Cited by 972Telomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Unmasking Transcriptional Heterogeneity in Senescent Cells

Open access
Hernandez-Segura, Alejandra, de Jong, Tristan V., Melov, Simon, Guryev, Victor, Campisi, Judith, Demaria, Marco·2017·Current Biology

Abstract

Cellular senescence is a state of irreversibly arrested proliferation, often induced by genotoxic stress [1]. Senescent cells participate in a variety of physiological and pathological conditions, including tumor suppression [2], embryonic development [3, 4], tissue repair [5-8], and organismal aging [9]. The senescence program is variably characterized by several non-exclusive markers, including constitutive DNA damage response (DDR) signaling, senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-βgal) activity, increased expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors p16INK4A (CDKN2A) and p21CIP1 (CDKN1A), increased secretion of many bio-active factors (the senescence-associated secretory phenotype, or SASP), and reduced expression of the nuclear lamina protein LaminB1 (LMNB1) [1]. Many senescence-associated markers result from altered transcription, but the senescent phenotype is variable, and methods for clearly identifying senescent cells are lacking [10]. Here, we characterize the heterogeneity of the senescence program using numerous whole-transcriptome datasets generated by us or publicly available. We identify transcriptome signatures associated with specific senescence-inducing stresses or senescent cell types and identify and validate genes that are commonly differentially regulated. We also show that the senescent phenotype is dynamic, changing at varying intervals after senescence induction. Identifying novel transcriptome signatures to detect any type of senescent cell or to discriminate among diverse senescence programs is an attractive strategy for determining the diverse biological roles of senescent cells and developing specific drug targets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2017.07.033

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

17 of 23 cited sources checked · 9 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingcitation

    Altered GO pathways in senescent cells included chromatin organization, DNA repair, membrane trafficking, and NF-kappaB activation.

    “Among the main gene ontology (GO) pathways [19, 20] showing altered in senescent cells, “chromatin organization,” “DNA repair,” “membrane trafficking,” and “activation of NF-kappaB” were notable for their known links to senescence and aging (Figure 1C) (Figure 1C) [1, 10, 21, 22].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [19] Kamburov, 2009, ConsensusPathDB--a database for integrating human functional interaction networks, Nucleic Acids Res. source

      The Results (Web interface; page unavailable) describe a tool for pathway over-representation analysis, not an analysis of senescent cells. Searches for senescence and the named pathways found no passage in our copy reporting that chromatin organization, DNA repair, membrane trafficking, or NF-kappaB activation was altered in senescent cells. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [20] Kamburov, 2011, ConsensusPathDB: toward a more complete picture of cell biology, Nucleic Acids Res. source

      The 'Use case: functional network-based analysis of gene expression data' section describes Gene Ontology findings from a comparison of primary and metastatic prostate cancer, not senescent cells. Searches for senescence, membrane trafficking, and NF-kappaB found no passage reporting the four claimed altered pathways in senescent cells. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingcitation

    The core signature includes BCL2L2, PATZ1, and SMO, genes previously linked to senescence.

    “Nevertheless, within the senescence core signature, we found genes that had been previously linked to senescence: BCL2L2 (also known as Bcl-w), a negative regulator of apoptosis [26]; PATZ1, a transcriptional repressor whose expression inhibits senescence in endothelial cells [27]; SMO, a component of the Hedgehog pathway [28]; and CCND1, a regulatory subunit of CDK4 or CDK6, whose activity is req”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [26] Yosef, 2016, Directed elimination of senescent cells by inhibition of BCL-W and BCL-XL, Nat. Commun. source
    • cites [27] Cho, 2012, POZ/BTB and AT-hook-containing zinc finger protein 1 (PATZ1) inhibits endothelial cell senescence through a p53 dependent pathway, Cell Death Differ. source
    • cites [28] Breslin, 2014, Ciliary abnormalities in senescent human fibroblasts impair proliferative capacity, Cell Cycle source
  • Interpretationown data

    Even in whole tissues with a small senescent cell fraction (1-3%), some core signature genes can be identified as differentially regulated.

