Cited by 43Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Relations Between Executive Functions, Social Impairment, and Friendship Quality on Adjustment Among High Functioning Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Lieb, Rebecca W., Bohnert, Amy M.·2017·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

High functioning adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) often have adjustment difficulties, specifically loneliness and depression. To better understand contributing factors, the current study evaluated associations between several Executive Function (EF) domains, social impairment, and friendship quality on depressive symptoms and loneliness in this population. Participants included 127 high functioning ASD adolescents and a parent/caregiver. Results indicated significant levels of parent-reported EF impairment which were positively correlated with increased levels of loneliness and depressive symptoms. Social impairment was identified as a significant mediator between all studied EF domains and adjustment, while friendship quality only partially mediated the relation between emotional control and loneliness. These results have implications for treatments focusing both on social skills and adjustment in adolescents with ASD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-017-3205-2

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive peer relationships are associated with lower levels of loneliness in adolescents.

    “Irrespective of the quality of evidence, the replicability of the same results and conclusions across different populations, stages of adolescence, types of friendship quality in respect to gender and whether it is between best friends only, all supported the hypothesis that positive peer relationships were associated with lower levels of loneliness [55, 62, 67–71, 93].”
  • The evidence is indicative of an association between peer relationship quality and depressed mood in adolescents.

    “The evidence is indicative of an association between peer relationship quality and depressed mood [4, 56–67, 83–86, 88, 92–95, 97, 98].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lieb, R. W., & Bohnert, A. M.
Affiliations
Loyola University Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Lieb, Rebecca W.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2017-06-17
Volume
47
Issue
9
Pages
2861-2872
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2625185912
Cited by
43
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Chicago
  • Loyola University Chicago
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, executive function, social dysfunction, friendship quality, loneliness, depressive symptoms, emotional control, social adaptation, mediation
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Depression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Loneliness, Male, Parents, Social Adjustment, Friends, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review