The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anti-luck epistemology
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To say that a belief is safe is to say that the belief couldn't easily have been false .”
From The Epistemic Cost of Opacity: How the Use of Artificial Intelligence Undermines the Knowledge of Medical Doctors in High-Stakes Contexts (2025) · cites this paper as Pritchard, 2007
Citations
Cites
(2000) · Cited by 5,055
Williamson, T. L. (2002) · doi:10.1093/019925656x.001.0001 · Cited by 2,788
American Philosophical Quarterly
(2024) · American Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.5406/21521123.61.4.08 · Cited by 2,341
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Wittgenstein, L. (1969) · Cited by 2,146
Goldman, A. I., & Nozick, R. (1983) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184523 · Cited by 2,056
Plantinga, A. (1993) · doi:10.1093/0195078640.001.0001 · Cited by 1,703
Lewis, D. (1996) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048409612347521 · Cited by 1,450
Hawthorne, J. (2003) · doi:10.1093/0199269556.001.0001 · Cited by 1,333
SMITH, D. P. (2005) · Philosophical Books · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0149.2005.0360c.x · Cited by 1,295
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Harman G. (1973). Thought. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 408
Alspector‐Kelly, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108604093.012
Transmission, Skepticism, and Conditions of Warrant
Alspector‐Kelly, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108604093.005
Alspector‐Kelly, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108604093.008
Safety, Evidence, and Epistemic Luck
Shaffer, M. J. (2022) · Acta Analytica · doi:10.1007/s12136-022-00511-6
Alspector‐Kelly, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108604093.013
Chudnoff, E. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198863021.003.0009
Knowledge-how and cognitive achievement
(2018) · Bloomsbury Methuen Drama eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781474218849.0007
Kelp, C., & Greco, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108666404.012
Chudnoff, E. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198863021.003.0001
Chudnoff, E. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198863021.003.0005
Luzzi, F. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108649278.008
The Gettier Problem’s Explicability Problem
Hetherington, S. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316827413.015
The Gettier Problem and Externalism
Borges, R. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316827413.006
Hetherington, S. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316827413.001
Hetherington, S. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316827413.016
Hetherington, S. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316827413.017
Intuition in the Gettier Problem
Chudnoff, E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316827413.013
Kelly, T. J. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192842954.003.0003
Kelly, T. J. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192842954.003.0007
Kelly, T. J. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192842954.003.0012
The Bias Blind Spot and the Biases of Introspection
Kelly, T. A. F. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192842954.003.0005
(2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192842954.002.0003
Knowledge, Skepticism, and Reliability
Kelly, T. J. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192842954.003.0010
(2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192842954.002.0004
Kelly, T. J. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192842954.003.0009
Bias Attributions and the Epistemology of Disagreement
Kelly, T. J. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192842954.003.0011
Symmetry and Bias Attributions
Kelly, T. A. F. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192842954.003.0008
The Norm-Theoretic Account of Bias
Kelly, T. J. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192842954.003.0004
Kelly, T. J. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192842954.003.0006
Sensitivity, Safety, and Brains in Vats
Zhao, H. (2023) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-022-09845-7
Whiting, D. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192893956.002.0003
Pinillos, N. Á. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198871965.003.0008
Pinillos, N. Á. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198871965.003.0012
Pinillos, N. Á. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198871965.003.0006
Pinillos, N. Á. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198871965.003.0013
Philosophically Accommodating Accounts
Pinillos, N. Á. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198871965.003.0011
Pinillos, N. Á. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198871965.003.0003
Pinillos, N. Á. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198871965.003.0010
Pinillos, N. Á. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198871965.003.0009
Pinillos, N. Á. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198871965.003.0002
Pinillos, N. Á. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198871965.002.0007
Pinillos, N. Á. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198871965.003.0001
Pinillos, N. Á. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198871965.003.0004
Pinillos, N. Á. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198871965.002.0005
Pinillos, N. Á. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198871965.002.0004
Pinillos, N. Á. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198871965.003.0005
Pinillos, N. Á. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198871965.002.0003
Pinillos, N. Á. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198871965.003.0007