    “These findings suggest that even in whole tissues where the number of senescent cells is small (most aged or diseased tissues contained 1%–3% senescent cells [33]), some of the genes of our core signature can be identified as differentially regulated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [33] Childs, 2015, Cellular senescence in aging and age-related disease: from mechanisms to therapy, Nat. Med. source

      The citation is attached to the parenthetical claim about the proportion of senescent cells, not to the citing authors’ finding about core-signature genes. The source’s “Senescence in normal aging” section (page unavailable) describes senescent cells as rare in aged tissues, but our copy does not give the claimed 1%–3% figure for most aged or diseased tissues. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingcitation

    Ten core signature genes (DGKA, GBE1, GDNF, KCTD3, MEIS1, PDLIM4, RAI4, SPIN4, TAF13, and TRDMT1) were also differentially regulated in lung tissue from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients (adjusted p ≤ 0.01).

    “Strikingly, ten genes in our core signature (DGKA, GBE1, GDNF, KCTD3, MEIS1, PDLIM4, RAI4, SPIN4, TAF13, and TRDMT1) were also present in this dataset (adjusted p ≤ 0.01; data not shown).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [32] Schafer, 2017, Cellular senescence mediates fibrotic pulmonary disease, Nat. Commun. source
  • Premisecitation

    One study [14] showed that p16INK4A mRNA levels are not always significantly changed in senescence in some fibroblast strains.

    “Indeed, one of the studies used here [14] showed that p16INK4A mRNA levels are not always significantly changed in senescence in some fibroblast strains.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] Marthandan, 2016, Conserved senescence associated genes and pathways in primary human fibroblasts detected by RNA-seq, PLoS ONE source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 14
  • May combine two claims. 23
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    SASP component upregulation depends on the type of cell.

    “For example, upregulation of various components of the SASP has been reported to be dependent on the type of cell [24].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24] Coppé, 2008, Senescence-associated secretory phenotypes reveal cell-nonautonomous functions of oncogenic RAS and the p53 tumor suppressor, PLoS Biol. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    This SASP variability highlights the importance of time and cellular identity in determining the SASP and reflects the complexity of its regulation and biological functions.

    “This variability highlights the importance of time and cellular identity in determining the SASP and reflects the complexity of its regulation and biological functions [1].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] Loaiza, 2016, Cellular senescence and tumor promotion: is aging the key?, Biochim. Biophys. Acta source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    One RS IMR90 sample clustered differently from its replicates and was removed from further analysis.

    “Nonetheless, one sample within one of the datasets (RS IMR90 [14]) clustered differently from its replicates. The aberrant clustering of this sample was reported in the original study, and this sample was then removed from further analysis (Figure S1A).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] Marthandan, 2016, Conserved senescence associated genes and pathways in primary human fibroblasts detected by RNA-seq, PLoS ONE source
      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The senescence phenotype, including the transcriptome, is highly dynamic and not all common senescence markers appear or persist simultaneously.

    “The senescence phenotype, including the transcriptome, is highly dynamic, and not all the common senescence markers appear or persist simultaneously [34, 35].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [34] Kim, 2013, Implications of time-series gene expression profiles of replicative senescence, Aging Cell source
    • cites [35] Schäuble, 2012, Quantitative model of cell cycle arrest and cellular senescence in primary human fibroblasts, PLoS ONE source

      The Results (Model Application to Differently Stressed Cells; page not provided) show that senescence markers appear at different times in BJ fibroblasts and that those cells do not form SAHF, supporting the point that common markers need not appear simultaneously. The paper does not establish that the transcriptome is highly dynamic or that markers cease to persist after appearing. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    p16INK4A is often induced late after senescence induction.

    “However, it is possible that samples collected to perform the RNA-seq experiments might have been in a pre-p16INK4A engagement phase, as p16INK4A is often induced late after senescence induction [39].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] Stein, 1999, Differential roles for cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p21 and p16 in the mechanisms of senescence and differentiation in human fibroblasts, Mol. Cell. Biol. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A subset of core signature genes was validated in primary human HCA-2 fibroblasts and confirmed differentially expressed compared to proliferating and quiescent cells.

