Cited by 13Plant tissue culture and regenerationPlant Genetic and Mutation StudiesPlant Molecular Biology Research

Genomic Alterations in Coding Region of Tissue Culture Plants of Coffea arabica Obtained through Somatic Embryogenesis Revealed by Molecular Markers

Bychappa, Muniswamy, Mishra, Manoj Kumar, Jingade, Pavankumar, Huded, Arun K. C.·2019·Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11240-019-01666-8

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bychappa, M., Mishra, M. K., Jingade, P., & Huded, A. K. C.
Corresponding author
Mishra, Manoj Kumar
Venue
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC)
Published
2019-08-08
Volume
139
Issue
1
Pages
91-103
ISSN
  • 0167-6857 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5044
OpenAlex
W2967776223
Cited by
13
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
Keywords
Coffea arabica, somatic embryogenesis, in vitro regeneration, somaclonal variation, genetic fidelity, SRAP markers, SCoT markers, 2,4-D, callus induction, zinc finger proteins, micropropagation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review