Cited by 159Smoking Behavior and CessationDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsBehavioral Health and Interventions

Episodic future thinking reduces delay discounting and cigarette demand: an investigation of the good-subject effect

Stein, Jeffrey S., Tegge, Allison N., Turner, Jamie K., Bickel, Warren K.·2018·Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Episodic future thinking (EFT), an intervention involving mental simulation of future events, has been shown to reduce both delay discounting and cigarette self-administration. In the present study, we extended these findings by showing that EFT in a web-based sample of smokers reduces delay discounting and intensity of demand for cigarettes (ad libitum consumption) in a hypothetical purchase task. No effect was observed on elasticity of demand (sensitivity to price) or cigarette craving. We also explored whether demand characteristics (specifically, the "good-subject" effect) might be responsible for observed effects. EFT participants were significantly better able than control participants to discern the experimental hypothesis. However, EFT participants were not better than controls at identifying whether they had been assigned to the experimental group and, likewise, showed no differences in attitudes about the experiment and experimenter. Importantly, effects of EFT on delay discounting and demand remained significant even when controlling for measures of demand characteristics, indicating that EFT's effects are independent of participants' perceptions about the experiment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10865-017-9908-1

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stein, J. S., Tegge, A. N., Turner, J. K., & Bickel, W. K.
Affiliations
  • Carilion Clinic (US)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Stein, Jeffrey S.
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2017-12-21
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
269-276
ISSN
  • 0160-7715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3521
OpenAlex
W2781409553
Cited by
159
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 10
FWCI
12.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (5R01DA034755)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
episodic future thinking, delay discounting, cigarette demand, smoking, demand characteristics, mental simulation, cigarette craving, price elasticity, online intervention
MeSH terms
Cigarette Smoking, Smokers, Adult, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Male, Self Concept, Thinking, Tobacco Products, Delay Discounting, Craving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review