Cited by 26Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentWorkplace Violence and Bullying

Bullying Victimization and Developmental Trajectories of Internalizing and Externalizing Problems: The Moderating Role of Locus of Control Among Children

Gong, Xue, Huebner, E. Scott, Tian, Lili·2021·Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology

Abstract

This longitudinal study examined the developmental trajectories of internalizing and externalizing problems, as well as the moderating role of children's locus of control on the relations between traditional and cyberbullying victimization and developmental trajectories of internalizing and externalizing problems. A total of 4180 Chinese elementary school students (M age = 9.90 years) completed measures of bullying victimization (Time 1), locus of control (Time 1), internalizing and externalizing problems (from Time 1 to Time 5, 6-month intervals). Latent growth curve analyses indicated (a) internalizing problems first gradually decreased and then increased across time, whereas externalizing problems decreased slowly and remained steady over time; (b) both traditional and cyberbullying victimization served as risk factors for internalizing and externalizing problems; however, the effects of traditional bullying victimization on internalizing and externalizing problems were stronger than those for cyberbullying victimization; (c) locus of control moderated the relations between traditional bullying victimization and developmental trajectories of internalizing and externalizing problems. Consistent with cognitive diathesis-stress models, children who experienced higher levels of traditional bullying victimization and reported an external locus of control were more likely to experience internalizing and externalizing problems. This study also identified meaningful gender differences. Implications for the prevention of behavior problems were discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10802-020-00752-2

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gong, X., Huebner, E. S., & Tian, L.
Affiliations
  • South China Normal University (CN)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Tian, Lili
Venue
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
Published
2021-01-06
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
351-366
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 2730-7166
  • 2730-7174
OpenAlex
W3120062145
Cited by
26
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
Keywords
bullying victimization, cyberbullying, traditional bullying, locus of control, internalizing problems, externalizing problems, developmental trajectories, moderating effect, gender differences, elementary school students, Chinese children
MeSH terms
Cyberbullying, Child, Humans, Internal-External Control, Longitudinal Studies, Crime Victims, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review