    “We also validated a subset of these genes in primary human HCA-2 fibroblasts and confirmed differential expression compared to that in proliferating and quiescent cells (Figures S4B and S4C).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The second and third principal components separated cells according to senescence status, with some influence from study/dataset origin.

    “However, the second and third principal components separated the cells according to senescence status, with some influence from the study/dataset of origin (Figure S1A).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    p21CIP1 was among genes differentially expressed by all senescent cell types and in response to all stimuli, although it was also slightly upregulated in quiescence.

    “By contrast, p21CIP1 was among the genes differentially expressed by all senescent cell types and in response to all stimuli, although it was also slightly upregulated in quiescence, concordant with its known involvement in both types of cell-cycle arrest [40].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] Terzi, 2016, The cell fate: senescence or quiescence, Mol. Biol. Rep. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the fibroblast senescence signature, genes related to transcription and RNA synthesis were downregulated, while vesicle transport genes were upregulated.

    “Within the senescence-associated signature of fibroblasts, multiple genes related to transcription and RNA synthesis were downregulated, while genes involved in vesicle transport were upregulated (Figure 1B).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    LMNB1 was strongly downregulated in all cell types except melanocytes, but was also somewhat downregulated at quiescence.

    “LMNB1 was strongly downregulated in all cell types, with the exception of melanocytes, but was also somewhat downregulated at quiescence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    PLK3 was no longer differentially expressed 24 hr or 14 days after radiation or at any time in a radioresistant lymphoblast line.

    “Importantly, this gene was no longer differentially expressed 24 hr or 14 days after the radiation or at any time after radiation in a radioresistant lymphoblast line (data not shown).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    61 genes were shared among all cell types and time points after ionizing radiation, and 34 of these were not shared with quiescent cells.

    “We identified 61 genes that were shared among all cell types and time points, 34 of which were not shared with quiescent cells (Figure S4A; Data S3D).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    1,699 genes were associated with RS, 2,365 with OIS, and 647 with IRIS.

    “A number of genes were associated with a specific senescence-inducing stimulus: 1,699 genes with RS, 2,365 genes with OIS, and 647 genes with IRIS (Figures 1A and S1C; Data S1B–S1D).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All 55 core signature genes were differentially expressed at day 10 for melanocytes and keratinocytes, while other time points showed high variability.

    “While we found differential expression of all the genes at day 10 for melanocytes and keratinocytes, other time points showed high variability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Most core signature genes had moderate fold change, but 26 changed greater than 1.3-fold in all cell types.

    “Of note, most of the genes had a moderate fold change, yet 26 of them changed greater than 1.3-fold in all cell types.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the core signature, downregulated genes were associated with DNA binding or transcription regulation, while upregulated genes were mainly related to DNA damage checkpoints and mitosis.

    “In terms of GO and pathway analysis, some of the downregulated genes were associated with DNA binding or regulation of transcription, while upregulated genes were mainly related to DNA damage checkpoints and mitosis (Figures 2C and 2D).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    RNA quality was measured and RIN was 8 or greater.

    “The extracted RNA was quantitated using a NanoDrop (higher than 1 μg) and RNA quality was measured via BioAnalyzer chip (Agilent) (RIN of 8 or greater).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The stimulus-specific signature might be influenced by having more than one dataset only for RS.

    “Of note, the stimulus-specific signature might be influenced by the fact that more than one dataset was available only for RS.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Randomization and blinding of most experiments were not possible.

    “Randomization and blinding of most experiments were not possible, but otherwise described.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Genes similarly regulated in quiescence and senescence were removed to avoid identifying genes associated with growth arrest rather than senescence.

    “To ensure the identification of genes associated with senescence, and not growth arrest per se, we analyzed quiescent (HCA2) fibroblasts and removed from subsequent analysis those genes similarly regulated in both quiescence and each of the senescence conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Quiescent cells provide a valid control for growth arrest per se.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    SA-βgal counting was performed blind.

