Cited by 59Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychological Treatments and Assessments

School based cognitive behavioural therapy targeting anxiety in children with autistic spectrum disorder: a quasi-experimental randomised controlled trail incorporating a mixed methods approach

Open access
Clarke, Chris, Hill, Vivian, Charman, Tony·2017·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

Children with a diagnosis of autism are more likely to experience anxiety than their typically developing peers. Research suggests that Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) could offer a way to help children with autism manage their anxiety but most evidence is based on clinical trials. This study investigated a school-based CBT programme using a quasi-experimental design incorporating the child and parent versions of the Spence Children's Anxiety Scale (Spence, J Abnorm Psy 106(2):280-297, 1997) and the Coping Scale for Children and Youth (Brodzinsky et al., J Appl Dev Psychol 13:195-214, 1992). Interview data was incorporated to help understand the process of change further. Children in the experimental condition had lower levels of anxiety, maintained at follow-up and changes were found in coping behaviours such as lower behavioural avoidance strategies but increased problem solving strategies at follow-up. Limitations of the research together with future directions are also discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-016-2801-x

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This finding of good acceptability to participants is consistent with that of other CBT-based interventions with children and adolescents with autism, providing further evidence for the suitability of this approach with young autistic people.

    “This finding of good acceptability to participants is consistent with that of other CBT-based interventions with children and adolescents with autism (e.g., Clarke et al., 2016; McConachie et al., 2014), providing further evidence for the suitability of this approach with young autistic people.”

    From The design and implementation of a CBT-based intervention for sensory processing difficulties in adolescents on the autism spectrum (2016) · cites this paper as Clarke et al., 2016

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Barlow, D.H. (2002) Unraveling the mysteries of anxiety and its disorders from the perspective of emotion theory. American Psychologist, 55(11), 1247-1263.
  2. Spirito, A., Stark, L.J. & Williams, C. (1988) Development of a brief coping checklist for use with pediatric populations. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 13, 555-574.
  3. Williams, M.E., Atkins, M. & Soles, T. (2009) Assessment of Autism in Community Settings: Discrepancies in Classification. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 39(4), 660-669.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clarke, C., Hill, V., & Charman, T.
Affiliations
  • Children's Therapy Center (US)
  • University College London (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Clarke, Chris
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2016-04-30
Volume
47
Issue
12
Pages
3883-3895
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2344306096
Cited by
59
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, autism spectrum disorder, childhood anxiety, school-based intervention, Spence Children's Anxiety Scale, coping strategies, avoidance behavior, problem solving, change processes
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Anxiety, Child, England, Female, Humans, Male, Problem Solving, School Health Services, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review