Cited by 296Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 24 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Executive Functioning Heterogeneity in Pediatric ADHD

Open access

Abstract

Neurocognitive heterogeneity is increasingly recognized as a valid phenomenon in ADHD, with most estimates suggesting that executive dysfunction is present in only about 33%-50% of these children. However, recent critiques question the veracity of these estimates because our understanding of executive functioning in ADHD is based, in large part, on data from single tasks developed to detect gross neurological impairment rather than the specific executive processes hypothesized to underlie the ADHD phenotype. The current study is the first to comprehensively assess heterogeneity in all three primary executive functions in ADHD using a criterion battery that includes multiple tests per construct (working memory, inhibitory control, set shifting). Children ages 8-13 (M = 10.37, SD = 1.39) with and without ADHD (N = 136; 64 girls; 62% Caucasian/Non-Hispanic) completed a counterbalanced series of executive function tests. Accounting for task unreliability, results indicated significantly improved sensitivity and specificity relative to prior estimates, with 89% of children with ADHD demonstrating objectively-defined impairment on at least one executive function (62% impaired working memory, 27% impaired inhibitory control, 38% impaired set shifting; 54% impaired on one executive function, 35% impaired on two or all three executive functions). Children with working memory deficits showed higher parent- and teacher-reported ADHD inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive symptoms (BF 10 = 5.23 × 10 4), and were slightly younger (BF 10 = 11.35) than children without working memory deficits. Children with vs. without set shifting or inhibitory control deficits did not differ on ADHD symptoms, age, gender, IQ, SES, or medication status. Taken together, these findings confirm that ADHD is characterized by neurocognitive heterogeneity, while suggesting that contemporary, cognitively-informed criteria may provide improved precision for identifying a smaller number of neuropsychologically-impaired subtypes than previously described.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10802-018-0438-2

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

3 of 24 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 24 claims

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

  • Ethnicity counts omit five participants

    Minor

    The ethnicity categories total 131 children, but the stated sample contains 136. The text does not identify an ethnicity category or missing ethnicity data for the other five children.

    Reported 136 · recomputed 131

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 94 references

3 of the 94 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kofler, M. J., Sarver, D. E., Harmon, S. L., Moltisanti, A., Aduen, P. A., Soto, E. F., & Ferretti, N. (2017). Working memory and organizational skills problems in ADHD. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.
  2. Sattler, J., Dumont, R., & Coalson, D. (2016). Assessment of Children: WISC-V and WPPSI-IV. San Diego: Sattler Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 296

Metadata

Authors
Kofler, M. J., Irwin, L. N., Soto, E. F., Groves, N. B., Harmon, S. L., & Sarver, D. E.
Affiliations
  • Florida State University (US)
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Kofler, Michael J.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
2018-04-28
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
273-286
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W2799310259
Cited by
288
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3
FWCI
14.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R34 MH102499)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, executive function, working memory, inhibitory control, set-shifting, executive dysfunction, diagnostic criteria, inattentive symptoms, hyperactive-impulsive symptoms, children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-26 (prompt extract-v2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review