CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17Augmented Reality ApplicationsSTEM EducationMultimedia Learning Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impacts of augmented reality-supported STEM education on students' achievement: A meta-analysis of selected SSCI publications from 2010 to 2023

Wang, Xiao-Ming, Yu, Dan-Dan, Yu, Xiao-Han, Hwang, Gwo-Jen, Li, Feiming·2024·Education and Information Technologies
DOI 10.1007/s10639-024-12641-y
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10639-024-12641-y

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 92

  1. Ajit, G. (2021). A systematic review of augmented reality in stem education. Studies of Applied Economics, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i1.4280 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Akçayır, M., Akçayır, G., Pektaş, H. M., & Ocak, M. A. (2016). Augmented reality in science laboratories: The effects of augmented reality on university students’ laboratory skills and attitudes toward science laboratories. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 334–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.054 · DOI
  4. AlNajdi, S. M. (2022). The effectiveness of using augmented reality (AR) to enhance student performance: Using quick response (QR) codes in student textbooks in the Saudi education system. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(3), 1105–1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10100-4 · DOI
  5. Altmeyer, K., Kapp, S., Thees, M., Malone, S., Kuhn, J., & Brünken, R. (2020). The use of augmented reality to foster conceptual knowledge acquisition in STEM laboratory courses—Theoretical background and empirical results. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12900 · DOI
  6. Álvarez-Marín, A., & Velázquez-Iturbide, J. Á. (2021). Augmented reality and engineering education: A systematic review. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 14(6), 817–831. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2022.3144356 · DOI
  7. Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X025004005 · DOI
  8. Avci, S. K., Coklar, A. N., & Istanbullu, A. (2019). The Effect of Three Dimensional Virtual Environments and Augmented Reality Applications on The Learning Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study. EGITIM VE BILIM-Education and Science, 44(198), 149–182. https://doi.org/10.15390/eb.2019.7969 · DOI
  9. Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education (Vol. 1): Springer Publishing Company.
  10. Bassyouni, Z., & Elhajj, I. H. (2021). Augmented reality meets artificial intelligence in robotics: A systematic review. Frontiers in Robotics and A, I, 296. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.724798 · DOI
  11. Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 1088–1101. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533446 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Bekerman, Z., Burbules, N. C., & Silberman-Keller, D. (2006). Learning in places: The informal education reader (Vol. 249): Peter Lang.
  13. Bhagat, K. K., Liou, W.-K., Michael Spector, J., & Chang, C.-Y. (2019). To use augmented reality or not in formative assessment: A comparative study. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(5–6), 830–840. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1489857 · DOI
  14. Bhagat, K. K., Yang, F.-Y., Cheng, C.-H., Zhang, Y., & Liou, W.-K. (2021). Tracking the process and motivation of math learning with augmented reality. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(6), 3153–3178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10066-9 · DOI
  15. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021). Introduction to meta-analysis: John Wiley & Sons. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Cai, S., Chiang, F.-K., Sun, Y., Lin, C., & Lee, J. J. (2017). Applications of augmented reality-based natural interactive learning in magnetic field instruction. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(6), 778–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1181094 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Cai, S., Wang, X., & Chiang, F.-K. (2014). A case study of Augmented Reality simulation system application in a chemistry course. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.018 · DOI
  18. Chang, C.-C., Hwang, G.-J., & Tu, Y.-F. (2022). Concept mapping in technology-supported K-12 education: A systematic review of selected SSCI publications from 2001 to 2020. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 07356331211073798. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211073798 · DOI
  19. Chang, R.-C., Chung, L.-Y., & Huang, Y.-M. (2016). Developing an interactive augmented reality system as a complement to plant education and comparing its effectiveness with video learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1245–1264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.982131 · DOI
  20. Chang, S.-C., & Hwang, G.-J. (2018). Impacts of an augmented reality-based flipped learning guiding approach on students’ scientific project performance and perceptions. Computers & Education, 125, 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.007 · DOI
  21. Chang, K. E., Chang, C. T., Hou, H. T., Sung, Y. T., Chao, H. L., & Lee, C. M. (2014). Development and behavioral pattern analysis of a mobile guide system with augmented reality for painting appreciation instruction in an art museum. Computers & education, 71, 185-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.022 · DOI
  22. Chatzopoulos, D., Bermejo, C., Huang, Z., & Hui, P. (2017). Mobile augmented reality survey: From where we are to where we go. IEEE ACCESS, 5, 6917–6950. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2698164 · DOI
  23. Chen, C. M., & Tsai, Y. N. (2012). Interactive augmented reality system for enhancing library instruction in elementary schools. Computers & Education, 59(2), 638-652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.001 · DOI
  24. *Chen, C.-C., Chen, H.-R., & Wang, T.-Y. (2022). Creative situated augmented reality learning for astronomy curricula. Educational Technology & Society, 25(2), 148–162. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48660130
  25. Chen, C. H., Yang, C. K., Huang, K., & Yao, K. C. (2020). Augmented reality and competition in robotics education: Effects on 21st century competencies, group collaboration and learning motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(6), 1052–1062. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12469 · DOI
  26. Chen, Y.-H., & Wang, C.-H. (2018). Learner presence, perception, and learning achievements in augmented–reality–mediated learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(5), 695–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1399148 · DOI
  27. Chiang, T. H., Yang, S. J., & Hwang, G.-J. (2014). An augmented reality-based mobile learning system to improve students’ learning achievements and motivations in natural science inquiry activities. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352–365.
