Cited by 1,631Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceAdvanced Graph Neural Networks

Molecular graph convolutions: moving beyond fingerprints

Open access
Kearnes, Steven, McCloskey, Kevin, Berndl, Marc, Pande, Vijay, Riley, Patrick·2016·Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design

Abstract

Molecular "fingerprints" encoding structural information are the workhorse of cheminformatics and machine learning in drug discovery applications. However, fingerprint representations necessarily emphasize particular aspects of the molecular structure while ignoring others, rather than allowing the model to make data-driven decisions. We describe molecular graph convolutions, a machine learning architecture for learning from undirected graphs, specifically small molecules. Graph convolutions use a simple encoding of the molecular graph-atoms, bonds, distances, etc.-which allows the model to take greater advantage of information in the graph structure. Although graph convolutions do not outperform all fingerprint-based methods, they (along with other graph-based methods) represent a new paradigm in ligand-based virtual screening with exciting opportunities for future improvement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10822-016-9938-8

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Graph representation learning methods have successfully integrated patient records with molecular, genomic, and disease networks to personalize patient predictions.

    “Graph representation learning methods have been successful in integrating patient records with molecular, genomic, and disease networks to personalize patient predictions.”

    From Graph representation learning in biomedicine and healthcare (2022) · cites this paper as [104]

  • Spatial-based models are more flexible to handle multi-source graph inputs such as edge inputs, directed graphs, signed graphs, and heterogeneous graphs, because these graph inputs can be incorporated into the aggregation function easily.

    “Spatial-based models are more flexible to handle multi-source graph inputs such as edge inputs [15], [27], [86], [95], [96], directed graphs [25], [72], signed graphs [97], and heterogeneous graphs [98], [99], because these graph inputs can be incorporated into the aggregation function easily.”

    From A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks (2021) · cites this paper as [86]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]Duvenaud DK Maclaurin D Iparraguirre J Bombarell R Hirzel T Aspuru-Guzik A Adams RP Convolutional networks on graphs for learning molecular fingerprints. Advances in neural information processing systems 2015 2224 2232

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kearnes, S., McCloskey, K., Berndl, M., Pande, V., & Riley, P.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Google (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Kearnes, Steven
Venue
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
Published
2016-08
Volume
30
Issue
8
Pages
595-608
ISSN
  • 0920-654X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-4951
OpenAlex
W2290847742
Cited by
1,631
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 106 · 2025: 166 · 2024: 185 · 2023: 206 · 2022: 198 · 2021: 247 · 2020: 224 · 2019: 165 · 2018: 104 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 2
FWCI
91.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (1S10RR02664701, 5U19AI109662-02)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
Keywords
molecular fingerprints, graph neural networks, small molecules, ligand-based virtual screening, drug discovery, cheminformatics
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Computer Graphics, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Ligands, Drug Design, Molecular Structure, Neural Networks, Computer, Computer-Aided Design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review