The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
To resist it or to embrace it? Examining ChatGPT’s potential to support teacher feedback in EFL writing
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The second is the displacement of teacher expertise, and thus the suggestion in literature is for complementary configurations where AI is used to complement rather than replace teacher feedback [17].”
In the citing paper
“First, with the aid of this technology, students may be able to complete tasks for which they lack the necessary skills, such as creating photographs and getting some ideas from other disciplines (Guo & Wang, 2023).”
From A Scoping Review on How Generative Artificial Intelligence Transforms Assessment in Higher Education (2024) · cites this paper as Guo & Wang, 2023
In the citing paper
“AI has the potential to lessen individual biases in grading procedures, including essays, project proposals, and theses (Guo & Wang, 2023).”
From A Scoping Review on How Generative Artificial Intelligence Transforms Assessment in Higher Education (2024) · cites this paper as Guo & Wang, 2023
In the citing paper
“Various assignment types, including essays and computer coding, are impacted differently by GenAI (Fergus et al., 2023; Greiner et al., 2023; Guo & Wang, 2023; Naidu & Sevnarayan, 2023; Ouh et al., 2023; Smolansky et al., 2023).”
From A Scoping Review on How Generative Artificial Intelligence Transforms Assessment in Higher Education (2024) · cites this paper as Guo & Wang, 2023
In the citing paper
“This finding can be attributed to the specific and actionable nature of AI-generated feedback, which often focused on surface-level issues such as grammar, spelling, and vocabulary.”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo & Wang, 2024
In the citing paper
“In contrast, teacher-generated feedback is typically concise, formative, and context-sensitive, focusing on critical areas for improvement in a more targeted manner.”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo and Wang (2024)
In the citing paper
“Research by Guo and Wang (2024) and Yoon et al. (2023) highlights that AI-generated feedback tends to be lengthier and more overwhelming, often containing redundant or overly generic suggestions.”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo and Wang (2024)
In the citing paper
“In contrast, teacher-generated feedback tended to focus selectively on content-specific and language-specific aspects, with a preference for indirect feedback types, such as 'informative' or 'querying' remarks.”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo and Wang (2024)
In the citing paper
“Their findings revealed that while AI-generated feedback was greater in volume and primarily direct, it was evenly distributed across content, language, and organizational issues.”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo and Wang (2024)
In the citing paper
“In contrast, AI-generated feedback demonstrates a more consistent distribution across local and global issues (Guo & Wang, 2024) as well as a high agreement with instructors (Dai et al., 2023)”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo & Wang, 2024
In the citing paper
“In contrast, teacher-generated feedback offers more contextualized, selective insights tailored to both content-specific and language-specific aspects of students' work (Guo & Wang, 2024; Yoon et al., 2023).”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo & Wang, 2024
In the citing paper
“According to the literature, AI-generated feedback provides a greater volume of direct, concise, and formative suggestions, often focused on surface-level issues like grammar and vocabulary.”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo & Wang, 2024
In the citing paper
“The slight advantage of the AIGFTGF order can be attributed to the nature of AI-generated feedback, which is particularly effective at addressing surface-level issues, such as grammar, vocabulary, and basic organization (Guo & Wang, 2024; Lin & Crosthwaite, 2024; Yoon et al., 2023).”
From Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences (2025) · cites this paper as Guo & Wang, 2024
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback
Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C. L., Mishkin, P., Zhang, C., Agarwal, S., Slama, K., Ray, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.02155 · Cited by 4,208
Kung, T. H., Cheatham, M., Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., De Leon, L., Elepaño, C., Madriaga, M., Aggabao, R., Diaz-Candido, G., Maningo, J., et al. (2023) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198 · Cited by 4,115
ChatGPT: five priorities for research
van Dis, E. A. M., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7 · Cited by 1,842 · cited 1×
“…human-like responses to users’ prompts in a conversational manner, acting as a chatbot, and has become a versatile tool with a range of applications, such as composing poetry, commenting on news, debugging code, writing essays, and summarising literature (Taecharungroj, 2023; van Dis et al., 2023).”
ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?
