Cited by 33Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsEmotions and Moral BehaviorSuicide and Self-Harm Studies

Shame and Depressive Symptoms: Self-compassion and Contingent Self-worth as Mediators?

Zhang, Huaiyu, Carr, Erika R., Garcia-Williams, Amanda G., Siegelman, Asher E., Berke, Danielle, Niles-Carnes, Larisa V., Patterson, Bobbi, Watson-Singleton, Natalie N. +1 more·2018·Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings

Abstract

Research has identified the experience of shame as a relevant predictor of depressive symptoms. Building upon resilience theory, this is the first study to investigate if self-compassion and/or contingent self-worth (i.e., family support and God's love) mediate the link between shame and depressive symptoms. Participants were 109 African Americans, within the age range of 18 and 64, who sought service following a suicide attempt from a public hospital that serves mostly low-income patients. Findings suggest that shame was related to depressive symptoms through self-compassion but not through contingent self-worth, underscoring the significant role that self-compassion plays in ameliorating the aggravating effect of shame on depressive symptoms. Results highlight the value of incorporating self-compassion training into interventions for suicidal African Americans in an effort to reduce the impact of shame on their depressive symptoms and ultimately their suicidal behavior and as a result enhance their capacity for resilience.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10880-018-9548-9

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, H., Carr, E. R., Garcia-Williams, A. G., Siegelman, A. E., Berke, D., Niles-Carnes, L. V., Patterson, B., Watson-Singleton, N. N., & Kaslow, N. J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Catholic University of America (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Huaiyu
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
Published
2018-02-27
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
408-419
ISSN
  • 1068-9583 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3572
OpenAlex
W2793074174
Cited by
33
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Emory University Research Council (Group interventions for Suicidal African American men and women)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
shame, depressive symptoms, self-compassion, contingent self-worth, mediation, resilience, suicide attempts, African Americans, family support, divine love, suicidal behavior, self-compassion training
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Black or African American, Depression, Empathy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Poverty, Self Concept, Shame, Suicide, Attempted, Urban Population, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review