Cited by 17Telomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsCell Image Analysis Techniques

A Fully-Automated Senescence Test (FAST) for the high-throughput quantification of senescence-associated markers

Open access
Neri, Francesco, Takajjart, Selma N., Lerner, Chad A., Desprez, Pierre-Yves, Schilling, Birgit, Campisi, Judith, Gerencser, Akos A.·2024·GeroScience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Cellular senescence is a major driver of aging and age-related diseases. Quantification of senescent cells remains challenging due to the lack of senescence-specific markers and generalist, unbiased methodology. Here, we describe the Fully-Automated Senescence Test (FAST), an image-based method for the high-throughput, single-cell assessment of senescence in cultured cells. FAST quantifies three of the most widely adopted senescence-associated markers for each cell imaged: senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity (SA-β-Gal) using X-Gal, proliferation arrest via lack of 5-ethynyl-2’-deoxyuridine (EdU) incorporation, and enlarged morphology via increased nuclear area. The presented workflow entails microplate image acquisition, image processing, data analysis, and graphing. Standardization was achieved by i) quantifying colorimetric SA-β-Gal via optical density; ii) implementing staining background controls; iii) automating image acquisition, image processing, and data analysis. In addition to the automated threshold-based scoring, a multivariate machine learning approach is provided. We show that FAST accurately quantifies senescence burden and is agnostic to cell type and microscope setup. Moreover, it effectively mitigates false-positive senescence marker staining, a common issue arising from culturing conditions. Using FAST, we compared X-Gal with fluorescent C 12 FDG live-cell SA-β-Gal staining on the single-cell level. We observed only a modest correlation between the two, indicating that those stains are not trivially interchangeable. Finally, we provide proof of concept that our method is suitable for screening compounds that modify senescence burden. This method will be broadly useful to the aging field by enabling rapid, unbiased, and user-friendly quantification of senescence burden in culture, as well as facilitating large-scale experiments that were previously impractical.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11357-024-01167-3

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The model of senescence induction using ionizing radiation has been well established and proven to yield highly robust senescence induction.

    “In general, this model of senescence induction using ionizing radiation (IR), has been well established and has proven to yield highly robust senescence induction as demonstrated in the Campisi lab [10, 20, 21] and many other labs.”

    From Senescent cell heterogeneity and responses to senolytic treatment are related to cell cycle status during senescence induction (2025) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Methods (Senescence induction; page unavailable) describe a previously reported ionizing-radiation protocol, and the Results (Automation of the senescence marker scoring; page unavailable) report significant differences in senescence markers between irradiated and control cells. These passages support the use and effectiveness of the model in this study, but do not establish that induction is highly robust across the Campisi lab and many other labs. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neri, F., Takajjart, S. N., Lerner, C. A., Desprez, P.-Y., Schilling, B., Campisi, J., & Gerencser, A. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Buck Institute for Research on Aging (US)
Corresponding author
  • Schilling, Birgit
  • Gerencser, Akos A.
Venue
GeroScience
Published
2024-06-13
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
4185-4202
ISSN
  • 2152-4041 (ISSN-L)
  • 2509-2723
OpenAlex
W4399644314
Cited by
17
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3
FWCI
4.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • GeroScience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (RF1AG068908, U01AG060906, P01AG017242, P01AG066591, U54AG075932)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Keywords
cellular senescence, senescence-associated β-galactosidase, EdU incorporation, nuclear area, X-gal staining, aging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review