(2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9 · Cited by 1,806 · cited 2×
“In the realm of education, researchers have been discussing ChatGPT’s implications for teaching and learning (Garcia-Peñalvo, 2023; Rudolph et al., 2023; Zhai, 2022) and exploring its potential use in various subjects, such as journalism and media (Pavlik, 2023), medicine (Gilson et al., 2022; Khan…”
Pavlik, J. V. (2023) · Journalism & Mass Communication Educator · doi:10.1177/10776958221149577 · Cited by 972 · cited 1×
“…ChatGPT’s implications for teaching and learning (Garcia-Peñalvo, 2023; Rudolph et al., 2023; Zhai, 2022) and exploring its potential use in various subjects, such as journalism and media (Pavlik, 2023), medicine (Gilson et al., 2022; Khan et al., 2023), and engineering education (Qadir, 2022).”
Prompt Programming for Large Language Models: Beyond the Few-Shot Paradigm
Reynolds, L., & McDonell, K. (2021) · Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411763.3451760 · Cited by 952 · cited 1×
“In the future, researchers may pay attention to the importance of prompt programming (Reynolds & McDonell, 2021) and attempt diverse inputs and compare their output results to identify effective ways to use ChatGPT for performing the desired task of feedback generation.”
ChatGPT User Experience: Implications for Education
Zhai, X. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4312418 · Cited by 935 · cited 1×
“…realm of education, researchers have been discussing ChatGPT’s implications for teaching and learning (Garcia-Peñalvo, 2023; Rudolph et al., 2023; Zhai, 2022) and exploring its potential use in various subjects, such as journalism and media (Pavlik, 2023), medicine (Gilson et al., 2022; Khan et…”
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Radford, A., Wu, J., Child, R., Luan, D., Amodei, D., Sutskever, I., et al. (2019). Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog, 1(8), 9. Retrieved 15 January 2023 from https://life-extension.github.io/2020/05/27/GPT%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%88%9D%E6%8E%A2/language-models.pdf
- Stiennon, N., Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Ziegler, D. M., Lowe, R., Voss, C., Radford, A., Amodei, D., & Christiano, P. (2020). Learning to summarize from human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.01325. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 451
Yang, C. T.-Y., & Chen, H. H.-J. (2025) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2025.2453205 · Cited by 23
L2 learners’ engagement with AI-generated feedback on writing
Ma, X., Zhang, C., & LEE, I. B. H. (2026) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2026.101020 · Cited by 34
Yan, Y., Sun, W., & Zhao, X. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1430494 · Cited by 31
Luo, S., & Zou, D. (2024) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12886 · Cited by 28
Cui, Y. H., Meng, Y., Zhang, X., & Tang, L. (2025) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/00336882251347978 · Cited by 22
Tabari, M. A., Kushki, A., & Wang, Y. (2025) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2025.2561608 · Cited by 24
Du, Y., & Reynolds, B. L. (2025) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105307 · Cited by 22
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Enhancing EFL Writing Skills among High School Students
Alzahrani, D. F. K. J., & Alotaibi, D. H. H. (2024) · Journal of Educational and Human Sciences · doi:10.33193/jeahs.34.2024.482 · Cited by 16
Yang, G., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Yang, M., Zeng, Q., & Song, Z. (2025) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-024-00962-y · Cited by 15
Tai, H., Lin, M., & Chen, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.12777 · Cited by 23
Adapt or adopt? Examining the efficacy of ChatGPT in providing translation feedback
Su, Y., Xu, S., & Liu, K. (2025) · The Interpreter and Translator Trainer · doi:10.1080/1750399x.2025.2541486 · Cited by 19
Zhang, Y., & Liu, Y. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2571846 · Cited by 21
A Systematic Review of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Second Language Writing Education
Luo, Y., Xia, Y., & Lu, X. (2025) · Digital studies in language and literature · doi:10.1515/dsll-2025-0001 · Cited by 21