Deliberative Trust and Convictively Apt Trust
Carter, J. A. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191982460.003.0005
Carter, J. A. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191982460.003.0008
Trust, Pistology, and the Ethics of Cooperation
Carter, J. A. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191982460.003.0004
Carter, J. A. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191982460.003.0002
Trust, Vulnerability, and Monitoring
Carter, J. A. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191982460.003.0007
Carter, J. A. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191982460.003.0003
Carter, J. A. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191982460.003.0006
Conclusions and a Research Agenda
Carter, J. A. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191982460.003.0010
Carter, J. A. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191982460.003.0001
Carter, J. A. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191982460.002.0005
Carter, J. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192846921.002.0003
Carter, J. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192846921.002.0004
Carter, J. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192846921.002.0005
Chudnoff, E. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198863021.002.0003
Chudnoff, E. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198863021.002.0004
Chudnoff, E. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198863021.002.0007
Chudnoff, E. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198863021.002.0006
Epistemically Vicious Knowledge
Paulson, S. (2024) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-024-00855-y
Self-Knowledge of Belief Requires Understanding of Propositions
Schwengerer, L. (2024) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-024-00917-1
Luck and normative achievements: Let not safety be our guide
Guindon, B. (2025) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2024.35
Is the Unity of Normativity Safe?
Whiting, D. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780198927761.003.0004
Queloz, M. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198926283.003.0009
Queloz, M. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198926283.003.0002
Confidence, Reflection, and Knowledge
Queloz, M. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198926283.003.0004
Queloz, M. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198926283.003.0006
Queloz, M. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198926283.003.0008
Introduction: Appraising Concepts
Queloz, M. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198926283.003.0001
Queloz, M. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198926283.003.0003
Conclusion: Tailoring Thought to Need
Queloz, M. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198926283.003.0012
The Politics of Conflicting Concerns
Queloz, M. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198926283.003.0011
Queloz, M. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198926283.003.0007
Queloz, M. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198926283.003.0005
Alves, E., Fett, J. R. V., & Posselt, V. F. (2025) · Veritas (Porto Alegre) · doi:10.15448/1984-6746.2025.1.46598
The Recovery Problem’s Threat to Consent Testimony
Suda, Y. (2023) · Disputatio · doi:10.2478/disp-2023-0016
Dunne, G. (2025) · Future in Educational Research · doi:10.1002/fer3.70010
Smith, N. D. (2025) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-96041-3_4
Topey, B. (2025) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-98717-5_9
Justification does not aggregate: de-generalizing the lottery paradox
Ochoa, A. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-05342-7
Carter, J. A., & Kallestrup, J. (2026) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.70041
Lord, E. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780191988264.001.0001
Talk about luck! On the role of knowledge in communication
Simpson, V. (2026) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05499-9
The authority and politics of epiphanic experience
Queloz, M. (2026) · Zeitschrift für Ethik und Moralphilosophie · doi:10.1007/s42048-026-00250-y
Bourdoncle, R. (2022) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/a94996a0zb442z4caaz9ad1z238cd31618b2
Lottery, Neural Phase and Safety
Zhao, B. (2026) · Theoria · doi:10.1111/theo.70088
Epistemic Risk of the Quantitative Risk: Meta Level Decision Making in QRMPreprint
Assa, H. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6724924
A liberal view of consciousness and cognition
Pelczar, M. W. (2026) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05638-2
The Safety Versus Sensitivity Debate Revisited
Pritchard, D. (2026) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies11040122
Self-citationThe Epistemic Illusion of Large Language ModelsPreprint
Vannacci, A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6608420
Self‐attributing religious knowledge
Munro, D. (2026) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.70033
Hirvelä, J. (2026) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/fzag038
Metadata
- Authors
- Pritchard, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Stirling (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Pritchard, Duncan
- ORCID
- Pritchard, Duncan
- Venue
- Synthese
- Published
- 2006-10-10
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 277-297
- ISSN
- 0039-7857 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0964
- OpenAlex
- W2092707543
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 47.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Synthese (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/D500494/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic luck
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review