Cited by 129Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesElder Abuse and Neglect

Barriers to Men’s Help Seeking for Intimate Partner Violence

Open access
Taylor, Julie C., Bates, Elizabeth A., Colosi, Attilio, Creer, Andrew J.·2022·Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract

Evidence suggests that male victims of intimate partner violence (IPV) are less likely to seek help for their victimization than female victims. Studies exploring barriers to help seeking are relatively scarce in the United Kingdom (UK) and those that have been undertaken across Europe, United States, Canada, and Australia have tended to rely on small samples of help-seeking men who have self-identified as victims of IPV. With a view to include more male victim voices in the literature, an anonymous qualitative questionnaire was distributed via social media. In total, 147 men (85% from the UK) who self-identified as being subject to abuse from their female partners, completed the questionnaire. The data was subjected to a deductive thematic analysis and one superordinate and two overarching themes were identified. The superordinate theme was stigmatized gender and the two overarching themes (subthemes in parentheses) were barriers prohibiting help seeking (status and credibility, health and well-being) and responses to initial help seeking (discreditation, exclusion/isolation, and helpfulness). The findings are discussed in the context of Overstreet and Quinn’s (2013) interpersonal violence and stigma model and findings from previous research. The conclusions and recommendations promote education and training and advocate a radical change to policy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/08862605211035870

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Male victims are less likely to seek help for their victimization than female victims (female 81%, male 57%).

    “Male victims are less likely to seek help for their victimization than female victims (female 81%, male 57%).”

    From Help‐seeking behavior of male victims of intimate partner violence in Japan (2024) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Analysis section reports that some male participants did not seek help, and the Discussion describes barriers to men’s help seeking. But this study of male victims does not report a male–female comparison or the cited rates of 81% for women and 57% for men (searched both figures and the comparison). (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is no empirical consensus regarding IPV experience prevalence among men, variation in the type of IPV experiences, nor in any differences or unique needs resulting from these experiences.

    “There is no empirical consensus regarding IPV experience prevalence among men, variation in the type of IPV experiences, nor in any differences or unique needs resulting from these experiences (Scott-Storey et al., 2023; Taylor et al., 2022).”

    From Experiences and Impacts of Intimate Partner Violence Against Men in Northern Ireland: Qualitative Findings from the Male Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence Study (2026) · cites this paper as Taylor et al., 2022

    The Early Research section says research on men’s responses to IPV and help-seeking is sparse, and the IPV Policy in the United Kingdom section cautions that existing studies may miss some experiences. Those passages support uncertainty about the range of men’s experiences, but the paper does not establish a lack of empirical consensus about prevalence or about differences and unique needs resulting from IPV. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Under-reporting affects IPV prevalence rates, as many men who have experienced IPV are unaware their experiences meet the definition of abuse.

    “Under-reporting also affects these rates, as many men who have experienced IPV are unaware their experiences meet the definition of abuse (Bates, 2020a, 2020b; Taylor et al., 2022).”

    From Experiences and Impacts of Intimate Partner Violence Against Men in Northern Ireland: Qualitative Findings from the Male Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence Study (2026) · cites this paper as Taylor et al., 2022

    The Analysis reports that some male participants had not disclosed their abuse until years later or until the questionnaire. In “Stigmatized Gender,” one participant says he had not realized men could be victims. These passages support under-disclosure and some lack of recognition, but do not establish that many men fail to recognize their experiences as abuse or measure the effect on IPV prevalence rates. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • IPV against cisgender women and its impacts have been widely researched, but the experiences of men remain understudied.

    “To date, IPV against cisgender women and its impacts have been widely researched, but the experiences of men remain understudied (Scott-Storey et al., 2023; Taylor et al., 2022).”

    From Experiences and Impacts of Intimate Partner Violence Against Men in Northern Ireland: Qualitative Findings from the Male Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence Study (2026) · cites this paper as Taylor et al., 2022

    The Abstract says historical IPV research has focused on men’s perpetration and women’s victimization, and Early Research describes a paucity of research on male victims’ responses and help seeking. The paper does not specify that the women in the earlier research were cisgender, so that qualifier is not supported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.80)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Men are more likely to either not report due to psychosocial and cultural influences, or to not recognise their experiences as IPV.

    “Men are more likely to either not report due to psychosocial and cultural influences, or to not recognise their experiences as IPV (Bates, 2020b; Taylor et al., 2022).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Braun V., & Clarke V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In Cooper H., Camic P. M., Long D. L., Panter A. T., Rindskopf D., & Sher K. J. (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, vol. 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57- 71). American Psychological Association
  2. Buzawa E. S., Buzawa C. G., & Stark E. (2017). Responding to domestic violence: The integration of criminal justice and human services (5th ed.). SAGE.
  3. Felson R. B. (2002). Violence & gender re-examined (Vol. 21). American Psychological Association.
  4. Milligan M. (2019). The response of law enforcement in regards to intimate partner violence on male victims within heterosexual relationships [Doctoral dissertation]. University of West Georgia.
  5. Pence E., & Paymar M. (2003). Creating a process of change for men who batter. An education curriculum (Rev. ed.). Minnesota Program Development.
  6. Wright C. (2016). The absent voice of male domestic abuse victims: The marginalisation of men in a system originally designed for women. Plymouth Law and Criminal Justice Review, 8, 333- 350.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taylor, J. C., Bates, E. A., Colosi, A., & Creer, A. J.
Affiliations
University of Cumbria (GB)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Julie C.
Venue
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2021-08-25
Volume
37
Issue
19-20
Pages
NP18417-NP18444
ISSN
  • 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6518
OpenAlex
W3194102121
Cited by
129
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 8
FWCI
8.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Insight (University of Cumbria) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
Keywords
intimate partner violence, male victims, help-seeking, help-seeking barriers, gender stigma, victim isolation, health and well-being, gender-based violence, United Kingdom
MeSH terms
Intimate Partner Violence, Female, Humans, Male, Men, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Violence, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review