Cited by 120Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFamily and Disability Support ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fascination and Isolation: A Grounded Theory Exploration of Unusual Sensory Experiences in Adults with Asperger Syndrome

Smith, Richard S., Sharp, Jonathan·2013·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

Unusual sensory experiences are commonly seen in people with Asperger syndrome (AS). They correlate with functional impairments and cause distress. The current study investigates how these experiences have affected nine adults with AS's lives, as well as the coping strategies utilised. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using Instant Messaging software. Data were analysed using Grounded Theory. A number of inter-related categories and focused codes were identified. The categories included heightened senses, sensory stress, the stress avalanche, moderating factors, coping strategies, other people, self-acceptance, fascination, and isolation. A model was constructed as to how these categories and codes interact. How these findings link with previous research into autism spectrum disorders is discussed. Implications for services and future research are also made.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-012-1633-6

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical gudie through qualitative analysis. London: SAGE.
  2. Singer, J. (1999). ‘Why can’t you be normal for once in your life?’ From a ‘problem with no name’ to the emergence of a new category of difference. In M. Corker & S. French (Eds.), Disability discourse (pp. 59–67). Buckingham: Open University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–120 of 120

Metadata

Authors
Smith, R. S., & Sharp, J.
Affiliations
  • Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • St Mary's Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Smith, Richard S.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2012-08-25
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
891-910
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2067975863
Cited by
120
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
Asperger syndrome, coping strategies, fascination, social isolation, self-acceptance, autism spectrum disorder, autistic adults
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Perceptual Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychological Theory, Sensation Disorders, Social Isolation, Stress, Psychological, Internet, Asperger Syndrome, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review