J., & Yao, R. (2024) · IEEE Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, Intl Conf on Cloud and Big Data Computing, Intl Conf on Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/CyberSciTech) · doi:10.1109/cyberscitech64112.2024.00088
Huang, Z., & Tan, B. (2024) · Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.54097/e7azj733 · Cited by 1
Xiong, X.-G., & Zeng, M. (2024) · International Conference on Big Data and Education (ICBDE) · doi:10.1145/3704289.3704300
郑伊彬, & 叶新东 (2025) · 教育学刊 · doi:10.62836/jer.v3n2.0219
Enhancing Feedback Mechanisms in English Language Assessments Through Deep Learning Model
Selvi, M., Zeeshan, G. A., Al-Omari, O. M., Mishra, A. K., Giftsy Dorcas, E., & Alphonse, F. R. (2024) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Quantum Computation-Based Sensor Application (ICAIQSA) · doi:10.1109/icaiqsa64000.2024.10882425
Zhu, Q. (2025) · Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences · doi:10.2478/amns-2025-0324
Effectiveness and moderating factors of computer-mediated feedback in L2 writing: A meta-analysis
Park, S. (2025) · International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies · doi:10.55493/5019.v14i1.5328
Teaching Reform of the “Principles of Management” Course in the Context of Artificial Intelligence
He, X., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Higher education and practice. · doi:10.62381/h241604
Liu, G. (2025) · Chinese as a Second Language (漢語教學研究—美國中文教師學會學報) The journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association USA · doi:10.1075/csl.00066.liu
Ntereke, B. B., Ramoroka, B. T., & Conteh, B. (2025) · Interciencia · doi:10.59671/jqd71 · Cited by 2
The AIMED model: Creating opportunities for AI in Higher EducationPreprint
Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., Neubert, C., Hauck, J., & Böhme, R. (2025) · EdArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/pzk9t_v1
Inteligencia artificial para aprender idiomas entre universitarios japoneses
Aroz, A., Hirose, H., Nishimura, K., & Cassany, D. (2025) · Cuadernos CANELA: Revista anual de Literatura, Pensamiento e Historia, Metodología de la Enseñanza del Español como Lengua Extranjera y Lingüística de la Confederación Académica Nipona, Española y Latinoamericana · doi:10.2107/canela.36.0_145
Metadata
- Authors
- Guo, K., & Wang, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Deliang
- Venue
- Education and Information Technologies
- Published
- 2023-08-29
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 8435-8463
- ISSN
- 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7608
- OpenAlex
- W4386253646
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 191 · 2025: 166 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 503.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › English Language Learning and Teaching
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, large language models, teacher feedback, EFL writing, argumentative writing, automated feedback, teacher perceptions, Chinese undergraduates, writing development, teacher-AI collaboration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
