Cited by 80Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyCancer survivorship and care

Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction in Medical Settings

Shigaki, Cheryl L., Glass, Bret, Schopp, Laura H.·2006·Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10880-006-9033-8

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shigaki, C. L., Glass, B., & Schopp, L. H.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Shigaki, Cheryl L.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
Published
2006-05-23
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
209-216
ISSN
  • 1068-9583 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3572
OpenAlex
W2033712227
Cited by
79
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
mindfulness-based stress reduction, meditation, chronic pain, cancer, heart disease, psychological intervention, stress reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review