Chen, X., Jia, B., Peng, X., Zhao, H., Yao, J., Wang, Z., & Zhu, S. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13471-2 · Cited by 14
From First Draft to Final Insight: A Multi-agent Approach for Feedback Generation
Cao, J., Zhao, C. Q., Chen, X., Wang, S., Schunn, C. D., Koedinger, K. R., & Lin, J. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-98417-4_12 · Cited by 14
Dong, L. (2025) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2025.103875 · Cited by 16
Teng, L. S., Deng, X., & Yang, J. (2026) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2026.103970 · Cited by 16
Deng, L., & Jamaludin, K. A. (2026) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440261418315 · Cited by 24
Li, J., Zhu, S., Yang, H. H., & Xu, J. (2024) · International Symposium on Educational Technology · doi:10.1109/iset61814.2024.00013 · Cited by 15
ChatGPT im Unterricht Deutsch als Fremdsprache
TEKİN, Ö. (2023) · Alman Dili ve Kültürü Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.55143/alkad.1390420 · Cited by 20
Arifin, M. A., Rahman, A. A., Balla, A., Susanto, A. K., & Pratiwi, A. C. (2025) · Changing English · doi:10.1080/1358684x.2024.2418132 · Cited by 13
Evaluating the Potential of Generative Artificial Intelligence to Innovate Feedback Processes
Huesca, G., Elizondo-García, M. E., Aguayo-González, R., Aguayo-Hernández, C. H., González-Buenrostro, T., & Verdugo-Jasso, Y. A. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15040505 · Cited by 13
Lin, X. Y. (2025) · The Australian Educational Researcher · doi:10.1007/s13384-025-00856-y · Cited by 13
Stretching AI's reach: Assessing an AI-driven feedback system for extended academic writing
Lo, J., Wong, C., Ng, A., Wong, P., Cheung, D., & Lai, P. P. Y. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100511 · Cited by 20
Aksakallı, C., & Daşer, Z. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-07437-3 · Cited by 22
AI Tools for Language Learners: The Promotion of Learning Independence or Reliance
Tin, D. T. (2025) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-01348-4_11 · Cited by 14
Jovic, M., Papakonstantinidis, S., & Kirkpatrick, R. (2025) · Language Testing in Asia · doi:10.1186/s40468-025-00389-2 · Cited by 11
Guo, K., Zhong, Y., Qin, J., & Chu, S. K. W. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2024.2372646 · Cited by 14
Self-citationWhy AI will not Democratize Education: a Critical Pragmatist Perspective
Wieczorek, M. (2025) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-025-00883-8 · Cited by 11
Sim, S., Kim, Y., & Ku, K. (2025) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.70010 · Cited by 10
Прибыткова, А. А., Tormyshova, T. Y., & Хаустов, О. Н. (2024) · Вестник Тамбовского университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки · doi:10.20310/1810-0201-2024-29-2-378-389 · Cited by 10
Uddın, M. M. (2024) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-024-00349-7 · Cited by 10
Aladini, A., Mahmud, R., & Ali, A. A. H. (2024) · Language Testing in Asia · doi:10.1186/s40468-024-00334-9 · Cited by 15
A Systematic Review of EFL Teachers’ Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence Technologies
Özkan, E. K., Erdemir, N., & Coşkun, D. (2024) · Ihlara Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.47479/ihead.1535035 · Cited by 23
Zhang, Y., & Liu, Y. (2025) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2025.2539156 · Cited by 11
AI versus human assessment in EFL speaking classrooms: a comparative study in China
Liu, X., Huang, J., Deng, Y., & Spiridakis, J. (2025) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2025.2530555 · Cited by 11
Özhan, Ş. Ç., Tekeli, P., & Kocadere, S. A. (2025) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.70134 · Cited by 13
Acceptance of generative AI in higher education: A latent profile analysis of policy guidelinesPreprint
Ioku, T., Kondo, S., & Watanabe, Y. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4515787/v1 · Cited by 18
Su, Y., Luo, M., & Zhong, C. (2025) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251321853 · Cited by 17
Castro, M. P., & Sekli, G. M. (2025) · Journal of Education for Business · doi:10.1080/08832323.2025.2470731 · Cited by 12
Yang, Y., & Lin, C. (2025) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2025.2513988 · Cited by 12
Lu, D., & Zeng, Y. (2025) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688251397578 · Cited by 11
