Cited by 58Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMental Health and Psychiatry

Neurophysiologic markers of abnormal brain activity in schizophrenia

Open access
Rissling, Anthony J., Makeig, Scott, Braff, David L., Light, Gregory A.·2010·Current Psychiatry Reports

Abstract

Cortical electrophysiologic event-related potentials are multidimensional measures of information processing that are well-suited for efficiently parsing automatic and controlled components of cognition that span the range of deficits evidenced in schizophrenia patients. These information processes are key cognitive measures that are recognized as informative and valid targets for understanding the neurobiology of schizophrenia. These measures may be used in concert with the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) neurocognitive measures in the development of novel treatments for schizophrenia and related neuropsychiatric disorders. The employment of novel event-related potential paradigms designed to carefully characterize the early spectrum of perceptual and cognitive information processing allows investigators to identify the neurophysiologic basis of cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia and to examine the associated clinical and functional impairments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11920-010-0149-z

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rissling, A. J., Makeig, S., Braff, D. L., & Light, G. A.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Light, Gregory A.
Venue
Current Psychiatry Reports
Published
2010-09-21
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
572-578
ISSN
  • 1523-3812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-1645
OpenAlex
W2125271724
Cited by
58
References
47
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Current Psychiatry Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Allergan
  • National Institute of Mental Health (#MH065571, MH079777, R01MH065554, R01MH065571, R01MH079777)
  • NIH Clinical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
schizophrenia, event-related potentials, cognitive impairment, cortical processing, automatic and controlled processing, perceptual processing, neuropsychiatric disorders
MeSH terms
Brain, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Schizophrenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review