Cited by 289Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceElder Abuse and NeglectSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Helpseeking Experiences of Men Who Sustain Intimate Partner Violence: An Overlooked Population and Implications for Practice

Open access
Douglas, Emily M., Hines, Denise A.·2011·Journal of Family Violence

Abstract

For over 30 years, research has shown that men can and do sustain intimate partner violence (IPV) from their female partners. This is the first large-scale, nationally-based, quantitative study to systematically detail the helpseeking experiences of men who have sustained IPV from their female partners. The sample is composed of 302 men who were recruited from resources specializing in men's issues. Results indicate that men who seek help for IPV victimization have the most positive experiences in seeking help from family/friends, and mental health and medical providers. They have the least positive experiences with members of the DV service system. Cumulative positive helpseeking experiences were associated with lower levels of abusing alcohol; cumulative negative experiences were associated with higher rates of exceeding a clinical cut-off for post-traumatic stress disorder. Results are discussed in terms of implications for the social service sector and for future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10896-011-9382-4

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 65 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. First, M. B., Gibbon, M., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (1996). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders, research version, patient edition with psychotic screen (SCID-I/P W/PSY SCREEN). New York: Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute.
  2. Robins, L. N., Helzer, J., Cottler, L., & Goldring, E. (1988). NIMH diagnostic interview schedule, vol. 3. St. Louis: Washington University Press.
  3. Straus, M. A. (1995). Trends in cultural norms and rates of partner violence: an update to 1992. In S. Stith & M. A. Straus (Eds.), Understanding partner violence: Prevalence, causes, consequences, and solutions (pp. 30–33). Minneapolis: National Council on Family Relations.
  4. Sweeney, K. (2007). Restrictions of race, class, and gender norms on ability to attain preferred gender roles. Conference Papers—American Sociological Association, 1.
  5. World Health Organization. (2005). Multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Douglas, E. M., & Hines, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Bridgewater State University (US)
  • Clark University (US)
Corresponding author
Douglas, Emily M.
Venue
Journal of Family Violence
Published
2011-06-04
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
473-485
ISSN
  • 0885-7482 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2851
OpenAlex
W2127675393
Cited by
289
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Family Violence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Journal of international women's studies (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH074590)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
intimate partner violence, male victims, domestic violence services, post-traumatic stress disorder, alcohol abuse, help-seeking barriers, family and friend support, mental health professionals, healthcare workers, men's health services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review