Cited by 259Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationAttachment and Relationship DynamicsPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Chronic pain in a couples context: a review and integration of theoretical models and empirical evidence

Open access
Leonard, Michelle T., Cano, Annmarie, Johansen, Ayna B.·2006·The Journal of Pain

Abstract

Unlabelled Researchers have become increasingly interested in the social context of chronic pain conditions. The purpose of this article is to provide an integrated review of the evidence linking marital functioning with chronic pain outcomes including pain severity, physical disability, pain behaviors, and psychological distress. We first present an overview of existing models that identify an association between marital functioning and pain variables. We then review the empirical evidence for a relationship between pain variables and several marital functioning variables including marital satisfaction, spousal support, spouse responses to pain, and marital interaction. On the basis of the evidence, we present a working model of marital and pain variables, identify gaps in the literature, and offer recommendations for research and clinical work.Perspective The authors provide a comprehensive review of the relationships between marital functioning and chronic pain variables to advance future research and help treatment providers understand marital processes in chronic pain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.01.442

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Catastrophizing and praying mediate race differences in experimental pain.

    “there is evidence to suggest that both catastrophizing as well as praying mediate race differences in experimental pain 162, 222.”
  • During experimental pain tasks, Black individuals have lower pain tolerance and report higher pain intensity and unpleasantness than non-Hispanic Whites.

    “Black individuals demonstrate a lower tolerance and report higher pain intensity and unpleasantness ratings than non-Hispanic Whites during experimental pain tasks 162, 221–224”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leonard, M. T., Cano, A., & Johansen, A. B.
Affiliations
Wayne State University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Pain
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-06
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
377-390
ISSN
1526-5900 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114301646
Cited by
259
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 21
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Human Biology (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH066975)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
chronic pain, couples, marital functioning, marital satisfaction, spousal support, marital interaction, pain intensity, physical disability, pain behavior, psychological distress, theoretical model
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Humans, Marriage, Models, Psychological, Pain Measurement, Intractable Pain, Pain, Intractable, Quality of Life, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review