Cited by 352Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFamily and Disability Support ResearchHealth and Medical Studies

National and State Estimates of Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Open access
Dietz, Patricia M., Rose, Charles E., McArthur, Dedria, Maenner, Matthew·2020·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

U.S. national and state population-based estimates of adults living with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are nonexistent due to the lack of existing surveillance systems funded to address this need. Therefore, we estimated national and state prevalence of adults 18-84 years living with ASD using simulation in conjunction with Bayesian hierarchal models. In 2017, we estimated that approximately 2.21% (95% simulation interval (SI) 1.95%, 2.45%) or 5,437,988 U.S. adults aged 18 and older have ASD, with state prevalence ranging from 1.97% (95% SI 1.55%, 2.45%) in Louisiana to 2.42% (95% SI 1.93%, 2.99%) in Massachusetts. Prevalence and case estimates of adults living with ASD (diagnosed and undiagnosed) can help states estimate the need for diagnosing and providing services to those unidentified.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-020-04494-4

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pickett JA, Paculdo DR, Shavelle RM, (2006). 1998–2002 Update on “Causes of death in autism”. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(2), 287– 288. 16565885

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dietz, P. M., Rose, C. E., McArthur, D., & Maenner, M.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Dietz, Patricia M.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2020-05-10
Volume
50
Issue
12
Pages
4258-4266
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W3021253625
Cited by
351
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 71 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 5
FWCI
20.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Studies
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, autistic adults, prevalence estimation, state-level prevalence, undiagnosed autism, Bayesian hierarchical model, simulation
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Adult, Bayes Theorem, Child, Computer Simulation, Female, Humans, Male, Massachusetts, Population Surveillance, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review