Cited by 43Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research Topics

Cognitive and Interpersonal Vulnerabilities to Adolescent Depression: Classification of Risk Profiles for a Personalized Prevention Approach

Open access
Hankin, Benjamin L., Young, Jami F., Gallop, Robert, Garber, Judy·2018·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract

Despite interest in psychosocial vulnerabilities to depression, little is known about reliable and valid individualized risk profiles that can be used to match individuals to evidence-based interventions for depression. This study investigated well-established cognitive and interpersonal vulnerabilities to depression among youth to discern an evidence-based risk classification approach which is being used in a personalized depression prevention randomized clinical trial. Data were drawn from a general community sample of adolescents (N = 467; ages 10-16, mean 13.14, SD = 1.62; 57% females) who were followed prospectively for 3 years. Youth completed measures of cognitive (negative cognitive style, dysfunctional attitudes, rumination) and interpersonal (support and conflict with peers and parents, excessive reassurance seeking, social competence, co-rumination) risks to depression, and then were followed longitudinally for onset of depression. Principal axis factor analyses showed that three latent factors--cognitive vulnerability, interpersonal support, and interpersonal conflict--optimally represented the structure of these risk factors. Clinically practical and meaningful cutoffs, based on tertile cut-off scores on cognitive and interpersonal risk measures, were used to categorize youth into relatively balanced high and low cognitive and interpersonal risk groups. These risk classification groups exhibited validity (AUC > 0.70) by predicting prospective onsets of depressive episodes at 18-months follow-ups. These findings demonstrate a reliable and valid approach to synthesize psychosocial vulnerabilities to depression, specifically cognitive and interpersonal risks. Results are discussed in terms of using these risk classifications profiles to test personalized prevention of depression during adolescence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10802-018-0401-2

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Abela JRZ Hankin BL 2008 Cognitive vulnerability to depression in children and adolescents: A developmental psychopathology approach Abela JRZ Hankin BL Handbook of Child and Adolescent Depression 35 78 New York, NY Guilford Press
  2. Hammen CL Shih J 2014 Depression and interpersonal processes Gotlib IH Hammen CL Handbook of depression 3 277 295 New York, NY Guilford Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hankin, B. L., Young, J. F., Gallop, R., & Garber, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • West Chester University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Hankin, Benjamin L.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
2018-01-25
Volume
46
Issue
7
Pages
1521-1533
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W2785379266
Cited by
43
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (5R01MH077195, 5R01MH077178, R21MH102210, R01MH105501)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
adolescent depression, cognitive vulnerability, interpersonal vulnerability, personalized prevention, risk classification, negative cognitive style, dysfunctional attitudes, rumination, co-rumination, reassurance seeking, social competence, peer support, parent-child conflict
MeSH terms
Rumination, Cognitive, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Child, Depression, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Risk Factors, Thinking, Reproducibility of Results, Risk Assessment, Social Skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review