Cited by 18Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Assessment of Chronic Illness-Related Cognitive Fusion: Preliminary Development and Validation of a New Scale with an IBD Sample

Open access
Trindade, Inês A., Ferreira, Cláudia, Pinto-Gouveia, José·2018·Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings

Abstract

Although research recognizes the advantages of creating specific content measures, no specific measure of chronic illness-related cognitive fusion had been developed to date. The current study presents the development and validation of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire-Chronic Illness (CFQ-CI) in a sample of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients and the analysis of the role of this construct in the psychological health of those patients. Results indicated that the 7-item CFQ-CI was a unidimensional measure of cognitive fusion in patients with chronic illnesses, and that scores had adequate/good internal consistency and construct, convergent, and discriminant validity. This study also showed that chronic illness-related cognitive fusion as assessed by the CFQ-CI acted as a mediator in the association between both IBD-related symptoms and shame with quality of life. The development of the CFQ-CI may thus contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms influencing functional outcomes in chronic illness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10880-017-9536-5

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The correlations of CFQ-CI with depression, social anxiety, and self-compassion support the concurrent validity of CFQ-CI.

    “These results are consistent with the original version (29), showing the concurrent validity of CFQ-CI.”

    From Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire-Chronic Illness in Multiple Sclerosis (2022) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Construct validity section reports correlations between the CFQ-CI and other measures, and the Discussion concludes that its scores appear valid. But the reported correlations concern measures such as general cognitive fusion, shame, brooding, and quality of life—not depression, social anxiety, or self-compassion. The source therefore supports the general validity point, but not validity based on those specific correlations. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Changes in cognitive fusion, rather than IBD symptomatology, predicted improvements in psychological health.

    “Moreover, changes in cognitive fusion rather than IBD symptomatology predicted improvements in psychological health.”

    From Brief and Telehealth Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) Interventions for Stress in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD): A Series of Single Case Experimental Design (SCED) Studies (2022) · cites this paper as [32]

    The path-analysis results report that cognitive fusion predicted psychological quality of life, but also that IBD symptomatology indirectly predicted it through shame and cognitive fusion. The Discussion states that the study was cross-sectional and calls for longitudinal research; it did not measure changes or improvements over time. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cognitive fusion is negatively associated with psychological and physical health in IBD and mediates the relationship between chronic-illness-related stigma and psychological quality of life.

    “For example, the ACT process of cognitive fusion—the tendency to perceive and act on thoughts through a context of literality—has been observed to be negatively associated with psychological and physical health in IBD and mediates the relationship between chronic-illness-related stigma and psychological QoL [31,32].”

    From Brief and Telehealth Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) Interventions for Stress in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD): A Series of Single Case Experimental Design (SCED) Studies (2022) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Discussion reports that chronic illness-related cognitive fusion was associated with lower psychological and physical well-being in the IBD sample. The path-model results report that it partially mediated the relationship between chronic illness-related shame and psychological quality of life, but the measured factor was shame, not stigma. Page numbers were not supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The internal consistency of CFQ-CI agrees with the original version's high internal consistency estimates.

    “This finding agrees with our predictions and the findings of the original version (29), reporting high internal consistency estimates.”
  • The 1-factor structure of CFQ-CI found in this study is consistent with the original version in inflammatory bowel disease patients.

    “This finding is consistent with the original version showing the 1-factor structure in patients with IBD (29).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pinto-Gouveia, J., Gregório, S., Dinis, A., & Xavier, A. (2012). Experiential avoidance in clinical and nonclinical samples. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 12(2), 139-156.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trindade, I. A., Ferreira, C., & Pinto-Gouveia, J.
Affiliations
University of Coimbra (PT)
Corresponding author
Trindade, Inês A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
Published
2018-02-19
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
356-366
ISSN
  • 1068-9583 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3572
OpenAlex
W2788391942
Cited by
18
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/101906/2014)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
cognitive fusion, chronic disease, inflammatory bowel disease, scale development, mental health, shame, quality of life, mediation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Chronic Disease, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Portugal, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Shame, Reproducibility of Results, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Young Adult, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review