Ning, Y., Seah, W. T., Chen, J., Liu, J., & Tan, P. (2026) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105572 · Cited by 10
Tang, J., Zhang, A., Sun, M., Leng, X., & Luo, L. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1754495 · Cited by 17
Abudalfa, S. I., & Barrot, J. S. (2026) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2026.101041 · Cited by 15
Incorporating ChatGPT as an automated written corrective feedback tool into L2 writing class
Zhang, Y. (2024) · Journal of Language Teaching · doi:10.54475/jlt.2024.024 · Cited by 13
Tomorrowland? Technical Innovation and Feedback on Writing
Hyland, K. (2025) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/00336882251357675 · Cited by 13
Tian, S., & Xiang, H. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13725-z · Cited by 12
Guardia-Paniura, C. H., Cueva-Luza, T., Cruz-Carpio, F. M., Ito-Díaz, R. R., Apaza-Paco, D. V., Rosas-Rojas, N., Mamani-Mamani, B., Terrero-Pérez, Á., Yaedú, R. Y. F., & Peralta-Mamani, M. (2026) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/17863 · Cited by 8
Tormyshova, T. Y., Ryazantseva, T. Y., & Sukhanova, N. I. (2024) · Вестник Тамбовского университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки · doi:10.20310/1810-0201-2024-29-1-99-108 · Cited by 8
Parameter-Efficiently Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Classroom Dialogue Analysis
Wang, D., Zheng, Y., Li, J., & Chen, G. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2025.3567995 · Cited by 9
Self-citationZhu, S., Li, J., Yao, Y., Guan, Y., & Zhu, X. (2025) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101040 · Cited by 9
Yıldız, M., Topuz, A. C., Polat, H., Taşlıbeyaz, E., Kurşun, E., & Yeşilyurt, S. (2025) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2025.2539797 · Cited by 8
Li, J., Huang, J., & Sheeran, T. J. (2025) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251369938 · Cited by 10
Artificial intelligence as a mentor in the graduate online classroom: opportunities and challenges
Kellam, H., Cortés, L. P., & Gilmore, T. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1108/aiie-10-2024-0034 · Cited by 9
Embrace or resist? EFL teachers on adopting ChatGPT as a teaching and feedback tool
Saeli, H., Rahmati, P., Dalman, M., Shamsi, Y., & Koltovskaia, S. (2025) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658416.2025.2577191 · Cited by 13
Navío-Inglés, M., Mora, J. G., O’Connor-Jiménez, P., & González, A. G. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15111534 · Cited by 11
Tran, H., Crosthwaite, P. R., & Pham, Q. H. P. (2025) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101578 · Cited by 20
GenAI in Academic Writing- Empowering Learners or Redefining Traditional Pedagogical Practices?
Zaheer, S., Ma, C., Zhu, Y., & Vasinda, S. (2025) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.4018/ijaitl.373582 · Cited by 12
Teaching students to communicate in a foreign language through artificial intelligence technologies
Прибыткова, А. А., Ryazantseva, T. Y., & Хаустов, О. Н. (2025) · Вестник Тамбовского университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки · doi:10.20310/1810-0201-2025-30-1-94-106 · Cited by 6
Exploring the GenAI Literacy of Chinese University Students in EFL Learning
Li, T., & Ding, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.4018/ijcallt.377175 · Cited by 9
Yue, H., Palermo, C., Liu, R., & He, Y. (2025) · Chinese/English Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation · doi:10.59863/famj7696 · Cited by 9
Enhancing creative writing through AI-powered co-creation with cognitive and emotional outcomes
Cen, X., & Shakibaei, G. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-34416-2 · Cited by 12
ChatNVD: Advancing Cybersecurity Vulnerability Assessment With Large Language Models
Chopra, S., Ahmad, H., Goel, D., & Szabo, C. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2026.3659205 · Cited by 20
Qu, Z., & Chen, L. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1799695 · Cited by 11
Understanding EFL teachers’ affective and cognitive responses to ChatGPT in higher education
Wang, C., Zou, B., Zhang, W., Du, Y., & Hu, W. (2026) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-026-07360-3 · Cited by 9
The Effect of Feedback on Informative Text Writing: AI or Teacher?
