Cited by 132Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEmployee Performance and ManagementWorkplace Health and Well-being

When Is Silence Golden? A Meta-analysis on Antecedents and Outcomes of Employee Silence

Hao, Leilei, Zhu, Hui, He, Yuqian, Duan, Jinyun, Zhao, Teng, Meng, Hui·2022·Journal of Business and Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10869-021-09788-7

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hao, L., Zhu, H., He, Y., Duan, J., Zhao, T., & Meng, H.
Affiliations
  • East China Normal University (CN)
  • Auburn University (US)
Corresponding author
Meng, Hui
Venue
Journal of Business and Psychology
Published
2022-02-02
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
1039-1063
ISSN
  • 0889-3268 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-353X
OpenAlex
W4210411010
Cited by
132
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 4
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Business and Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
employee silence, employee voice, employee attitudes, task performance, organizational citizenship behavior, psychological safety, autonomy, behavioral activation system, behavioral inhibition system, employee well-being, personality dispositions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review