Cited by 697Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesBehavioral and Psychological Studies

The Diagnostic Interview for Social and Communication Disorders: background, inter‐rater reliability and clinical use

Open access
Wing, Lorna, Leekam, Susan R., Libby, Sarah J., Gould, Judith, Larcombe, Michael·2002·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: The Diagnostic Interview for Social and Communication Disorders (DISCO) is a schedule for the diagnosis of autistic spectrum and related disorders and assessment of individual needs. It enables information to be recorded systematically for a wide range of behaviours and developmental skills and is suitable for use with all ages and levels of ability. In addition to helping the clinician to obtain a profile of each individual's pattern of development and behaviour, the DISCO also enables identification of specific features found in autistic spectrum disorders that are relevant for use with established diagnostic systems. Method: This paper describes the historical background of the DISCO, outlines its structure and reports the results of an inter‐rater reliability study with parents of 82 children aged 3 to 11 years with autistic spectrum disorder, learning disability, language disorder or typical development. Results: Inter‐rater reliability for the items in the interview was high (kappa coefficient or intra‐class correlation at .75 or higher). This level of agreement was achieved for over 80% of the interview items.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1469-7610.00023

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wing, L., Leekam, S. R., Libby, S. J., Gould, J., & Larcombe, M.
Affiliations
  • Durham University (GB)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • University of Plymouth (GB)
Corresponding author
Wing, Lorna
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-03
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
307-325
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2118415569
Cited by
694
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 44
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Kent
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
disco, autism spectrum disorder, inter-rater reliability, diagnostic interview, learning disabilities, language disorders, parent interviews, developmental assessment, children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Autistic Disorder, Child, Communication Disorders, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Sensitivity and Specificity, Social Behavior Disorders, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review