  28. Chu, S. T., Hwang, G. J., & Tu, Y. F. (2022). Artificial intelligence-based robots in education: A systematic review of selected SSCI publications. Computers and education: Artificial intelligence, 100091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100091 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  30. Dewey, J. (1986). Experience and Education: In the Educational Forum. Informa UK Limited, 50(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131728609335764 · DOI
  31. Duman, G., Orhon, G., & Gedik, N. (2015). Research trends in mobile assisted language learning from 2000 to 2012. ReCALL, 27(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344014000287 · DOI
  32. Echeverría, A., Améstica, M., Gil, F., Nussbaum, M., Barrios, E., & Leclerc, S. (2012). Exploring different technological platforms for supporting co-located collaborative games in the classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1170–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.027 · DOI
  33. Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3–4), 391–450. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0803&4_3 · DOI
  34. Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Erbas, C., & Demirer, V. (2019). The effects of augmented reality on students’ academic achievement and motivation in a biology course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 450–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12350 · DOI
  36. Fidan, M., & Tuncel, M. (2019). Integrating augmented reality into problem-based learning: The effects on learning achievement and attitude in physics education. Computers and Education,142 · DOI
  37. Furió, D., González-Gancedo, S., Juan, M.-C., Seguí, I., & Costa, M. (2013). The effects of the size and weight of a mobile device on an educational game. Computers & Education 64, 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.015 · DOI
  38. *Furió, D., Juan, M. C., Seguí, I., & Vivó, R. (2015). Mobile learning vs. traditional classroom lessons: a comparative study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 189–201. · DOI
  39. Garzón, J., & Acevedo, J. (2019). Meta-analysis of the impact of Augmented Reality on students’ learning gains. Educational Research Review, 27, 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12071 · DOI
  40. Garzón, J., Baldiris, S., Gutiérrez, J., & Pavón, J. (2020). How do pedagogical approaches affect the impact of augmented reality on education? A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Educational Research Review, 31,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100334 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Garzón, J., Pavón, J., & Baldiris, S. (2019). Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00379-9 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Gecu-Parmaksiz, Z., & Delialioglu, O. (2019). Augmented reality-based virtual manipulatives versus physical manipulatives for teaching geometric shapes to preschool children. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3376–3390. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12740 · DOI
  43. *Giasiranis, S., & Sofos, L. (2017). Flow experience and educational effectiveness of teaching informatics using AR. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 78–88. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26229207
  44. Goff, E. E., Mulvey, K. L., Irvin, M. J., & Hartstone-Rose, A. (2018). Applications of augmented reality in informal science learning sites: A review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(5), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9734-4 · DOI
  45. Harzing, A.-W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (2014). Statistical methods for meta-analysis: Academic press.
