Cited by 241Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMemory Processes and InfluencesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Episodic future thinking: expansion of the temporal window in individuals with alcohol dependence

Open access
Snider, Sarah E., LaConte, Stephen M., Bickel, Warren K.·2016·Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Episodic future thinking (EFT) requires an individual to vividly pre-experience a realistic future event. Inspired by previous reports of reducing delay discounting following EFT in other populations, we examined the effects of engaging alcohol-dependent individuals in EFT or episodic recent thinking (ERT; control) to examine its effects on delay discounting and alcohol purchasing. METHODS: Participants (n = 50) with alcohol dependence were allocated into EFT or ERT groups and asked to generate positive future or recent past events for each of 5 time points. Participants then completed a delay-discounting task, during which event cues were displayed, and a hypothetical alcohol purchase task. RESULTS: EFT significantly increased valuation of future monetary rewards, while decreasing initial consumption (Q0 ) of alcoholic drinks indicative of lower demand intensity. Two additional findings suggest potential moderators of this effect. EFT more readily influenced individuals with lower Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test scores, and self-reported cue valence differed between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these results suggest a widening of alcohol-dependent individuals' temporal window following engagement of EFT. While our data suggest that EFT may be moderated by certain susceptibility criteria, exercises such as EFT could be easily adaptable as a potential therapeutic tool for use in rehabilitation programs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acer.13112

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Analogous effects of episodic future thinking have been observed on consumption of hypothetical alcoholic drinks in individuals with alcohol dependency problems.

    “Analogous effects have been observed on consumption of hypothetical alcoholic drinks in individuals with alcohol dependency problems (74)”

    From Episodic Future Thinking: Mechanisms and Functions (2017) · cites this paper as [74]

  • EFT has previously been shown to decrease DD in individuals with alcohol use disorder, smokers, as well as normal weight, overweight, and obese populations.

    “EFT has previously been shown to decrease DD in individuals with alcholol use disorder [32], smokers [33], as well as normal weight, overweight, and obese populations [34,35].”
  • EFT may reduce the demand for hypothetical drinks, self-administration of cigarettes, and self-administration and valuation of highly palatable snacks in overweight and/or obese adults and children.

    “Consistent with the reinforcer pathology concept, EFT may reduce the demand for hypothetical drinks [32], self-administration of cigarettes [33], and self-administration and valuation of highly palatable snacks in overweight and/or obese adults and children [35,36].”
  • Episodic future thinking produces reductions in hypothetical alcohol consumption.

    “hypothetical alcohol consumption (Bulley & Gullo, 2017; Snider, LaConte, & Bickel, 2016)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mazur JE 1987 An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement Quantitative Analysis of Behavior: The Effect of Delay and of Intervent Events on Reinforcement Commons ML Mazur J Nevin JA Rachlin H 55 76 Psychology Press Hillsdale

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Snider, S. E., LaConte, S. M., & Bickel, W. K.
Affiliations
Carilion Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Bickel, Warren K.
Venue
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-06-01
Volume
40
Issue
7
Pages
1558-1566
ISSN
0145-6008 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2410276799
Cited by
241
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 8
FWCI
26.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA021529)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
episodic future thinking, alcoholism, delay discounting, alcohol purchasing, temporal window, alcohol use disorder severity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Ethanol, Alcoholism, Commerce, Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Thinking, Time Factors, Young Adult, Delay Discounting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review