Cited by 26Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsAttachment and Relationship DynamicsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Spousal autonomy support, need satisfaction, and well-being in individuals with chronic pain: A longitudinal study

Open access
Uysal, Ahmet, Ascigil, Esra, Turunc, Gamze·2017·Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

The present research examined the effect of spousal autonomy support on the need satisfaction and well-being of individuals with chronic pain. Married individuals with a diagnosed musculoskeletal chronic pain condition (N = 109) completed a baseline questionnaire and a follow-up questionnaire after a 6-month time period. Cross-lagged analyses indicated that spousal autonomy support predicted increases in basic need satisfaction, and need satisfaction predicted increases in well-being. Moreover, the analyses in the opposite direction were not significant. Similarly, cross-lagged analyses were more supportive of the direction from pain intensity to lower well-being, rather than well-being to pain intensity. Finally, we tested a longitudinal structural model using pain intensity and spousal autonomy support as the predictors, basic needs as the mediator, and well-being as the outcome. The model provided a good fit to the data. Results showed that spousal autonomy support had a positive effect on the need satisfaction and well-being of individuals with chronic pain, independent of pain intensity. These findings extend self-determination theory to the chronic pain context and lay the groundwork for future chronic pain studies using the self-determination theory framework.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10865-016-9783-1

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uysal, A., Ascigil, E., & Turunc, G.
Affiliations
Middle East Technical University (TR)
Corresponding author
Uysal, Ahmet
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2016-08-19
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
281-292
ISSN
  • 0160-7715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3521
OpenAlex
W2509725700
Cited by
26
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Aratirma Kurumu (113K531)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
chronic pain, musculoskeletal pain, need satisfaction, basic psychological needs, well-being, self-determination theory, pain intensity, marital relationships, spousal support
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Spouses, Personal Autonomy, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review