  47. Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring Inconsistency in Meta-Analyses. Bmj, 327(7414), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · DOI · Paper page
  48. *Hou, H.-T., Fang, Y.-S., & Tang, J. T. (2021). Designing an alternate reality board game with augmented reality and multi-dimensional scaffolding for promoting spatial and logical ability. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1961810 · DOI
  49. Hsiao, H.-S., Chang, C.-S., Lin, C.-Y., & Wang, Y.-Z. (2016). Weather observers: A manipulative augmented reality system for weather simulations at home, in the classroom, and at a museum. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.834829 · DOI
  50. Hsiao, K.-F., Chen, N.-S., & Huang, S.-Y. (2012). Learning while exercising for science education in augmented reality among adolescents. Interactive Learning Environments, 20(4), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2010.486682 · DOI
  51. Hsu, Y.-S., Lin, Y.-H., & Yang, B. (2017). Impact of augmented reality lessons on students’ STEM interest. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0039-z · DOI
  52. Huang, T.-C., Chen, C.-C., & Chou, Y.-W. (2016). Animating eco-education: To see, feel, and discover in an augmented reality-based experiential learning environment. Computers & Education, 96, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.008 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Hwang, G. J., & Wu, P. H. (2014). Applications, impacts and trends of mobile technology-enhanced learning: A review of 2008–2012 publications in selected SSCI journals. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 8(2), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmlo.2014.062346 · DOI
  54. Ibáñez, M. B., Di Serio, Á., Villarán, D., & Kloos, C. D. (2014). Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: Impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness. Computers & Education, 71, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.004 · DOI
  55. *Ibáñez, M. B., Portillo, A. U., Cabada, R. Z., & Barrón, M. L. (2020). Impact of augmented reality technology on academic achievement and motivation of students from public and private Mexican schools. A case study in a middle-school geometry course. Computers & Education, 145, 103734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103734 · DOI
  56. Kajonmanee, T., Chaipidech, P., Srisawasdi, N., & Chaipah, K. (2020). A personalised mobile learning system for promoting STEM discipline teachers’ TPACK development. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 14(2), 215–235. · DOI
  57. Kalemkuş, J., & Kalemkuş, F. (2022). Effect of the use of augmented reality applications on academic achievement of student in science education: meta- analysis review. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2027458 · DOI
  58. *Kao, G. Y.-M., & Ruan, C.-A. (2022). Designing and evaluating a high interactive augmented reality system for programming learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107245 · DOI
  59. Kim, M., & Dopico, E. (2016). Science education through informal education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(2), 439–445. · DOI
  60. Kljun, M., Geroimenko, V., & Čopič Pucihar, K. (2020). Augmented Reality in Education: Current Status and Advancement of the Field. In V. Geroimenko (Ed.), Augmented Reality in Education: A New Technology for Teaching and Learning (pp. 3–21). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42156-4_1 · DOI
  61. Lai, C. L. (2020). Trends of mobile learning: A review of the top 100 highly cited papers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 721–742. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12884 · DOI
  62. Lai, J. W., & Cheong, K. H. (2022). Adoption of virtual and augmented reality for mathematics education: A scoping review. IEEE Access, 10, 13693–13703. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3145991 · DOI
  63. Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. E. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: A systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6 · DOI
  64. Lin, H.-C.K., Chen, M.-C., & Chang, C.-K. (2015). Assessing the effectiveness of learning solid geometry by using an augmented reality-assisted learning system. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(6), 799–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.817435 · DOI
  65. Lin, T.-J., Duh, H.B.-L., Li, N., Wang, H.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). An investigation of learners’ collaborative knowledge construction performances and behavior patterns in an augmented reality simulation system. Computers & Education, 68, 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.011 · DOI
  66. Lindgren, R., Tscholl, M., Wang, S., & Johnson, E. (2016). Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Computers & Education, 95, 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.001 · DOI
  67. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Sage.
  68. Liu, Q., Yu, S., Chen, W., Wang, Q., & Xu, S. (2021). The effects of an augmented reality based magnetic experimental tool on students’ knowledge improvement and cognitive load. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(3), 645–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12513 · DOI
  69. Mattar, J. (2018). Constructivism and connectivism in education technology: Active, situated, authentic, experiential, and anchored learning. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.21.2.20055 · DOI
  70. Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 41, pp. 85–139): Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(02)80005-6 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 77(12), 1321–1329.
