Cited by 216Psychiatric care and mental health servicesPrimary Care and Health OutcomesMental Health Treatment and Access

Mental health collaborative care and its role in primary care settings

Open access
Goodrich, David E., Kilbourne, Amy M., Nord, Kristina M., Bauer, Mark S.·2013·Current Psychiatry Reports

Abstract

Collaborative care models (CCMs) provide a pragmatic strategy to deliver integrated mental health and medical care for persons with mental health conditions served in primary care settings. CCMs are team-based intervention to enact system-level redesign by improving patient care through organizational leadership support, provider decision support, and clinical information systems, as well as engaging patients in their care through self-management support and linkages to community resources. The model is also a cost-efficient strategy for primary care practices to improve outcomes for a range of mental health conditions across populations and settings. CCMs can help achieve integrated care aims underhealth care reform yet organizational and financial issues may affect adoption into routine primary care. Notably, successful implementation of CCMs in routine care will require alignment of financial incentives to support systems redesign investments, reimbursements for mental health providers, and adaptation across different practice settings and infrastructure to offer all CCM components.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11920-013-0383-2

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [100]Scott D Happell B Utilization and Perceptions of Primary Health Care Services in Australian Adults with Mental Illness. Popul Health Manag 2012 23276291

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goodrich, D. E., Kilbourne, A. M., Nord, K. M., & Bauer, M. S.
Affiliations
  • VA Center for Clinical Management Research (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Kilbourne, Amy M.
Venue
Current Psychiatry Reports
Published
2013-07-24
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
383-383
ISSN
  • 1523-3812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-1645
OpenAlex
W2086783199
Cited by
216
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Psychiatry Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH079994, R34MH74509, R01 MH 79994, R34MH074509)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
collaborative care, integrated mental health care, primary care, team-based care, mental illness, self-management support, community resource linkage, cost-effectiveness, health care reform, financial incentives, implementation barriers
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Mental Health Services, Primary Health Care, Models, Organizational, Patient-Centered Care, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review