Cited by 607Higher Education Research StudiesStudent Stress and CopingEducational Outcomes and Influences

Adjustment to College as Measured by the Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire: A Quantitative Review of its Structure and Relationships with Correlates and Consequences

Credé, Marcus, Niehorster, Sarah·2012·Educational Psychology Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10648-011-9184-5

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Credé, M., & Niehorster, S.
Affiliations
State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Credé, Marcus
Venue
Educational Psychology Review
Published
2011-11-18
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
133-165
ISSN
  • 1040-726X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-336X
OpenAlex
W2045314856
Cited by
607
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 92 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 1
FWCI
40.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
Keywords
college adjustment, Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire, academic performance, college retention, social support, parent-child relationship, individual differences, demographic predictors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review