Cited by 329COVID-19 and Mental HealthResilience and Mental HealthHealth disparities and outcomes

Resilience during uncertainty? Greater social connectedness during COVID‐19 lockdown is associated with reduced distress and fatigue

Open access
Nitschke, Jonas P., Forbes, Paul A. G., Ali, Nida, Cutler, Jo, Apps, Matthew A. J., Lockwood, Patricia L., Lamm, Claus·2021·British Journal of Health Psychology

Abstract

Background: Social connections are crucial for our health and well‐being. This is especially true during times of high uncertainty and distress, such as during the COVID‐19 lockdown. This period was characterized by unprecedented physical distancing (often communicated as social distancing) measures resulting in significant changes to people’s usual social lives. Given the potential effects of this disruption on people’s well‐being, it is crucial to identify factors which are associated with negative health outcomes, and conversely, those that promote resilience during times of adversity. Aims: We examined the relationship between individuals’ levels of social connectedness during lockdown and self‐reported stress, worry, and fatigue. Method: Survey data were collected from 981 individuals in a representative sample of Austrian citizens. Data collection occurred during the last week of a six‐week nationwide lockdown due to the COVID‐19 pandemic. The final sample consisted of 902 participants. Participants were asked to complete validated questionnaires to assess levels of social connectedness as well as measures of perceived stress, worry—both general and COVID‐19 specific—and symptoms of fatigue during the previous two weeks. Results: Our results demonstrate that greater social connectedness during the lockdown period was associated with lower levels of perceived stress, as well as general and COVID‐19‐specific worries. Furthermore, we found a negative relationship between fatigue and social connectedness, which was mediated by feelings of stress, general worries, and COVID‐19‐specific worries—respectively, indicating that individuals with smaller network sizes, who were highly distressed during the pandemic, were also likely to report feeling more fatigued. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the important role that social connections play in promoting resilience by buffering against negative physical and mental health outcomes, particularly in times of adversity in times of adversity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjhp.12485

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social connections play an important role in promoting resilience by buffering against negative physical and mental health outcomes.

    “demonstrating that social connections play an important role in promoting resilience by buffering against negative physical and mental health outcomes (Nitschke, et al., 2021).”
  • A recent study showed that greater social connectedness during lockdown was associated with lower levels of perceived stress, lower COVID-19 related worries and feeling less fatigued.