  72. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Group*, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Mystakidis, S., Christopoulos, A., & Pellas, N. (2022). A systematic mapping review of augmented reality applications to support STEM learning in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10682-1 · DOI
  74. Olsson-Collentine, A., Wicherts, J. M., & van Assen, M. A. (2020). Heterogeneity in direct replications in psychology and its association with effect size. Psychological Bulletin, 146(10), 922. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000294 · DOI
  75. Ozdemir, M., Sahin, C., Arcagok, S., & Demir, M. K. (2018). The effect of augmented reality applications in the learning process: A meta-analysis study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 18(74), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2018.74.9 · DOI
  76. Panciroli, C., Fabbri, M., Luigini, A., Macauda, A., Corazza, L., & Russo, V. (2023). Augmented Reality in Arts Education. In Springer Handbook of Augmented Reality (pp. 305–333): Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67822-7_12 · DOI
  77. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · DOI · Paper page
  78. Sahin, D., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2020). The effect of Augmented Reality Technology on middle school students’ achievements and attitudes towards science education. Computers & Education, 144,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103710 · DOI · Paper page
  79. Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective sixth edition: Pearson.
  80. Sindre, G., Giannakos, M., Krogstie, B. R., Munkvold, R., & Aalberg, T. (2018). Project-based learning in IT education: definitions and qualities. Uniped, 41(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn1893-8981-2018-02-06 · DOI
  81. Sırakaya, M., & Alsancak Sırakaya, D. (2022). Augmented reality in STEM education: A systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1722713 · DOI · Paper page
  82. Siriwardhana, Y., Porambage, P., Liyanage, M., & Ylianttila, M. (2021). A survey on mobile augmented reality with 5G mobile edge computing: Architectures, applications, and technical aspects. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 23(2), 1160–1192. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2021.3061981 · DOI
  83. Sommerauer, P., & Müller, O. (2014). Augmented reality in informal learning environments: A field experiment in a mathematics exhibition. Computers & Education, 79, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.013 · DOI
  84. Thees, M., Kapp, S., Strzys, M. P., Beil, F., Lukowicz, P., & Kuhn, J. (2020). Effects of augmented reality on learning and cognitive load in university physics laboratory courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 108,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106316 · DOI
  85. Vemer, E., Coleman, M., Ganong, L. H., & Cooper, H. (1989). Marital satisfaction in remarriage: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 713–725. https://doi.org/10.2307/352170 · DOI
  86. Wang, Y. H. (2017). Using augmented reality to support a software editing course for college students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 532–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12199 · DOI
  87. Wu, H.-K., Lee, S.W.-Y., Chang, H.-Y., & Liang, J.-C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024 · DOI · Paper page
  88. Xu, W.-W., Su, C.-Y., Hu, Y., & Chen, C.-H. (2022). Exploring the effectiveness and moderators of augmented reality on science learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(5), 621–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09982-z · DOI
  89. Yang, F.-C.O., Lai, H.-M., & Wang, Y.-W. (2023). Effect of augmented reality-based virtual educational robotics on programming students’ enjoyment of learning, computational thinking skills, and academic achievement. Computers & Education, 195,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104721 · DOI
  90. *Yoon, S., Anderson, E., Lin, J., & Elinich, K. (2017). How augmented reality enables conceptual understanding of challenging science content. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 156–168. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jeductechsoci.20.1.156 · DOI
  91. Yousef, A. M. F. (2021). Augmented reality assisted learning achievement, motivation, and creativity for children of low-grade in primary school. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(4), 966–977. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12536 · DOI · Paper page
  92. Zhang, J., Sung, Y.-T., Hou, H.-T., & Chang, K.-E. (2014). The development and evaluation of an augmented reality-based armillary sphere for astronomical observation instruction. Computers & Education, 73, 178–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.003 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 17

Metadata

Authors
Wang, X.-M., Yu, D.-D., Yu, X.-H., Hwang, G.-J., & Li, F.
Affiliations
  • Zhejiang Normal University (CN)
  • National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
Corresponding author
Wang, Xiao-Ming
ORCID
Venue
Education and Information Technologies
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2024-04-22
Volume
29
Issue
15
Pages
20547-20585
ISSN
  • 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7608
DOI
10.1007/s10639-024-12641-y
OpenAlex
W4394999852
Cited by
17
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
  • Social Sciences › Education › STEM Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Multimedia Learning Systems
Keywords
augmented reality, STEM education, academic performance, science achievement, mathematics achievement, mobile devices, multimedia learning, informal learning environments, primary and lower secondary education, intervention duration, educational technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review