    “Every biological replicate was stained in duplicate, and counting was made in blind.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    In a few cases, individual gene differential expression was not statistically significant, suggesting that a combination of core gene expression levels might be a stronger predictor of senescence.

    “In a few cases, the differential expression of individual genes was not statistically significant, suggesting that a combination of the expression level of senescence core genes might be a much stronger predictor of senescence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The heterogeneity of senescent cells in culture is clear, and challenges may be amplified in vivo.

    “However, our data clearly highlight the heterogeneity of senescent cells in culture, anticipating that these challenges might be amplified in vivo, where less is known about the stimuli and cell types associated with senescence.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The senescence phenotype varies between cells, and no method currently identifies senescent cells with certainty.

    “the senescent phenotype is variable, and methods for clearly identifying senescent cells are lacking [10].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] Sharpless, 2015, Forging a signature of in vivo senescence, Nat. Rev. Cancer source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    For RS, three meta-analysis methods were used, and only genes differentially expressed by all three at nominal p ≤ 0.01 were retained.

    “We set a stringent threshold of nominal p ≤ 0.01 to reduce the odds of false-positive results and retained only those genes that were differentially expressed by the three different methods.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Known senescence markers CDKN2A, CDKN1A, and LMNB1 were not within the core signature, supporting that known markers lack universality for different cell types and inducers.

    “It is noteworthy that the common senescence markers, CDKN2A, CDKN1A, and LMNB1, were not within the core signature, supporting the idea that known senescence markers lack universality for different cell types and inducers of senescence [10].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] Sharpless, 2015, Forging a signature of in vivo senescence, Nat. Rev. Cancer source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    RNA-seq used 6 biological replicates per condition.

    “Cells (6 biological replicates per condition) were prepared for RNA extraction via an RNAeasy mini kit (QIAGEN).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Core transcriptome signatures can help identify senescent cells and discriminate among different senescence programs.

    “These signatures can help identify senescent cells and discriminate among different senescence programs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    qPCR samples were run with a technical replicate and in 2-3 biological replicates.

    “All samples were run with a technical replicate and in 2–3 biological replicates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    SA-βgal and EdU samples were done in triplicates and at least 100 cells were counted per replicate in blind.

    “In all cases, both for SA-βgal assay and for EdU staining, samples were done in triplicates and at least 100 cells were counted in each replicate (in blind) and corresponding barplots were generated, where error bars represent the Standard Error of the Mean (SEM).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Low quality reads (average quality < 20) were discarded.

    “Quality control of all samples, including our own, was performed using the FastQC software v0.11.5 and the low quality reads (Average Quality: < 20) were discarded.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    EdU counting was performed blind.

    “Every biological replicate was stained in duplicate, and counting was made in blind.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
32 of 32
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many senescence-associated markers arise from altered transcription.

    “Many senescence-associated markers result from altered transcription, but the senescent phenotype is variable, and methods for clearly identifying senescent cells are lacking [10].”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    SA-βgal activity and growth arrest are valid indicators of senescence status.

    “senescence status was confirmed by SA-βgal activity and growth arrest (Figure S2A).”
    “Senescence status was confirmed by SA-βgal activity (Figure S3A), lack of 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) incorporation (Figure S3B), and increased expression of p16INK4a and p21CIP1 (for RS cells; Figure S3C).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Quiescent cells provide a valid control for growth arrest per se.

    “To ensure the identification of genes associated with senescence, and not growth arrest per se, we analyzed quiescent (HCA2) fibroblasts and removed from subsequent analysis those genes similarly regulated in both quiescence and each of the senescence conditions.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SASP factors, senescence markers, and markers of other aging processes such as α-Klotho can be assayed in body fluids including urine, saliva, blood, and cerebrospinal fluid.

    “SASP factors, senescence markers and markers of other fundamental aging processes (for example, α-Klotho) can be assayed in body fluids such as urine, saliva, blood or cerebrospinal fluid7,19,48,59,61,64,132,133.”