    “a recent study showed that greater social connectedness during lockdown was associated with lower levels of perceived stress, lower COVID‐19 related worries and feeling less fatigued”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Afari, N., & Buchwald, D. (2003). Chronic fatigue syndrome: a review. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 221– 236. 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.2.221 12562565 · DOI
  2. Ashida, S., & Heaney, C.A. (2008). Differential associations of social support and social connectedness with structural features of social networks and the health status of older adults. Journal of Aging and Health, 20, 872– 893. 10.1177/0898264308324626 18815414 · DOI
  3. Burke, R.J., Greenglass, E.R., & Schwarzer, R. (1996). Predicting teacher burnout over time: Effects of work stress, social support, and self‐doubts on burnout and its consequences. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 9, 261– 275. 10.1080/10615809608249406 · DOI
  4. Butler, L.D., Koopman, C., Azarow, J., Blasey, C.M., Magdalene, J.C., DiMiceli, S., … Spiegel, D. (2009). Psychosocial predictors of resilience after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 197, 266– 273. 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31819d9334 19363383 · DOI
  5. Bzdok, D., & Dunbar, R.I.M. (2020). The neurobiology of social distance. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24, 717– 733. 10.1016/j.tics.2020.05.016 32561254 PMC7266757 · DOI
  6. Cella, M., & Chalder, T. (2010). Measuring fatigue in clinical and community settings. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 69(1), 17– 22. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.10.007 20630259 · DOI
  7. Cho, J.‐ H.‐J., Olmstead, R., Choi, H., Carrillo, C., Seeman, T.E., & Irwin, M.R. (2019). Associations of objective versus subjective social isolation with sleep disturbance, depression, and fatigue in community‐dwelling older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 23(9), 1130– 1138. 10.1080/13607863.2018.1481928 30284454 PMC6447478 · DOI
  8. Christiansen, J., Larsen, F.B., & Lasgaard, M. (2016). Do stress, health behavior, and sleep mediate the association between loneliness and adverse health conditions among older people? Social Science & Medicine, 152, 80– 86. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.020 26849687 · DOI
  9. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155– 159. 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 19565683 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Cohen, S., Doyle, W.J., Skoner, D.P., Rabin, B.S., & Gwaltney, Jr, J.M. (1997). Social ties and susceptibility to the common cold. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 277, 1940– 1944. 10.1001/jama.1997.03540480040036 9200634 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Cohen, S., & Syme, S.L. (1985). Social support and health. 390. Academic Press.
  12. Crittenden, C.N., Pressman, S.D., Cohen, S., Janicki‐Deverts, D., Smith, B.W., & Seeman, T.E. (2014). Social integration and pulmonary function in the elderly. Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 33, 535– 543. 10.1037/hea0000029 PMC4069253 24884907 · DOI
  13. Draper, A., Koch, R.M., van der Meer, J.W., Aj Apps, M., Pickkers, P., Husain, M., & van der Schaaf, M.E. (2018). Effort but not reward sensitivity is altered by acute sickness induced by experimental endotoxemia in humans. Neuropsychopharmacology: Official Publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 43(5), 1107– 1118. 10.1038/npp.2017.231 28948979 PMC5854801 · DOI
  14. Eisenberger, N.I., & Cole, S.W. (2012). Social neuroscience and health: neurophysiological mechanisms linking social ties with physical health. Nature Neuroscience, 15, 669– 674. 10.1038/nn.3086 22504347 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Eisenberger, N.I., Taylor, S.E., Gable, S.L., Hilmert, C.J., & Lieberman, M.D. (2007). Neural pathways link social support to attenuated neuroendocrine stress responses. NeuroImage, 35, 1601– 1612. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.038 17395493 PMC2710966 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Finch, J.F., Okun, M.A., Pool, G.J., & Ruehlman, L.S. (1999). A comparison of the influence of conflictual and supportive social interactions on psychological distress. Journal of Personality, 67, 581– 621. 10.1111/1467-6494.00066 10444852 · DOI
  17. Heinrichs, M., Baumgartner, T., Kirschbaum, C., & Ehlert, U. (2003). Social support and oxytocin interact to suppress cortisol and subjective responses to psychosocial stress. Biological Psychiatry, 54, 1389– 1398. 10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00465-7 14675803 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Helgeson, V.S., & Cohen, S. (1996). Social support and adjustment to cancer: Reconciling descriptive, correlational, and intervention research. Health Psychology, 15(2), 135– 148. 10.1037/0278-6133.15.2.135 8681922 · DOI
  19. Hockey, B., & Hockey, R. (2013). The psychology of fatigue: work, effort and control. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Juster, R.‐P., McEwen, B.S., & Lupien, S.J. (2010). Allostatic load biomarkers of chronic stress and impact on health and cognition. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(1), 2– 16. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.10.002 19822172 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Keinan, G., & Malach‐Pines, A. (2007). Stress and burnout among prison personnel: sources, outcomes, and intervention strategies. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 380– 398. 10.1177/0093854806290007 · DOI
  22. Morese, R., Lamm, C., Bosco, F.M., Valentini, M.C., & Silani, G. (2019). Social support modulates the neural correlates underlying social exclusion. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 14, 633– 643. 10.1093/scan/nsz033 31056647 PMC6688450 · DOI
