Cited by 601Cultural Differences and ValuesSocial and Intergroup PsychologySocial Representations and Identity

Beyond the ‘east–west’ dichotomy: Global variation in cultural models of selfhood.

Open access
Vignoles, Vivian L., Owe, Ellinor, Becker, Maja, Smith, Peter B., Easterbrook, Matthew J., Brown, Rupert, González, Roberto, Didier, Nicolas +64 more·2016·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Abstract

Markus and Kitayama's (1991) theory of independent and interdependent self-construals had a major influence on social, personality, and developmental psychology by highlighting the role of culture in psychological processes. However, research has relied excessively on contrasts between North American and East Asian samples, and commonly used self-report measures of independence and interdependence frequently fail to show predicted cultural differences. We revisited the conceptualization and measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals in 2 large-scale multinational surveys, using improved methods for cross-cultural research. We developed (Study 1: N = 2924 students in 16 nations) and validated across cultures (Study 2: N = 7279 adults from 55 cultural groups in 33 nations) a new 7-dimensional model of self-reported ways of being independent or interdependent. Patterns of global variation support some of Markus and Kitayama's predictions, but a simple contrast between independence and interdependence does not adequately capture the diverse models of selfhood that prevail in different world regions. Cultural groups emphasize different ways of being both independent and interdependent, depending on individualism-collectivism, national socioeconomic development, and religious heritage. Our 7-dimensional model will allow future researchers to test more accurately the implications of cultural models of selfhood for psychological processes in diverse ecocultural contexts. (PsycINFO Database Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/xge0000175

Cites

146 of 146 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vignoles, V. L., Owe, E., Becker, M., Smith, P. B., Easterbrook, M. J., Brown, R., González, R., Didier, N., Carrasco, D., Cadena, M. P., Lay, S., Schwartz, S. J., Des Rosiers, S. E., Villamar, J. A., Gavreliuc, A., Zinkeng, M., Kreuzbauer, R., Baguma, P., Martin, M., Tatarko, A., Herman, G., de Sauvage, I., Courtois, M., Garðarsdóttir, R. B., Harb, C., Schweiger Gallo, I., Prieto Gil, P., Lorente Clemares, R., Campara, G., Nizharadze, G., Macapagal, M. E. J., Jalal, B., Bourguignon, D., Zhang, J., Lv, S., Chybicka, A., Yuki, M., Zhang, X., Espinosa, A., Valk, A., Abuhamdeh, S., Amponsah, B., Özgen, E., Güner, E. Ü., Yamakoğlu, N., Chobthamkit, P., Pyszczynski, T., Kesebir, P., Vargas Trujillo, E., Balanta, P., Cendales Ayala, B., Koller, S. H., Jaafar, J. L., Gausel, N., Fischer, R., Milfont, T. L., Kusdil, E., Çağlar, S., Aldhafri, S., Ferreira, M. C., Mekonnen, K. H., Wang, Q., Fülöp, M., Torres, A., Camino, L., Lemos, F. C. S., Fritsche, I., Möller, B., Regalia, C., Manzi, C., Brambilla, M., & Bond, M. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • Laboratoire Cognition, Langues, Langage, Ergonomie (FR)
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • West University of Timişoara (RO)
  • University of Buea (CM)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • Makerere University (UG)
  • University of Namibia (NA)
  • National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
  • UCLouvain (BE)
  • University of Iceland (IS)
  • American University of Beirut (LB)
  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
  • Free University of Tbilisi (GE)
  • Ateneo de Manila University (PH)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Psychologie Ergonomique et Sociale pour l'Expérience Utilisateurs (FR)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • North China University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • University of Gdańsk (PL)
  • Hokkaido University (JP)
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PE)
  • University of Tartu (EE)
  • Istanbul Şehir University (TR)
  • University of Ghana (GH)
  • Yaşar University (TR)
  • Bilkent University (TR)
  • Thammasat University (TH)
  • University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • University of Agder (NO)
  • Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
  • Ankara University (TR)
  • Sultan Qaboos University (OM)
  • Universidade Salgado de Oliveira (BR)
  • Addis Ababa University (ET)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology (HU)
  • Universidade Federal da Paraíba (BR)
  • Universidade Federal do Pará (BR)
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Published
2016-08
Volume
145
Issue
8
Pages
966-1000
ISSN
  • 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2222
OpenAlex
W2474075425
Cited by
601
References
146
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 3
FWCI
51.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion)
  • Docta Complutense (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) (submittedVersion)
  • Bursa Uludag University - AVESIS (submittedVersion)
  • Bilkent University Institutional Repository (Bilkent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Istanbul Şehir University Institutional Repository (Istanbul Şehir University) (submittedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Economic and Social Research Council (RES-062-23-1300, ES/G015074/1)
  • Interdisciplinary Center for Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies (FONDAP/15130009)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
Keywords
independent self-construal, interdependent self-construal, self-construal, cross-cultural measurement, individualism-collectivism, religious heritage, self-report scale
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Culture, Female, Humans, Individuality, Male, Personality, Self Concept, Students, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review