Cited by 13Microplastics and Plastic PollutionEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

Innovative approach for quantitative determination of ingested microplastics by Daphnia magna: use of differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetry

Open access
Procházková, Petra, Kalčíková, Gabriela, Maršálková, Eliška, Zlámalová Gargošová, Helena, Kučerík, Jiří·2025·Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

Abstract

Due to the serious environmental impacts of plastic pollution, some conventional plastics have been replaced with biodegradable alternatives. However, these biodegradable options can also fragment and form microplastics, which can be ingested by and harm various biota. The standard methods for quantifying ingested microplastics involve digestion of the gut or the whole organism using acidic, alkaline, or oxidative processes. However, these aggressive methods may destroy biodegradable microplastics, leading to erroneous results. Therefore, in this study, we employed thermal analysis methods, specifically differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetry (TG), to quantify the ingestion of poly-3-hydroxybutyrate (P3HB), a biodegradable microplastic, by the freshwater crustacean, Daphnia magna. During chronic experiments, we analysed organisms exposed to P3HB with sizes smaller than 125 and 63 μm, at concentrations ranging from 1.56–25 mg L−1. DSC identified an endothermic peak associated with the melting of semicrystalline P3HB, and its enthalpies were utilised to compute the number/mass of P3HB ingested by D. magna. Notably, shifts in melting points suggested that higher concentrations induced particle agglomeration, and these agglomerates could not penetrate deeply into the organism. The TG approach involved subtracting the mass loss between 200 and 400 °C in D. magna specimens exposed to P3HB suspensions from controls without P3HB exposure. Both methods provided comparable data, revealing that, depending on particle size, individual D. magna ingested up to 10% of their body mass. Our findings indicate that both methods effectively detect P3HB (and potentially other plastic fragments), with DSC demonstrating better sensitivity. While the suggested approach did not enable us to calculate the level of determination or quantification, we were able to demonstrate that DSC can detect P3HB in only one specimen of D. magna exposed to the lowest suspension concentration. This indicates that D. magna exposed to the 63 μm fraction ingested approximately 3 μg of P3HB, whereas those exposed to the 125 μm P3HB ingested around 4 μg of P3HB. The introduced methods expand the possibilities for detecting ingested microplastics and probably also nanoplastics, in zooplankton and possibly also other species.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10973-024-12985-0

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sreekumar K, Bindhu B, Veluraja K. Perspectives of polylactic acid from structure to applications. Polym Renew Resour. 2021;12:60–74.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Procházková, P., Kalčíková, G., Maršálková, E., Zlámalová Gargošová, H., & Kučerík, J.
Affiliations
  • Brno University of Technology (CZ)
  • University of Ljubljana (SI)
Corresponding author
Kučerík, Jiří
Venue
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
Published
2024-04-08
Volume
150
Issue
2
Pages
1303-1310
ISSN
  • 1388-6150 (ISSN-L)
  • 1588-2926
OpenAlex
W4394575646
Cited by
13
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Brno University of Technology Digital Library (Brno University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy (FCH-S-23-8297)
  • Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS (P2-0191)
  • European Cooperation in Science and Technology (CA20101)
  • Brno University of Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
microplastic ingestion, Daphnia magna, polyhydroxybutyrate, biodegradable microplastics, differential scanning calorimetry, thermogravimetric analysis, particle agglomeration, particle size effects, plastic pollution, zooplankton, nanoplastics, long-term exposure, heat of fusion, mass loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review