  23. Müller, T., & Apps, M.A.J. (2019). Motivational fatigue: A neurocognitive framework for the impact of effortful exertion on subsequent motivation. Neuropsychologia, 123, 141– 151. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.030 29738794 · DOI
  24. Nater, U.M., Maloney, E., Heim, C., & Reeves, W.C. (2011). Cumulative life stress in chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychiatry Research, 189(2), 318– 320. 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.07.015 21840607 · DOI
  25. Platt, J., Keyes, K.M., & Koenen, K.C. (2014). Size of the social network versus quality of social support: which is more protective against PTSD? Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 49, 1279– 1286. 10.1007/s00127-013-0798-4 24310782 PMC7864543 · DOI
  26. Rajkumar, R.P. (2020). COVID‐19 and mental health: A review of the existing literature. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 52, 102066. 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102066 32302935 PMC7151415 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Santini, Z.I., Koyanagi, A., Tyrovolas, S., Mason, C., & Haro, J.M. (2015). The association between social relationships and depression: a systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 175, 53– 65. 10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.049 25594512 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Shevlin, M., Nolan, E., Owczarek, M., McBride, O., Murphy, J., Gibson Miller, J., … Bentall, R.P. (2020). COVID‐19‐related anxiety predicts somatic symptoms in the UK population. British Journal of Health Psychology, 26. 10.1111/bjhp.12430 PMC7283836 32458550 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Singer, T., & Lamm, C. (2009). The social neuroscience of empathy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 81– 96. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04418.x 19338504 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Smith, K.P., & Christakis, N.A. (2008). Social networks and health. Annual Review of Sociology, 34(1), 405– 429. 10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134601 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Sneed, R.S., Cohen, S., Turner, R.B., & Doyle, W.J. (2012). Parenthood and host resistance to the common cold. Psychosomatic Medicine, 74, 567– 573. 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31825941ff 22773866 PMC3746028 · DOI
  32. Snyder‐Mackler, N., Burger, J.R., Gaydosh, L., Belsky, D.W., Noppert, G.A., Campos, F.A., … Tung, J. (2020). Social determinants of health and survival in humans and other animals. Science, 368, eaax9553. 10.1126/science.aax9553 32439765 PMC7398600 · DOI · Paper page
  33. St‐Jean‐Trudel, E., & Guay, S. (2009). The relationship between social support, psychological stress and the risk of developing anxiety disorders in men and women: results of a national study. Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique, 100, 148– 152. 10.1007/bf03405526 19839294 PMC6974214 · DOI
  34. Strahler, J., Skoluda, N., Rohleder, N., & Nater, U.M. (2016). Dysregulated stress signal sensitivity and inflammatory disinhibition as a pathophysiological mechanism of stress‐related chronic fatigue. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 68, 298– 318. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.05.008 27208412 · DOI
  35. Ussher, J., Kirsten, L., Butow, P., & Sandoval, M. (2006). What do cancer support groups provide which other supportive relationships do not? The experience of peer support groups for people with cancer. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 2565– 2576. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.10.034 16303220 · DOI
  36. Vinkers, C.H., van Amelsvoort, T., Bisson, J.I., Branchi, I., Cryan, J.F., Domschke, K., … van der Wee, N.J.A. (2020). Stress resilience during the coronavirus pandemic. European Neuropsychopharmacology: the Journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 35, 12– 16. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2020.05.003 32446705 PMC7211573 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Vlahovic, T.A., Roberts, S., & Dunbar, R. (2012). Effects of duration and laughter on subjective happiness within different modes of communication. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication: JCMC, 17, 436– 450. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01584.x · DOI
  38. Wills, T. A., & Shinar, O. (2000). Measuring perceived and received social support. In S. Cohen (Ed.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (Vol. 345, pp. 86– 135). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, xi. 10.1093/med:psych/9780195126709.003.0004 · DOI
  39. Wyller, V.B., Eriksen, H.R., & Malterud, K. (2009). Can sustained arousal explain the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome? Behavioral and Brain Functions: BBF, 5, 10. 10.1186/1744-9081-5-10 19236717 PMC2654901 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nitschke, J. P., Forbes, P. A. G., Ali, N., Cutler, J., Apps, M. A. J., Lockwood, P. L., & Lamm, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Nitschke, Jonas P.
  • Lamm, Claus
Venue
British Journal of Health Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-10-25
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
553-569
ISSN
  • 1359-107X (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8287
OpenAlex
W3094151465
Cited by
329
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 8
FWCI
24.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship@McGill (McGill) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Universität Wien
  • Austrian Science Fund (I3381)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
social connectedness, COVID-19 lockdown, perceived stress, worry, fatigue, resilience, social distancing, social networks, psychological distress, mediation
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Communicable Disease Control, Fatigue, Humans, Uncertainty, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review