Cited by 74Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

Religious Beliefs Affect Grieving After Pregnancy Loss

Cowchock, F. S., Lasker, J. N., Toedter, L. J., Skumanich, S. A., Koenig, H. G.·2010·Journal of Religion and Health

Abstract

Religious beliefs and practices may aid in coping with bereavement and grief after pregnancy loss. Data from 103 women enrolled in the original Lehigh Valley Perinatal Loss Project, and who were followed-up for at least 1 year, were evaluated for the impact of initial religious practices and beliefs on the course and severity of grief. Religious practices corresponding to standard scales of religiosity and agreement with specific beliefs were rated by the women on a Likert scale of 1-5. Neither agreement with statements corresponding to extrinsic and intrinsic religiosity or to positive religious coping, nor frequency of religious service attendance was predictive of follow-up scores on the Perinatal Grief Scale. Religious struggle, agreement with statements classified as negative religious coping, and continued attachment to the baby were all associated with more severe grief.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10943-009-9277-3

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cowchock, F. S., Lasker, J. N., Toedter, L. J., Skumanich, S. A., & Koenig, H. G.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Lehigh University (US)
  • Moravian University (US)
Corresponding author
Cowchock, F. S.
Venue
Journal of Religion and Health
Published
2009-08-19
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
485-497
ISSN
  • 0022-4197 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6571
OpenAlex
W1969186128
Cited by
74
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Religion and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • John Templeton Foundation
  • Lehigh University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
religious beliefs, grief, miscarriage, perinatal loss, bereavement, religiosity, religious coping, religious struggle, religious service attendance, Perinatal Grief Scale
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Attitude to Health, Bereavement, Female, Fetal Death, Humans, Mothers, Object Attachment, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Spirituality, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review