Cited by 26Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyCrime Patterns and Interventions

A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of the Impact of Public Assistance on Prisoner Recidivism

Luallen, Jeremy, Edgerton, Jared, Rabideau, Deirdre·2018·Journal of Quantitative Criminology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10940-017-9353-x

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A policy banning those convicted of a drug felony from receiving food stamp or welfare benefits did not deter return to prison.

    “One study examined a policy which banned those convicted of a drug felony from receiving food stamp or welfare benefits; the ban did not deter return to prison.59”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luallen, J., Edgerton, J., & Rabideau, D.
Corresponding author
Luallen, Jeremy
Venue
Journal of Quantitative Criminology
Published
2017-05-12
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
741-773
ISSN
  • 0748-4518 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7799
OpenAlex
W2612347559
Cited by
26
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Quantitative Criminology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bureau of Justice Statistics (2010-BJ-CX-K067)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
social assistance, welfare benefits, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, drug offenders, prison population, regression discontinuity design, survival analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review