Baz, M. A., & Hasırcı, S. (2025) · Open Praxis · doi:10.55982/openpraxis.17.3.871 · Cited by 12
Wang, J., & Guo, K. (2025) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2025.103857 · Cited by 8
Self-citationZhu, R., Wang, H., & Qin, X. (2025) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2025.2586142 · Cited by 7
Applying the AI assessment scale in writing and translation for EFL
Roe, J., Perkins, M., & Furze, L. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1108/aiie-02-2025-0034 · Cited by 21
Hu, Y.-H., Yu, H.-Y., & Hsieh, C.-L. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13784-2 · Cited by 9
Almusharraf, A. M., & Bailey, D. (2025) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251387804 · Cited by 10
Wang, Y., Hu, W., & Guo, Q. (2025) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2025.103967 · Cited by 8
Impact of prompt sophistication on ChatGPT’s output for automated written corrective feedback
Luo, N., Wang, Y., Zhang, Z. (., Zhou, Y., & Zhao, R. (2025) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s095834402510044x · Cited by 10
Li, X., Wang, X., & Daems, J. (2026) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2026.2631658 · Cited by 5
Xu, Y., Zhong, J., & Han, Y. (2026) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2026.105501 · Cited by 7
Lai, C., Pan, M., Guo, K., & Cui, Y. (2026) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105675 · Cited by 11
Self-citationThe Integration of ChatGPT in Language Education
Liu, W. (2024) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-0872-1.ch001 · Cited by 7
Nguyen, H. N., Nguyen, D. T. K., Tran, L. P. T., & Nguyen, T. T. H. (2024) · AsiaCALL Online Journal · doi:10.54855/acoj.241514 · Cited by 8
ŞENTÜRK, R., & Göktaş, S. A. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Spectrum · doi:10.47806/ijesacademic.1527105 · Cited by 8
Leveraging Multimodal GenAI Chatbots in EFL Learning: Learning Attitudes and User Experiences
Huang, H.-W., Chen, X., & Sankey, A. (2024) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Teacher Education (ICAITE) · doi:10.1145/3702386.3702406 · Cited by 9
Zhang, X., Huang, R., Zhang, R., Li, M., Tu, Y., Chen, Y., Hu, L., & Hwang, G. (2025) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.70131 · Cited by 6
Reconstructing stance in EFL doctoral thesis writing through generative artificial intelligence
Zhao, W. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-06249-x · Cited by 9
Huang, B., Xie, S., & Hew, T. K. F. (2026) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2025.2611980 · Cited by 5
Uygun, E., & Demir, B. (2026) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-026-01504-y · Cited by 15
Huo, H., Zhang, L. J., & Zhang, D. (2026) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2026.2691927 · Cited by 4
A Systematic Review of the Potential Influencing Factors for ChatGPT-Assisted Education
Xu, C. (2024) · International Journal of Technology-Enhanced Education · doi:10.4018/ijtee.339189 · Cited by 10
AN INVESTIGATION ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CHATBOTS IN EVALUATING WRITING ASSIGNMENTS IN EFL CONTEXTS
Toscu, S. (2024) · Mehmet Akif Ersoy üniversitesi eğitim fakültesi dergisi. · doi:10.21764/maeuefd.1425384 · Cited by 11
Ataş, A. H., Cengiz, B. C., & Çelik, B. (2024) · Sakarya University Journal of Education · doi:10.19126/suje.1475474 · Cited by 6
Gil, K. L., & Mosquera, E. M. (2025) · Revista Virtual Universidad Católica del Norte · doi:10.35575/rvucn.n74a6 · Cited by 10
Wang, C., Tian, Z., & Christiansen, M. S. (2025) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101229 · Cited by 4
Khozaei, F., Carbon, C., Islam, Q. U., & Ravari, Z. K. (2025) · The Open Psychology Journal · doi:10.2174/0118743501364500250515043823 · Cited by 5
Zhao, Y., Xu, Y., & Long, T. (2025) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-025-10241-0 · Cited by 3
Leveraging ChatGPT for L2 Writing: Teacher Cognition and the Impact of Professional Development
Rahmati, P., Hoomanfard, M. H., & Saeli, H. (2025) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.70011 · Cited by 4
Fredriksson, A.-L. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1612398 · Cited by 3
Enhancing collaborative writing with AI-enhanced feedback in graduate-level action research courses
Vu, P., & Vu, L. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1108/aiie-03-2025-0042 · Cited by 3
Li, X., Wang, W., & Gu, L. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2587925 · Cited by 4
ChatGPT-4o as an automated scoring tool for writing assessment: Strengths and weaknesses
Karaçeper, R. D., & Kıray, G. (2026) · International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education · doi:10.21449/ijate.1701871 · Cited by 5
Liu, J., Shi, Z., & Li, W. (2026) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2026.101030 · Cited by 7
Can ChatGPT score ESL writing? A correlation analysis between teacher and GenAI scores
Alkhofi, A. (2026) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688261415584 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Guo, K., & Wang, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Deliang
- Venue
- Education and Information Technologies
- Published
- 2023-08-29
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 8435-8463
- ISSN
- 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7608
- OpenAlex
- W4386253646
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 191 · 2025: 166 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 503.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › English Language Learning and Teaching
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, large language models, teacher feedback, EFL writing, argumentative writing, automated feedback, teacher perceptions, Chinese undergraduates, writing development, teacher-AI collaboration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
