Cited by 117Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion and Society InteractionsCardiac Health and Mental Health

Religious orientation, aging, and blood pressure reactivity to interpersonal and cognitive stressors

Masters, Kevin S., Hill, Robert D., Kircher, John C., Benson, Tera L. Lensegrav, Fallon, Jennifer A.·2004·Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research on religion and health suggests general health benefits for those who are more religiously involved. Particular aspects of religiosity that may influence this finding, however, have not been sufficiently investigated. PURPOSE: This study was designed to explore the relationship between religious orientation (intrinsic, extrinsic) and blood pressure reactivity among older (over 60 years) and younger (18-24 years) adults exposed to two qualitatively different laboratory stressors (cognitive, interpersonal). METHODS: Participants were categorized as exhibiting either a predominantly intrinsic or extrinsic religious orientation based on scores on the Religious Orientation Scale. They were subsequently exposed (in counterbalanced order) to two laboratory stressors that varied in terms of whether an interpersonal confrontation was involved. Measures of blood pressure were obtained at baseline and during stressor presentation. RESULTS: Analyses indicated that older extrinsically religious individuals demonstrated exaggerated reactivity compared to younger participants and older intrinsically religious individuals. Older intrinsically religious participants did not differ from younger persons. Similar results were found for analysis of baseline data. Extrinsic participants had greater reactivity during the interpersonal confrontation condition than did intrinsic individuals. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that religious orientation may be an important variable to study regarding cardiovascular reactivity in, particularly, older adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15324796abm2803_5

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies documented multiple beneficial effects associated with certain RS dimensions (e.g., private spiritual practices and intrinsic religiosity), such as higher levels of cardiac autonomic control and lower blood pressure reactivity to stressors.

    “These studies documented multiple beneficial effects associated with certain RS dimensions (e.g., private spiritual practices and intrinsic religiosity), such as higher levels of cardiac autonomic control (Berntson et al., 2008) and lower blood pressure reactivity to stressors (Masters et al., 2004).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. George LK, Ellison CG, Larson DB: Explaining the relation- ship between religious involvement and health. Psychological Inquiry. 2002, 13:190-200.
  2. Kamarck TW, Lovallo WR: Cardiovascular reactivity to psy- chological challenge: Conceptual and measurement consider- ations. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2003, 65:9-21.
  3. Tartaro J, Gunn HE, Appelhans BM, Luecken LJ: Influence ofreported religiosity and spirituality on physiological stress re- sponses. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2002, 24(Suppl.):S077.
  4. In Hill PC, Hood Jr. RW (eds), Measures of religiosity. Bir- mingham, AL: Religious Education Press, 1999, 144-154.
  5. Koenig HG, Moberg DO, Kvale JN: Religious and health char- acteristics of patients attending a geriatric assessment clinic. Journal of the American Geriatric Society. 1988, 36:362-374.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Masters, K. S., Hill, R. D., Kircher, J. C., Benson, T. L. L., & Fallon, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Utah State University (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Masters, Kevin S.
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2004-10
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
171-178
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
OpenAlex
W2053067246
Cited by
117
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Psychological Association
  • National Institutes of Health (1r03ag018554-01)
  • National Institute on Aging (1 R03 AG 18554-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
religious orientation, intrinsic religiosity, extrinsic religiosity, blood pressure reactivity, cardiovascular reactivity, aging, older adults, cognitive stress, interpersonal stress, laboratory stressor, Religious Orientation Scale
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aging, Blood Pressure, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Religion and Medicine, Stress, Psychological, Utah

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review