CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 233Evolutionary Game Theory and CooperationPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Strong Reciprocity and the Roots of Human Morality

Open access
Gintis, Herbert, Henrich, Joseph, Bowles, Samuel, Boyd, Robert, Fehr, Ernst·2008·Social Justice Research
DOI 10.1007/s11211-008-0067-y
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11211-008-0067-y

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dawkins, R. (2007). The god illusion. Boston and New York: Houghton-Mifflin Press.
  2. Farkas, S., & Robinson, J. (1996). The values we live by: What Americans want from Welfare Reform. New York: Public Agenda.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 233

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Gintis, H., Henrich, J., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., & Fehr, E.
Affiliations
  • Santa Fe Institute (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Gintis, Herbert
ORCID
Venue
Social Justice Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2008-03-04
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
241-253
ISSN
  • 0885-7466 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6725
DOI
10.1007/s11211-008-0067-y
OpenAlex
W1992748240
Cited by
233
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 15
FWCI
27.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Social Justice Research (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
strong reciprocity, human morality, evolution of morality, altruism, moral behavior, group selection, human nature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review