    From Cellular senescence and senolytics: the path to the clinic (2022) · cites this paper as [132]

    The Results and Discussion (page unavailable) discuss SASP factors and senescence markers, including genes used to identify senescent cells. They do not establish that these markers can be assayed in urine, saliva, blood, or cerebrospinal fluid, and the passages found do not address α-Klotho (searched: body fluids and α-Klotho). (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Senescent phenotypes are heterogeneous, varying with cell type, inducing stimulus, microenvironment, and time since induction, and distinct transcriptomic and proteomic profiles have been reported across models.

    “Senescent phenotypes vary depending on the cell type, senescence-inducing stimulus, microenvironment, and time since senescence induction, with distinct transcriptomic and proteomic profiles reported across models.9–11”

    From SenCat: Cataloging human cell senescence through multi-omic profiling of multiple senescent primary cell types (2026) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Results and Discussion report distinct transcriptomic signatures by cell type and inducing stimulus, as well as changes over time after induction. They also note variability associated with laboratory culture conditions, but do not establish microenvironment-dependent phenotypes more broadly. This paper analyzes transcriptomes; it does not report distinct proteomic profiles across models. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Induction of senescence is a tumor suppressor mechanism and a side effect of several chemotherapeutic drugs.

    “Induction of senescence is a tumor suppressor mechanism143–145 and a side effect of several chemotherapeutic drugs that induce a phenotype that might be considered an acquired premature progeroid syndrome in both normal and cancer cells146.”

    From Guidelines for minimal information on cellular senescence experimentation in vivo (2024) · cites this paper as [146]

    The Results and Discussion (page unavailable) describe doxorubicin as a chemotherapeutic agent known to cause senescence and report using it to induce senescence in primary fibroblasts. The paper does not establish the claim about several chemotherapeutic drugs or a premature progeroid phenotype in both normal and cancer cells. Its abstract also links senescence to tumor suppression, although that clause has separate citations in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • p16 INK4A is not expressed by all senescent cells.

    “Even p16 INK4A , which is considered more specific to senescence, is expressed in certain non-senescent cells (Sharpless and Sherr, 2015) and is not expressed by all senescent cells (Hernandez-Segura et al., 2017).”

    From Cellular Senescence: Defining a Path Forward (2019) · cites this paper as Hernandez-Segura et al., 2017

    The Results and Discussion say that CDKN2A (p16INK4A) is not part of the core senescence signature and that p16INK4A mRNA does not always change significantly in senescent fibroblast strains. This supports the point that p16INK4A is not a universal senescence marker, but bulk mRNA comparisons do not establish that some individual senescent cells do not express it. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Senescent cells and their SASP exhibit variability contingent upon specific physiological context, stress, cell type, and tissue.

    “Adding to this complexity, senescent cells and their SASP exhibit variability contingent upon the specific physiological context, stress, cell type, and tissue under investigation (Hernandez-Segura et al, 2017).”

    From Distinct senotypes in p16- and p21-positive cells across human and mouse aging tissues (2025) · cites this paper as Hernandez-Segura et al, 2017

    The Results and Discussion report senescence signatures that vary by inducing stress and cell type, and genes encoding SASP factors that vary by cell type and time after induction. They also report variation associated with fibroblast tissue of origin, but do not establish tissue-dependent SASP variation or test variability across physiological contexts. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Biological replicate counts conflict

    Major

    The sample-preparation section states that each condition had three biological replicates, while the RNA-seq section states that each condition had six. Neither statement qualifies the count to reconcile the two.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hernandez-Segura, A., de Jong, T. V., Melov, S., Guryev, V., Campisi, J., & Demaria, M.
Affiliations
  • Buck Institute for Research on Aging (US)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Demaria, Marco
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
27
Issue
17
Pages
2652-2660.e4
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2749511637
Cited by
972
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 105 · 2025: 122 · 2024: 141 · 2023: 122 · 2022: 134 · 2021: 129 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
27.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
cellular senescence, transcriptional heterogeneity, transcriptome signature, senescence-associated secretory phenotype, senescence-associated β-galactosidase, DNA damage response, p16INK4a, p21
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Humans, Cellular Senescence, Rats, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review