CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 623Generational Differences and TrendsJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorRetirement, Disability, and Employment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Generational Differences in Work-Related Attitudes: A Meta-analysis

Costanza, David P., Badger, Jessica M., Fraser, Rebecca L., Severt, Jamie B., Gade, Paul A.·2012·Journal of Business and Psychology
DOI 10.1007/s10869-012-9259-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10869-012-9259-4

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 98 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Burke, M. E. (2004). Generational differences survey report. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resources Management.
  2. *Chan, D. S. (2006). Relationship between generation-responsive leadership behaviors and job satisfaction of Generations X and Y professionals. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 66(10), 3712.
  3. *Daboval, J. M. (1998). A comparison between baby boomer and generation × employees’ bases and foci of commitment. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 59(2), 543.
  4. *Dudley, C. M., Burnfield-Geimer, J., & Erdheim, J. (2009, April). Generational differences in federal government employee attitudes and perceptions. Paper presented at the 24th annual conference of the Society for Industrial & Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.
  5. *Eaton, D. E. (2009). An investigation of generational differences in job satisfaction in a bureaucratic environment. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 69(11), 4403.
  6. *Faulk, M. A. (1997). Personal and generational correlates of work outcomes: An inter-generational exploration. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 58(4), 1360.
  7. Gade, P. A. (2009). The human dimension: Life course theory and research. Arlington, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral Sciences.
  8. Hamblett, C., & Deverson, J. (1965). Generation X. London: Tandem Books.
  9. *Hollman, P. J. (2009). Generational membership and organizational commitment in a Fortune 100 firm. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 69(8), 3212.
  10. Macky, K., Gardner, D., & Forsyth, S. (2008b). Generational differences at work: Introduction and overview. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 857–861. doi: 10.1108/02683940810904358 . · DOI
  11. *Miller, E. J. (2007). The effect of rewards, commitment, organizational climate and work values on intentions to leave: Is there a difference among generations? Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 68(1), 259.
  12. *Moody, A. (2008). Examining and exploring generational differences by understanding commitment, employee satisfaction, and motivation. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 69(1), 286.
  13. *Patalano, C. (2008). A study of the relationship between generational group identification and organizational commitment: Generation X vs. Generation Y. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 69(2), 671.
  14. Sackett, P. R. (2002). Letter report. Washington, DC: The National Academies, Division of Behavioural and Social Sciences and Education.
  15. Schmidt, F. L., & Le, H. (2004). Software for the Hunter–Schmidt meta-analysis methods. Iowa City: University of Iowa, Department of Management & Organizations.
  16. *Sujdak, E. J. (2003). An investigation of the correlation of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, perceived job opportunity, organizational communications, job search behavior, and the intent to turnover in IT professionals. Dissertation Abstracts International, Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 63(8), 2940.
  17. Trzesniewski, K. H., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010b). Rethinking “Generation Me”: A study of cohort effects from 1976–2006. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(1), 58–75. doi: 10.1177/1745691609356789 . · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 616

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Costanza, D. P., Badger, J. M., Fraser, R. L., Severt, J. B., & Gade, P. A.
Affiliations
  • George Washington University (US)
  • United States Army (US)
Corresponding author
Costanza, David P.
ORCID
Costanza, David P.
Venue
Journal of Business and Psychology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2012-03-11
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
375-394
ISSN
  • 0889-3268 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-353X
DOI
10.1007/s10869-012-9259-4
OpenAlex
W1988477424
Cited by
623
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Business and Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Generational Differences and Trends
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Keywords
generational differences, work-related attitudes, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, baby boomers, millennials, Generation X, traditionalists, generational cohorts, workplace interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review